aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/guix
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>2024-02-18 12:40:13 +0000
committerChristopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>2024-04-03 17:18:38 +0100
commit22fa92cf282d8fc966628f06901b14b676b98478 (patch)
tree87bdc27532702bde0ce3893ceb180e6c8711e800 /guix
parentecbab97f0732d6979642078a7164d4032b2102b8 (diff)
downloadguix-22fa92cf282d8fc966628f06901b14b676b98478.tar
guix-22fa92cf282d8fc966628f06901b14b676b98478.tar.gz
store: database: Remove call-with-savepoint and associated code.
While care does need to be taken with making updates or inserts to the ValidPaths table, I think that trying to ensure this within update-or-insert is the wrong approach. Instead, when working with the store database, only one connection should be used to make changes to the database and those changes should happen in transactions that ideally begin immediately. This reverts commit 37545de4a3bf59611c184b31506fe9a16abe4c8b. * .dir-locals.el (scheme-mode): Remove entries for call-with-savepoint and call-with-retrying-savepoint. * guix/store/database.scm (call-with-savepoint, call-with-retrying-savepoint): Remove procedures. (update-or-insert): Remove use of call-with-savepoint. Change-Id: I2f986e8623d8235a90c40d5f219c1292c1ab157b
Diffstat (limited to 'guix')
-rw-r--r--guix/store/database.scm75
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 62 deletions
diff --git a/guix/store/database.scm b/guix/store/database.scm
index 2968f13492..3093fd816a 100644
--- a/guix/store/database.scm
+++ b/guix/store/database.scm
@@ -151,39 +151,11 @@ times. This may reduce contention for the database somewhat."
(false-if-exception (exec "rollback;"))
(apply throw args))))
-(define* (call-with-savepoint db proc
- #:optional (savepoint-name "SomeSavepoint"))
- "Call PROC after creating a savepoint named SAVEPOINT-NAME. If PROC exits
-abnormally, rollback to that savepoint. In all cases, remove the savepoint
-prior to returning."
- (define (exec sql)
- (with-statement db sql stmt
- (sqlite-fold cons '() stmt)))
-
- (dynamic-wind
- (lambda ()
- (exec (string-append "SAVEPOINT " savepoint-name ";")))
- (lambda ()
- (catch #t
- proc
- (lambda args
- (exec (string-append "ROLLBACK TO " savepoint-name ";"))
- (apply throw args))))
- (lambda ()
- (exec (string-append "RELEASE " savepoint-name ";")))))
-
(define* (call-with-retrying-transaction db proc #:key restartable?)
(call-with-SQLITE_BUSY-retrying
(lambda ()
(call-with-transaction db proc #:restartable? restartable?))))
-(define* (call-with-retrying-savepoint db proc
- #:optional (savepoint-name
- "SomeSavepoint"))
- (call-with-SQLITE_BUSY-retrying
- (lambda ()
- (call-with-savepoint db proc savepoint-name))))
-
(define %default-database-file
;; Default location of the store database.
(string-append %store-database-directory "/db.sqlite"))
@@ -261,40 +233,19 @@ of course. Returns the row id of the row that was modified or inserted."
(assert-integer "update-or-insert" positive? #:nar-size nar-size)
(assert-integer "update-or-insert" (cut >= <> 0) #:time time)
- ;; It's important that querying the path-id and the insert/update operation
- ;; take place in the same transaction, as otherwise some other
- ;; process/thread/fiber could register the same path between when we check
- ;; whether it's already registered and when we register it, resulting in
- ;; duplicate paths (which, due to a 'unique' constraint, would cause an
- ;; exception to be thrown). With the default journaling mode this will
- ;; prevent writes from occurring during that sensitive time, but with WAL
- ;; mode it will instead arrange to return SQLITE_BUSY when a write occurs
- ;; between the start of a read transaction and its upgrading to a write
- ;; transaction (see https://sqlite.org/rescode.html#busy_snapshot).
- ;; Experimentally, it seems this SQLITE_BUSY will ignore a busy_timeout and
- ;; immediately return (makes sense, since waiting won't change anything).
-
- ;; Note that when that kind of SQLITE_BUSY error is returned, it will keep
- ;; being returned every time we try to upgrade the same outermost
- ;; transaction to a write transaction. So when retrying, we have to restart
- ;; the *outermost* write transaction. We can't inherently tell whether
- ;; we're the outermost write transaction, so we leave the retry-handling to
- ;; the caller.
- (call-with-savepoint db
- (lambda ()
- (let ((id (path-id db path)))
- (if id
- (with-statement db update-sql stmt
- (sqlite-bind-arguments stmt #:id id
- #:deriver deriver
- #:hash hash #:size nar-size #:time time)
- (sqlite-fold cons '() stmt))
- (with-statement db insert-sql stmt
- (sqlite-bind-arguments stmt
- #:path path #:deriver deriver
- #:hash hash #:size nar-size #:time time)
- (sqlite-fold cons '() stmt)))
- (last-insert-row-id db)))))
+ (let ((id (path-id db path)))
+ (if id
+ (with-statement db update-sql stmt
+ (sqlite-bind-arguments stmt #:id id
+ #:deriver deriver
+ #:hash hash #:size nar-size #:time time)
+ (sqlite-fold cons '() stmt))
+ (with-statement db insert-sql stmt
+ (sqlite-bind-arguments stmt
+ #:path path #:deriver deriver
+ #:hash hash #:size nar-size #:time time)
+ (sqlite-fold cons '() stmt)))
+ (last-insert-row-id db)))
(define add-reference-sql
"INSERT OR REPLACE INTO Refs (referrer, reference) VALUES (:referrer, :reference);")