rename todo/Re-use_translated_content_instead_of_skipping_if_previously_translated.mdwn to bugs/Re-use_translated_content_instead_of_skipping_if_previously_translated.mdwn

2 files changed, 0 insertions, 264 deletions

diff --git a/doc/todo/Re-use_translated_content_instead_of_skipping_if_previously_translated.mdwn b/doc/todo/Re-use_translated_content_instead_of_skipping_if_previously_translated.mdwn
deleted file mode 100644
index 89074f79a..000000000
--- a/doc/todo/Re-use_translated_content_instead_of_skipping_if_previously_translated.mdwn
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,179 +0,0 @@
-There is an issue where an initial "inline" directive would be
-translated correctly but subsequent inlines of the same page would
-result in the raw contents of the ".po" file (ie. starting with the raw
-copyright headers!) being inserted into the page instead.
-
-For example, given a "index.mdwn" containing:
-
-    \[[!inline pages="inline" raw="yes"]]
-    \[[!inline pages="inline" raw="yes"]]
-
-… and an "index.de.po" of:
-
-    msgid "\[[!inline pages=\"inline\" raw=\"yes\"]]\n"
-    msgstr "\[[!inline pages=\"inline.de\" raw=\"yes\"]]\n"
-
-… together with an "inline.mdwn" of:
-
-   This is inlined content.
-
-… and an "inline.de.po" of:
-
-    msgid "This is inlined content."
-    msgstr "This is German inlined content."
-
-§
-
-This would result in the following translation:
-
-    This is the inlined content.
-    # SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE
-    # Copyright (C) YEAR Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-    # This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package.
-    # FIRST AUTHOR <EMAIL@ADDRESS>, YEAR.
-
-… instead of (of course)
-
-    This is the inlined content.
-    This is the inlined content.
-
-[[Initially proposed patch from Chris Lamb|20180628-patch.txt]]
-
-[[!tag patch]]
-
-> Thank you Chris! I've reviewed the patch (with my "original author of the po plugin" hat on) and it looks good to me. I'm not 100% sure about `alreadyfiltered` being the best name for something that's not a predicated anymore but it's good enough. Then I wore my end-user hat and confirmed that with Chris' patch applied, the reproducer we had for this bug at Tails works fine. So IMO we're good to go and I recommend to apply this patch. Thanks in advance! -- [[intrigeri]]
-
-> Any update on getting this merged? — [[lamby]], Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:36:37 +0200
-
-> Indeed, would love to see this merged! What might be the next steps here? — [[lamby]],  Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:57:37 -0400
-
-> I've filed this in Debian GNU/Linux at <https://bugs.debian.org/911356> — [[lamby]], Thu, 18 Oct 2018 20:18:58 -0400
-
->> As I said on the Debian bug, I think we badly need test coverage for
->> this sort of thing, otherwise it *will* regress. The po plugin is
->> relatively complicated and hooks into lots of places in ikiwiki,
->> and I don't think any of the active ikiwiki maintainers use it
->> themselves, which means it can easily break (or have pre-existing
->> bugs) without anyone realising.
->>
->> For now I've added a failing test-case for this particular bug.
->> --[[smcv]]
-
----
-
-Review from [[smcv]]:
-
-The patch attached to the Debian bug and the patch pasted here (which
-I've moved to an attachment) appear to be different, but I'm not going to
-do a line-by-line review of the patches and their differences for now
-because I'm not sure their approach is fully correct.
-
-As we know, the two hardest things in computer science are naming, cache
-invalidation and off-by-one errors. Unfortunately this patch has issues
-with naming and cache invalidation. It's effectively turning the
-`alreadyfiltered` mechanism into a cache of memoized results of calling
-`po_to_markup()` on pages' content, keyed by the page name and the
-`destpage`, which is either the page name again or the name of a page
-into which the `page` is to be inlined (even though the result of
-`po_to_markup()` doesn't actually vary with the `destpage`).
-
-This naturally raises the usual concerns about having a cache:
-
-* How large does it grow?
-* Do we invalidate it every time we need to?
-* Do we even need it?
-
-The cache size is mainly a concern for large wikis being rebuilt. If you
-have a wiki with 1000 translated pages in 3 languages each, each of which
-is inlined into an average of one other page, then by the time you finish
-a rebuild you'll be holding 6000 translated pages in memory. If we change
-the `alreadyfiltered` mechanism to be keyed by the page name and not the
-(page, destpage) pair, that drops to 3000, but that's still
-O(pages \* languages) which seems like a lot. As a general design
-principle, ikiwiki tries not to hold full content in RAM for more than
-the currently-processed page.
-
-We invalidate the `alreadyfiltered` for a (page, page) pair in an
-editcontent hook, and we never invalidate (page, destpage) pairs for
-page != destpage at all. Are we sure there is no other circumstance in
-which the content of a page can change?
-
-One of the things I tried doing for a simple solution was to remove the
-cache altogether, because I wasn't sure why we had this `alreadyfiltered`
-mechanism in the first place. This passes tests, which suggests that
-either the `alreadyfiltered` mechanism is unnecessary, or our regression
-test coverage for `po` is insufficient.
-
-Looking back at the history of the `po` plugin, it seems that the
-`alreadyfiltered` mechanism was introduced (under a different name,
-with less abstraction) by [[intrigeri]] in commit 1e874b3f:
-
-    po plugin[filter]: avoid converting more than once per destfile
-
-    Only the first filter function call on a given {page,destpage} must convert it
-    from the PO file, subsequent calls must leave the passed $content unmodified.
-
-    Else, preprocessing loops are the rule.
-
-I don't understand this. Under what circumstances would we pass content
-through the filter hooks, and then pass it back through the same filter
-hooks? Can we not do that, instead? If at all possible we should at
-least have test coverage for the situation where this happened (but I
-can't add this without knowing what it was).
-
-I feel as though it should be an invariant that the output of a filter
-hook is never passed back through filter hooks: otherwise every filter
-hook would have to be able to be able to detect and skip processing
-its own output, which is not necessarily even possible. For instance,
-suppose you had a plugin with a filter that turned tab-separated text
-files into `<table>` markup: every HTML file that doesn't contain tabs
-is trivially a TSV file with one column, so you can't know whether a
-blob of text is TSV or HTML.
-
-I wondered whether the loops referenced in 1e874b3f might have been
-fixed in 192ce7a2:
-
-    remove unnecessary and troublesome filter calls
-
-    This better defines what the filter hook is passed, to only be the raw,
-    complete text of a page. Not some snippet, or data read in from an
-    unrelated template.
-
-    Several plugins that filtered text that originates from an (already
-    filtered) page were modified not to do that. Note that this was not
-    done very consistently before; other plugins that receive text from a
-    page called preprocess on it w/o first calling filter.
-
-    The template plugin gets text from elsewhere, and was also changed not to
-    filter it. That leads to one known regression -- the embed plugin cannot
-    be used to embed stuff in templates now. But that plugin is deprecated
-    anyway.
-
-    Later we may want to increase the coverage of what is filtered. Perhaps
-    a good goal would be to allow writing a filter plugin that filters
-    out unwanted words, from any input. We're not there yet; not only
-    does the template plugin load unfiltered text from its templates now,
-    but so can the table plugin, and other plugins that use templates (like
-    inline!). I think we can cross that bridge when we come to it. If I wanted
-    such a censoring plugin, I'd probably make it use a sanitize hook instead,
-    for the better coverage.
-
-    For now I am concentrating on the needs of the two non-deprecated users
-    of filter. This should fix bugs/po_vs_templates, and it probably fixes
-    an obscure bug around txt's use of filter for robots.txt.
-
-but I'm not sure that any of the redundant filtering removed in that
-commit was actually relevant to `po` users?
-
-[[intrigeri]], can you shed any light on this?
-
-Naming is the easy part of this review: the `alreadyfiltered` family of
-functions are not named like cache getter/setter functions. This could
-be resolved by renaming.
-
----
-
-[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/wip/po-filter-every-time browse="https://git.pseudorandom.co.uk/smcv/ikiwiki.git/log/refs/heads/wip/po-filter-every-time" author="[[Simon_McVittie|smcv]]"]]
-
-If it's valid to remove the `alreadyfiltered` mechanism, my
-`wip/po-filter-every-time` branch does that. Please test?
diff --git a/doc/todo/Re-use_translated_content_instead_of_skipping_if_previously_translated/20180628-patch.txt b/doc/todo/Re-use_translated_content_instead_of_skipping_if_previously_translated/20180628-patch.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 217352f19..000000000
--- a/doc/todo/Re-use_translated_content_instead_of_skipping_if_previously_translated/20180628-patch.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,85 +0,0 @@
-From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 19:30:15 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] Re-use translated content instead of skipping if previously
- translated.
-
-This fixes an issue where an initial `inline` directive would be translated
-correctly, but subsequent inlines of the same would result in the raw
-contents of the `.po` file being inserted into the page instead.
-
-For example, given a `index.mdwn` containing:
-
-    \[[!inline pages="inline" raw="yes"]]
-    \[[!inline pages="inline" raw="yes"]]
-
-.. and an `index.de.po` of:
-
-    msgid "\[[!inline pages=\"inline\" raw=\"yes\"]]\n"
-    msgstr "\[[!inline pages=\"inline.de\" raw=\"yes\"]]\n"
-
-.. together with an `inline.mdwn` of:
-
-   This is inlined content.
-
-.. and an `inline.de.po` of:
-
-    msgid "This is inlined content."
-    msgstr "This is German inlined content."
-
-.. would result in the following translation:
-
-    This is the inlined content.
-    # SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE
-    # Copyright (C) YEAR Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-    # This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package.
-    # FIRST AUTHOR <EMAIL@ADDRESS>, YEAR.
-
-.. instead of, of course:
-
-    This is the inlined content.
-    This is the inlined content.
----
- IkiWiki/Plugin/po.pm | 15 +++++++++------
- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/IkiWiki/Plugin/po.pm b/IkiWiki/Plugin/po.pm
-index 418e8e58a..ecd1f5499 100644
---- a/IkiWiki/Plugin/po.pm
-+++ b/IkiWiki/Plugin/po.pm
-@@ -303,9 +303,12 @@ sub filter (@) {
- 	my $page = $params{page};
- 	my $destpage = $params{destpage};
- 	my $content = $params{content};
--	if (istranslation($page) && ! alreadyfiltered($page, $destpage)) {
--		$content = po_to_markup($page, $content);
--		setalreadyfiltered($page, $destpage);
-+	if (istranslation($page)) {
-+		if (!defined(alreadyfiltered($page, $destpage))) {
-+			$content = po_to_markup($page, $content);
-+			setalreadyfiltered($page, $destpage, $content);
-+		}
-+		$content = alreadyfiltered($page, $destpage);
- 	}
- 	return $content;
- }
-@@ -747,15 +750,15 @@ sub myisselflink ($$) {
- 		my $page=shift;
- 		my $destpage=shift;
- 
--		return exists $filtered{$page}{$destpage}
--			 && $filtered{$page}{$destpage} eq 1;
-+		return $filtered{$page}{$destpage};
- 	}
- 
- 	sub setalreadyfiltered($$) {
- 		my $page=shift;
- 		my $destpage=shift;
-+		my $content=shift;
- 
--		$filtered{$page}{$destpage}=1;
-+		$filtered{$page}{$destpage}=$content;
- 	}
- 
- 	sub unsetalreadyfiltered($$) {
--- 
-2.18.0