aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorjoey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071>2007-04-22 23:59:05 +0000
committerjoey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071>2007-04-22 23:59:05 +0000
commitacfc0452a50338611441f492ed271e83044db39a (patch)
tree09a7027969d019b9107145ea6b41016c3b7ef6aa
parent3d8c1a36b278eb2d385da0204e2ea6673a819807 (diff)
downloadikiwiki-acfc0452a50338611441f492ed271e83044db39a.tar
ikiwiki-acfc0452a50338611441f492ed271e83044db39a.tar.gz
responses
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/supporting_comments_via_disussion_pages.mdwn26
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/supporting_comments_via_disussion_pages.mdwn b/doc/todo/supporting_comments_via_disussion_pages.mdwn
index 146422eaa..1bda19f08 100644
--- a/doc/todo/supporting_comments_via_disussion_pages.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/supporting_comments_via_disussion_pages.mdwn
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
-I would love to see more traditional support for comments in ikiwiki. One way would be to structure data on the discussion page in such a way that a "comment" plugin could parse it and yet the discussion page would still be a valid and usable wiki page.
+I would love to see more traditional support for comments in ikiwiki. One
+way would be to structure data on the discussion page in such a way that a
+"comment" plugin could parse it and yet the discussion page would still be
+a valid and usable wiki page.
For example if the discussion page looked like this:
@@ -16,7 +19,9 @@ For example if the discussion page looked like this:
mauris ut felis. Vestibulum risus nibh, adipiscing volutpat, volutpat et, lacinia ut,
pede. Maecenas dolor. Vivamus feugiat volutpat ligula.
-Each header marks the start of a new comment and the line immediately following is the comments meta data (author, email/url, datestamp). Hopefully you could structure it in such a way that the scope
+Each header marks the start of a new comment and the line immediately
+following is the comments meta data (author, email/url, datestamp).
+Hopefully you could structure it in such a way that the scope
This would allow:
@@ -30,6 +35,19 @@ Is this simple enough to be sensible?
-- [[AdamShand]]
-I've been looking into this. I'd like to implement a "blogcomments" plugin. Looking at the code, I think the way to go is to have a formbuilder_setup hook that uses a different template instead of the standard editpage one. That template would not display the editcontent field. The problem that I'm running into is that I need to append the new content to the old one.
+> Well, if it's going to look like a blog, why not store the data the same
+> way ikiwiki stores blogs, with a separate page per comment? As already
+> suggested in [[discussion_page_as_blog]] though there are some things to
+> be worked out also discussed there.
+> --[[Joey]]
--- [[MarceloMagallon]] \ No newline at end of file
+I've been looking into this. I'd like to implement a "blogcomments"
+plugin. Looking at the code, I think the way to go is to have a
+formbuilder_setup hook that uses a different template instead of the
+standard editpage one. That template would not display the editcontent
+field. The problem that I'm running into is that I need to append the new
+content to the old one.
+
+-- [[MarceloMagallon]]
+
+> Anything I can do to help? --[[Joey]]