diff options
| author | Joey Hess <joey@gnu.kitenet.net> | 2010-01-04 20:22:32 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joey Hess <joey@gnu.kitenet.net> | 2010-01-04 20:22:32 -0500 |
| commit | f5bdfc29ee32446fcad4ad2ccc82e109445f4755 (patch) | |
| tree | 8bd76e5bcd24d76d6c0aa392dde1bddc5da8529c /doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn | |
| parent | f96a7b775617596f16252f9b8be7cf1761c24da0 (diff) | |
| download | ikiwiki-f5bdfc29ee32446fcad4ad2ccc82e109445f4755.tar ikiwiki-f5bdfc29ee32446fcad4ad2ccc82e109445f4755.tar.gz | |
response
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn b/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn index 57ab95985..66a68032f 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn @@ -38,3 +38,10 @@ and a whitelist of OpenIDs in `locked_pages`...) >>>> Would I be able to do what I want with a local plugin that >>>> knows my auth requirements and abuses canedit -- e.g., if the page >>>> matches */Discussion, redirect to Signin form, else httpauth? --[[schmonz]] + +>>>>> If you wanted users to need to login with openid or passwordauth +>>>>> for discussion pages, you could do that. That seems it would be +>>>>> annoying for httpauth users (who were not current authed) though, +>>>>> as they would then see the openid signin form. +>>>>> +>>>>> --[[Joey]] |