aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/themes
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/themes')
-rw-r--r--doc/themes/discussion.mdwn6
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/themes/discussion.mdwn b/doc/themes/discussion.mdwn
index d8241a8e6..1c0dd91ec 100644
--- a/doc/themes/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/doc/themes/discussion.mdwn
@@ -35,6 +35,12 @@ links to the actual theme. -- [[anarcat]]
>>> version of `page.tmpl` containing only the features you personally
>>> need, but the `page.tmpl` in ikiwiki should be comprehensive. --[[smcv]]
+>>>> I've tried to make the least changes possible in [this page.tmpl file](https://notabug.org/iikb/ikiwiki-theme-bootstrap/raw/master/templates/page.tmpl), but I couldn't overcome the suckness of bootstrap itself.
+>>>> I am aware of alternatives to bootstrap, but it seems that every one of them would require some changes in the `page.tmpl` to work as expected.
+>>>> I think it is realistic to have a bootstrap (or other superb, fantastic css frame*lazy*work) without a `page.tmpl`,
+>>>> but I also think there should be other way around the chaos of each and every [[available theme|theme_market]] having it's own installing proccess.
+>>>> Other argument I have is: could we have a theme-contrib, like the [[plugins]] have? This would require the mantainer to implement the new features in their themes.
+
---
I have a question.