blob: 988b4b96cfbd2fdc391d6b7720efd3f39fdbd642 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
|
Filename: 123-autonaming.txt
Title: Naming authorities automatically create bindings
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Peter Palfrader
Created: 2007-10-11
Status: Open
Overview:
Tor's directory authorities can give certain servers a "Named" flag
in the network-status entry, when they want to bind that nickname to
that identity key. This allows clients to specify a nickname rather
than an identity fingerprint and still be certain they're getting the
"right" server.
Authority operators name a server by adding their nickname and
identity fingerprint to the 'approved-routers' file. Historically
being listed in the file was required for a router, at first for being
listed in the directory at all, and later in order to be used by
clients as a first or last hop of a circuit.
Adding identities to the list of named routers so far has been a
manual, time consuming, and boring job. Given that and the fact that
the Tor network works just fine without named routers the last
authority to keep a current binding list stopped updating it well over
half a year ago.
Naming, if it were done, would serve a useful purpose however in that
users can have a reasonable expectation that the exit server Bob they
are using in their http://www.google.com.bob.exit/ URL is the same
Bob every time.
Proposal:
I propose that identity<->name binding be completely automated:
New bindings should be added after the router has been around for a
bit and their name has not been used by other routers, similarly names
that have not appeared on the network for a long time should be freed
in case a new router wants to use it.
The following rules are suggested:
i) If a named router has not been online for half a year, the
identity<->name binding for that name is removed. The nickname
is free to be taken by other routers now.
ii) If a router claims a certain nickname and
a) has been on the network for at least two weeks, and
b) that nickname is not yet linked to a different router, and
c) no other router has wanted that nickname in the last month,
a new binding should be created for this router and its desired
nickname.
This automaton does not necessarily need to live in the Tor code, it
can do its job just as well when it's an external tool.
|