diff options
author | Joey Hess <joey@kodama.kitenet.net> | 2008-10-26 19:43:57 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joey Hess <joey@kodama.kitenet.net> | 2008-10-26 19:43:57 -0400 |
commit | 65bf71d387ba406d4fcf697d76151b6953176cf8 (patch) | |
tree | 22e6954f3472aefb220dec883fecb12663a70278 /doc | |
parent | e8652cb0a55e6c458b700a25281eac3f2197a8d2 (diff) | |
download | ikiwiki-65bf71d387ba406d4fcf697d76151b6953176cf8.tar ikiwiki-65bf71d387ba406d4fcf697d76151b6953176cf8.tar.gz |
organizing and pulling together syntax highlighting info
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/plugins/contrib/sourcehighlight.mdwn | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn | 54 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/wiki-formatted_comments_with_syntax_plugin.mdwn | 5 |
3 files changed, 63 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/sourcehighlight.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/sourcehighlight.mdwn index 2eb22e6ed..fb368945b 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/contrib/sourcehighlight.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/sourcehighlight.mdwn @@ -20,3 +20,8 @@ This problem with sourcehighlight needs to be fixed before it is very useful. - Is there a way to configure the colors used by source-highlight (other than editing the globally installed "default.style" file)? It would help if I could pass the command arbitrary command-line arguments; then I could configure which config file it's supposed to use. For instance, I'm not a fan of hard-coding the colors into the HTML output. IMHO, css-style formatting should be preferred. All that can be set via the command line ... --Peter > I don't really have time right now, but it should be easy to add, if you look at how src-lang is handled. Patches are welcome :-) --[[DavidBremner]] + +Note that [[Will]] wrote a plugin that uses source-highlight also. It's +available +[here|todo/automatic_use_of_syntax_plugin_on_source_code_files/discussion]]. +--[[Joey]] diff --git a/doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn b/doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e992cc514 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +There's been a lot of work on contrib syntax highlighting plugins. One should be +picked and added to ikiwiki core. + +Ideally, it should support both converting whole source files into wiki +pages, as well as doing syntax highlighting as a preprocessor directive +(which is either passed the text, or reads it from a file). + +The big list of possibilities: + +* [[plugins/contrib/highlightcode]] uses [[cpan Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate]], + operates on whole source files only, has a few bugs (see + [here](http://u32.net/Highlight_Code_Plugin/), and needs to be updated to + support [[bugs/multiple_pages_with_same_name]]. +* [[cpan IkiWiki-Plugin-syntax]] only operates as a directive. + Interestingly, it supports multiple highlighting backends, including Kate + and Vim. +* [[plugins/contrib/syntax]] only operates as a directive + ([[not_on_source_code_files|automatic_use_of_syntax_plugin_on_source_code_files]]), + and uses [[cpan Text::VimColor]]. +* [[plugins/contrib/sourcehighlight]] uses src-highlight, and operates on + whole source files only. Needs to be updated to + support [[bugs/multiple_pages_with_same_name]]. +* [[sourcecode|todo/automatic_use_of_syntax_plugin_on_source_code_files/discussion]] + also uses src-highlight, and operates on whole source files. + Has problems with [[bugs/multiple_pages_with_same_name]]. + +General problems: + +* Using non-perl syntax highlighting backends is slow. I'd prefer either + using a perl module, or a multiple-backend solution that can use a perl + module as one option. +* Currently no single plugin supports both modes of operation (directive + and whole source file to page). +* Nothing seems to support + [[wiki-formatted_comments|wiki-formatted_comments_with_syntax_plugin]] + inside source files. Doing this probably means post-processing the + results of the highlighting engine, to find places where it's highlighted + comments, and then running them through the ikiwiki rendering pipeline. + This seems fairly doable with [[cpan Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate]], + at least. +* The whole-file plugins tend to have a problem that things that look like + wikilinks in the source code get munged into links by ikiwiki, which can + have confusing results. Similar problem with preprocessor directives. +* The whole-file plugins all get confused if there is a `foo.c` and a `foo.h`. + This is trivially fixable now by passing the keepextension option when + registering the htmlize hooks, though. +* Whole-file plugins register a bunch of htmlize hooks. The wacky thing + about it is that, when creating a new page, you can then pick "c" or + "h" or "pl" etc from the dropdown that normally has "mdwn" etc in it. + Is this a bug, or a feature? (Even if a feature, plugins with many + extensions make the dropdown unusable..) +* The per page highlighters can't handle "Makefile", or other files + without a significant extension. +* diff --git a/doc/todo/wiki-formatted_comments_with_syntax_plugin.mdwn b/doc/todo/wiki-formatted_comments_with_syntax_plugin.mdwn index 08ca61b0c..a5244c9ef 100644 --- a/doc/todo/wiki-formatted_comments_with_syntax_plugin.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/wiki-formatted_comments_with_syntax_plugin.mdwn @@ -1 +1,4 @@ -[[Wishlist]] item: I'd love to see the ability to optionally switch back to wiki syntax within the comments of code pretty-printed with the [[plugins/contrib/syntax]] plugin. This would allow the use of links and formatting in comments. +[[Wishlist]] item: I'd love to see the ability to optionally switch back to +wiki syntax within the comments of code pretty-printed with the +[[plugins/contrib/syntax]] plugin. This would allow the use of links and +formatting in comments. |