aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/bugs/No_link_for_blog_items_when_filename_contains_a_colon.mdwn
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoey Hess <joey@kodama.kitenet.net>2008-07-25 12:51:50 -0400
committerJoey Hess <joey@kodama.kitenet.net>2008-07-25 12:51:50 -0400
commit435a8e1ce5cfde3f26175b3ce69927eb714725a5 (patch)
tree5331f79d4043b18cd8fac241e0fbdb95a763b9d8 /doc/bugs/No_link_for_blog_items_when_filename_contains_a_colon.mdwn
parent75acf768516fd15d893ea3eb6551003693f2dc1a (diff)
downloadikiwiki-435a8e1ce5cfde3f26175b3ce69927eb714725a5.tar
ikiwiki-435a8e1ce5cfde3f26175b3ce69927eb714725a5.tar.gz
response
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/bugs/No_link_for_blog_items_when_filename_contains_a_colon.mdwn')
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/No_link_for_blog_items_when_filename_contains_a_colon.mdwn5
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/No_link_for_blog_items_when_filename_contains_a_colon.mdwn b/doc/bugs/No_link_for_blog_items_when_filename_contains_a_colon.mdwn
index b78515596..019970899 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/No_link_for_blog_items_when_filename_contains_a_colon.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/No_link_for_blog_items_when_filename_contains_a_colon.mdwn
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ What do you think about that? Does the patch have any side-effects I didn't see?
>> at least I hope so ;-) ): I just created a test post in the sandbox here: [[sandbox/test: with a colon in its name]]
>> (btw, why doesn't this get a hyperlink here?).
>>
+>>> Because wikilinks cannot have spaces, convert to underscores.
+>>> --[[Joey]]
+>>
>> As it is put in the list of blog posts as a relative link, it starts
>> with `<word><colon>` -- this makes the browser think that "test" is a protocol specification which is to replace `http`,
>> so it complains (at least Opera and Firefox/Iceweasel on my Debian Etch do). What I described above for subpages
@@ -69,3 +72,5 @@ What do you think about that? Does the patch have any side-effects I didn't see?
>>
>> I think the cleanest solution would be to quote colons in page names (like it is currently done for slashes)?
>> Starting the links with "`./`", as I proposed above, now seems a bit ugly to me... --Mathias
+
+>>> No, it's all [[done]] in 2.55. --[[Joey]]