aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorhttp://ptecza.myopenid.com/ <http://ptecza.myopenid.com/@web>2008-09-26 05:45:21 -0400
committerJoey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>2008-09-26 05:45:21 -0400
commit585786b0bc7b1576eef194cab7f687332675389c (patch)
tree82026a1492e67ef9f3dd89aaf5a1b801717e01fe
parenta0b53cf26b3d72d06cfa6b20de764ad2d0ae7f06 (diff)
downloadikiwiki-585786b0bc7b1576eef194cab7f687332675389c.tar
ikiwiki-585786b0bc7b1576eef194cab7f687332675389c.tar.gz
* Responses
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/inline:_numerical_ordering_by_title.mdwn10
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/inline:_numerical_ordering_by_title.mdwn b/doc/todo/inline:_numerical_ordering_by_title.mdwn
index d500f2117..95511d998 100644
--- a/doc/todo/inline:_numerical_ordering_by_title.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/inline:_numerical_ordering_by_title.mdwn
@@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ Do you have any idea how to workaround that issue? --[[Paweł|ptecza]]
> Delete all files. Add files back one at a time, committing after adding
> each file. Sort by date. --[[Joey]]
+>> The simplest solutions are the best :D Thanks for the hint! I didn't
+>> want to do it before, because I was affaid that my Subversion keeps
+>> old date of creation of file. --[[Paweł|ptecza]]
+
> Maybe you can rename `9.mdwn` to `09.mdwn`? See `rename(1)`, it renames multiple files
> in one go. --[[buo]]
@@ -52,10 +56,14 @@ I have also 2 considerations for inline sorting:
1. Maybe changing name of `sort` parameter to `sortby` or `sortkey` will
be good idea?
+
> No, that would break existing wikis. --[[Joey]]
+ >> It's no problem. You just have `ikiwiki-transition` utility :D --[[Paweł|ptecza]]
+
1. Maybe you should use `title` sort key for title from meta plugin and `name`,
`filename`, `page` or `pagename` for page names? In the future you can also
sort by meta author, license or another key.
+
> There are many places in ikiwiki that do not use meta title info and
> could. I'd prefer to deal with that issue as a whole, not here,
> --[[Joey]]
@@ -95,6 +103,8 @@ I have also 2 considerations for inline sorting:
> or by date, etc. Adding a separate "sorttype" value is thus fairly
> confusing. --[[Joey]]
+>> OK. I will be more careful when I play with inline plugin :) --[[Paweł|ptecza]]
+
---
Joey, have you forgotten about that request? ;) --[[Paweł|ptecza]]