diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/enumerations_of_dates_not_formatted_correctly.mdwn | 12 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/enumerations_of_dates_not_formatted_correctly.mdwn b/doc/bugs/enumerations_of_dates_not_formatted_correctly.mdwn index f9ebf8c13..fe9c5d480 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/enumerations_of_dates_not_formatted_correctly.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/enumerations_of_dates_not_formatted_correctly.mdwn @@ -29,3 +29,15 @@ Testcase: > * 27\. March > > or by writing "1st January" and so on. --[[smcv]] + +>> I think that this is a bug in Text::Markdown (and probably other +>> versions of markdown). The [markdown spec)(http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax.text), +>> though unmaintained and bitrotted into near illegibility, seems to say +>> that list items can only be preceeded by whitespace: +>> +>>> "List markers typically start at the left margin, but may be indented by +>>> up to three spaces." +>> +>> So "* * * 1. 2. 3." should not be parsed as a deeply nested list. +>> +>> Forwarded to upsteam RT. [[done]] --[[Joey]] |