aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/changes/bug11553
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>2014-04-18 12:50:04 -0400
committerNick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>2014-04-18 12:58:58 -0400
commit0d75344b0e0eafc89db89a974e87b16564cd8f0a (patch)
treec5dbe44f5b4ddbfa0855ce8cb3066c1095384d3a /changes/bug11553
parentbb9b4c37f8e7f5cf78918f382e90d8b11ff42551 (diff)
downloadtor-0d75344b0e0eafc89db89a974e87b16564cd8f0a.tar
tor-0d75344b0e0eafc89db89a974e87b16564cd8f0a.tar.gz
Switch to random allocation on circuitIDs.
Fixes a possible root cause of 11553 by only making 64 attempts at most to pick a circuitID. Previously, we would test every possible circuit ID until we found one or ran out. This algorithm succeeds probabilistically. As the comment says: This potentially causes us to give up early if our circuit ID space is nearly full. If we have N circuit IDs in use, then we will reject a new circuit with probability (N / max_range) ^ MAX_CIRCID_ATTEMPTS. This means that in practice, a few percent of our circuit ID capacity will go unused. The alternative here, though, is to do a linear search over the whole circuit ID space every time we extend a circuit, which is not so great either. This makes new vs old clients distinguishable, so we should try to batch it with other patches that do that, like 11438.
Diffstat (limited to 'changes/bug11553')
-rw-r--r--changes/bug1155310
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/changes/bug11553 b/changes/bug11553
index 1540f4642..ed30ce985 100644
--- a/changes/bug11553
+++ b/changes/bug11553
@@ -3,3 +3,13 @@
warning for the whole channel, and include a description of
how many circuits there were on the channel. Fix for part of ticket
#11553.
+
+
+ o Major features (performance):
+ - Avoid wasting cycles looking for usable circuit IDs. Previously,
+ when allocating a new circuit ID, we would in the worst case do a
+ linear scan over the entire possible range of circuit IDs before
+ deciding that we had exhausted our possibilities. Now, we
+ try 64 circuit IDs at random before deciding that we probably
+ won't succeed. Fix for a possible root cause of ticket
+ #11553.