blob: 95b25bf36cb4721531b7a5fa7253557cb0f4e53b (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
|
Would it make sense to automatically delete a page if it's edited and
cleared to be entirely empty (or only have whitespace)? Discuss. --[[Joey]]
I'd say so; yes. A method of deleting pages via the web would be great; I
can't think of a use of keeping blank pages around. What about vandalism --
if someone blanks a page and deletes it and someone else wishes to restore
it; or is undoing edits via the web a bigger issue? -- [[users/Jon]]
Of course there's already a way to delete pages (remove plugin). So the
question is really:
* Does it make sense to have a second way to do it, by clearing the page?
* Should it be enabled even if the full remove plugin isn't?
Re vandalism in general, I am generally happy using git-revert to kill the
offending change. --[[Joey]]
I don't think we need a second way to delete pages, which would probably be
used by the only few people who will learn it's possible by random
documentation reading, find it useful, *and* remember it. -- [[intrigeri]]
On the other hand, clearing the page's whole content essentially means deleting
the page. That's what the user intended to do in this case. The information
content of an empty vs. a deleted page is essentially the same, I'd say. But
having ikiwiki remove those stale pages would save some (minimal, admittedly)
time needed for manual clean-up. --[[tschwinge]]
On EmacsWiki, a page is marked for deletion when it contains just the DeletedPage
keyword and if there were no page editions since XX days. Here, I use pages that
can be empty everyday and filled all day long. It does not make sense to me to
delete these pages :). --[[xma]]
I was not aware of [[plugins/remove]]. I don't think another method is necessary -- [[users/Jon]]
> Consensus seems to be [[won't fix|done]] as far as I can see. --[[smcv]]
|