diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/bugs')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/invalid_meta_date_or_updated_not_diagnosed.mdwn | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/invalid_meta_date_or_updated_not_diagnosed.mdwn b/doc/bugs/invalid_meta_date_or_updated_not_diagnosed.mdwn index c7f8ebd3e..cd39438a7 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/invalid_meta_date_or_updated_not_diagnosed.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/invalid_meta_date_or_updated_not_diagnosed.mdwn @@ -70,3 +70,20 @@ Thanks! > without parsing the date, they can still use `\[[!meta name="date" content="xxx"]]`. > > [[!tag done]] --[[smcv]] + +> > To my defense, when I wrote this, I didn't consider this a bug: I +> > was assuming the problem I was seeing was just some dumb mistake +> > that I made and, indeed, there *was* one such formatting mistake. +> > +> > But yeah, I could have re-edited this whole thing to make it look +> > better. I'm sorry, but I was at the end of an already long +> > yak-shaving session... +> > +> > I wasn't sure if doing an error was the right way to go, as this +> > might break rendering for existing sites... But I'm glad you fixed +> > this anyways! +> > +> > Thank you for the super-fast-response! :) I also tried updating +> > the [[meta directive documentation|ikiwiki/directive/meta]] so +> > that it's a little more detailed about that stuff. I hope that's +> > alright... -- [[anarcat]] |