aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorintrigeri <intrigeri@boum.org>2009-01-20 00:53:46 +0100
committerintrigeri <intrigeri@boum.org>2009-01-20 00:54:38 +0100
commitdaaf4885384568822c9a134f28cee667b6940d66 (patch)
tree123b6fbffdab63274de3f026a0098f9331c910ef
parentd79b8f809abc89d954240b2299e4613a8272fc5e (diff)
downloadikiwiki-daaf4885384568822c9a134f28cee667b6940d66.tar
ikiwiki-daaf4885384568822c9a134f28cee667b6940d66.tar.gz
po: let's walk the last steps needed before merge!
Signed-off-by: intrigeri <intrigeri@boum.org>
-rw-r--r--doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn27
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn
index edd665185..af748a8d3 100644
--- a/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn
+++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/po.mdwn
@@ -171,3 +171,30 @@ Any thoughts on this?
I've set this plugin development aside for a while. I will be back and
finish it at some point in the first quarter of 2009. --[[intrigeri]]
+
+> Abstract: Joey, please have a look at my po and meta branches.
+>
+> Detailed progress report:
+>
+> * it seems the po branch in your repository has not been tracking my
+> own po branch for two months. any config issue?
+> * all the plugin's todo items have been completed, robustness tests
+> done
+> * I've finished the detailed security audit, and the fix for po4a
+> bugs has entered upstream CVS last week
+> * I've merged your new `checkcontent` hook with the `cansave` hook
+> I previously introduced in my own branch; blogspam plugin updated
+> accordingly
+> * the rename hook changes we discussed elsewhere are also part of my
+> branch
+> * I've introduced two new hooks (`canremove` and `canrename`), not
+> a big deal; IMHO, they extend quite logically the plugin interface
+> * as highlighted on [[bugs/pagetitle_function_does_not_respect_meta_titles]],
+> my `meta` branch contains a new feature that is really useful in a
+> translatable wiki
+>
+> As a conclusion, I'm feeling that my branches are ready to be
+> merged; only thing missing, I guess, are a bit of discussion and
+> subsequent adjustments.
+>
+> --[[intrigeri]]