1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
|
### Sorting
Is there a way to have the generated maps sorted by *title* instead of *filename* when show=title is used?
Thanks
-- Thiana
> [[bugs/map_sorts_by_pagename_and_not_title_when_show__61__title_is_used]] --[[Joey]]
----
Question: Is there a way to generate a listing that shows *both* title and description meta information? Currently, a \[\[!map ...]] shows only one of the two, but I'd like to generate a navigation that looks like a description list. For example:
* This is the title meta information.
This is the description meta information
* This is another title.
And so on ...
Is that possible?
--Peter
----
The site I'm trying to set up right now (not really a wiki - no public editing) is divided into topics. Topics are pages that have `\[[!meta link="/topic"]]`. Topic pages contain an index of their subpages (done with `\[[!inline]]`); the subpages are the real content. I want a map in the sidebar that lists:
* all of the topics;
* all of the first-level subpages of the *current topic only*.
That is, if the current page is "Topic A" or "Topic A/Page 1", then the map should look like
Topic A
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Topic B
Topic C
but if the current page is "Topic B" or one of its subpages, then the map should look like
Topic A
Topic B
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Topic C
On the top-level index page, or on any other page that is neither a topic nor a subpage of a topic, the map should list only the topics.
Is there any way to do that? I don't mind mucking around with `\[[!meta]]` on every page if that's what it takes.
-- Zack
> I think that you're looking for this:
>
> `pages="((Topic*/* or Topic*) and ./*) or (Topic* and ! Topic*/*)"`
>
> Let's pull that [[PageSpec]] apart.
>
> * `(Topic*/* or Topic*)` matches all pages that are underneath a Topic
> page or are a topic page themselves.
> * `and ./*` further adds the limitation that the pages have to be
> in the same directory as the page that is displaying the map. So,
> for `Topic_A/Page_1`, it will match `Topic_A/*`; for `Topic_A`,
> it will match `Topic_*` but not subpages.
> * Finally, `Topic* and ! Topic*/*` matches all the toplevel topic pages,
> since we always want those to show up.
>
> I haven't tested that this works or displays, but I hope it gets you
> on the right track. PS, be aware of
> [[this_sidebar_issue|todo/Post-compilation_inclusion_of_the_sidebar]]!
> --[[Joey]]
>> Thanks, but this assumes that topic pages are named `Topic<something>`.
>> They aren't. They are tagged with `\[[!meta link="/topic"]]`, and as
>> far as I can tell there is no [[PageSpec]] notation for "subpages of a
>> page that satisfies link(foo)"...
>> -- Zack
>>> I think that the ideas and code in
>>> [[todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies]] might also handle this case.
>>> --[[Joey]]
----
I feel like this should be obvious, but I can't figure out how to sort numerically.
I have `map pages="./* and !*/Discussion and !*/sidebar"` and a bunch of pages with names like 1, 2, 3, 11, 12, 1/1.1, 12/12.3 etc. I want to sort them numerically. I see lots of conversation implying there's a simple way to do it, but not how.
> No, you can't: map can't currently use a non-default sort order. If it
> could, then you could use [[plugins/sortnaturally]]. There's a
> [[feature_request|todo/sort_parameter_for_map_plugin_and_directive]];
> [[a_bug_references_it|bugs/map_sorts_by_pagename_and_not_title_when_show=title_is_used]].
> --[[smcv]]
|