aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoger Dingledine <arma@torproject.org>2003-03-18 03:27:47 +0000
committerRoger Dingledine <arma@torproject.org>2003-03-18 03:27:47 +0000
commitf9c541bfcf886248e809d198b19fb1e2e97b924e (patch)
treec9e0ef4c2a20be47dfc9aed32028eb26ee048515
parent64e46988f65176c0a12700e24b7738b26fd2cdd0 (diff)
downloadtor-f9c541bfcf886248e809d198b19fb1e2e97b924e.tar
tor-f9c541bfcf886248e809d198b19fb1e2e97b924e.tar.gz
remove faq and hacking files too. they're now in doc.
svn:r193
-rw-r--r--FAQ110
-rw-r--r--HACKING117
2 files changed, 0 insertions, 227 deletions
diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ
deleted file mode 100644
index 1c49f8362..000000000
--- a/FAQ
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,110 +0,0 @@
-The Onion Routing (TOR) Frequently Asked Questions
---------------------------------------------------
-
-1. General.
-
-1.1. What is tor?
-
-Tor is an implementation of version 2 of Onion Routing.
-
-Onion Routing is a connection-oriented anonymizing communication
-service. Users build a layered block of asymmetric encryptions which
-describes a source-routed path through a set of nodes. Those nodes
-build a "virtual circuit," in which each node knows its predecessor and
-successor, but no others. Traffic flowing down the circuit is unwrapped
-by a symmetric key at each node which reveals the downstream node.
-
-Basically tor provides a distributed network of servers ('onion
-routers'). Users bounce their tcp streams (web traffic, ftp, ssh, etc)
-around the routers, and recipients, observers, and even the routers
-themselves have difficulty tracking the source of the stream.
-
-1.2. Why's it called tor?
-
-Because tor is the onion routing system. I kept telling people I was
-working on onion routing, and they said "Neat. Which one?" Even if onion
-routing has become a standard household term, this is the actual onion
-routing project, started out of the Naval Research Lab.
-
-(Theories about recursive acronyms are ok too.)
-
-
-2. Compiling and installing.
-
-[Read the README file for now; check back here once we've got packages/etc
-for you.]
-
-
-3. Running tor.
-
-3.1. What's this about roles? What kind of server should I run?
-
-The same executable ("or") functions as both client and server, depending
-on the value of the config variable named 'Role'. Role represents a
-combination of which tasks this particular tor server will do. The default
-Role (role 15) is an onion router: it listens for onion routers, listens
-for onion proxies, listens for application proxies, and it connects to
-all other onion routers it learns about. A directory server (role 63)
-does all of the above and also serves directory requests. A simple
-onion proxy, on the other hand (role 8), only listens for application
-proxies. See part 3.1 of the HACKING document for more technical details.
-
-3.2. So I can just run a full onion router and join the network?
-
-No. Users should run just an onion proxy (use the 'oprc' config file).
-If you start up a full onion router, the rest of the routers in the
-system won't recognize you, so they will reject your handshake attempts.
-
-3.3. How do I join the network then?
-
-If you just want to use the onion routing network, you can run a proxy
-and you're all set. If you want to run a router, you must convince
-the directory server operators (currently arma@mit.edu) that you're a
-trustworthy person. From there, the operators add you to the directory,
-which propagates out to the rest of the network. All nodes will know
-about you within an hour.
-
-3.4. I want to run a directory server too.
-
-If you run a very reliable node, you plan to be around for a long time,
-and you want to spend some time ensuring that router operators are
-people we know and like, we may want you to run a directory server
-too. We must manually add you to the 'dirservers' file that's part of
-the distribution; users will only know about you when they upgrade to
-a new version. Of course, you can always just start up your router as a
-directory server too --- but users won't know to ask you for directories,
-and more importantly, you'll never learn from the real directory servers
-about recently joined routers.
-
-
-4. Development.
-
-4.1. Who's doing this?
-
-4.2. Can I help?
-
-4.3. I've got a bug.
-
-
-5. Anonymity.
-
-5.1. So I'm totally anonymous if I use tor?
-
-5.2. Where can I learn more about anonymity?
-
-
-6. Comparison to related projects.
-
-6.1. Onion Routing.
-
-Tor *is* onion routing.
-
-6.2. Freedom.
-
-
-7. Protocol and application support.
-
-7.1. http? ftp? udp? socks? mozilla?
-
-
-
diff --git a/HACKING b/HACKING
deleted file mode 100644
index 421b32f90..000000000
--- a/HACKING
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,117 +0,0 @@
-
-0. Intro.
-Onion Routing is still very much in development stages. This document
-aims to get you started in the right direction if you want to understand
-the code, add features, fix bugs, etc.
-
-Read the README file first, so you can get familiar with the basics.
-
-1. The programs.
-
-1.1. "or". This is the main program here. It functions as both a server
-and a client, depending on which config file you give it. ...
-
-2. The pieces.
-
-2.1. Routers. Onion routers, as far as the 'or' program is concerned,
-are a bunch of data items that are loaded into the router_array when
-the program starts. After it's loaded, the router information is never
-changed. When a new OR connection is started (see below), the relevant
-information is copied from the router struct to the connection struct.
-
-2.2. Connections. A connection is a long-standing tcp socket between
-nodes. A connection is named based on what it's connected to -- an "OR
-connection" has an onion router on the other end, an "OP connection" has
-an onion proxy on the other end, an "exit connection" has a website or
-other server on the other end, and an "AP connection" has an application
-proxy (and thus a user) on the other end.
-
-2.3. Circuits. A circuit is a single conversation between two
-participants over the onion routing network. One end of the circuit has
-an AP connection, and the other end has an exit connection. AP and exit
-connections have only one circuit associated with them (and thus these
-connection types are closed when the circuit is closed), whereas OP and
-OR connections multiplex many circuits at once, and stay standing even
-when there are no circuits running over them.
-
-2.4. Cells. Some connections, specifically OR and OP connections, speak
-"cells". This means that data over that connection is bundled into 128
-byte packets (8 bytes of header and 120 bytes of payload). Each cell has
-a type, or "command", which indicates what it's for.
-
-
-3. Important parameters in the code.
-
-3.1. Role.
-
-
-4. Robustness features.
-
-4.1. Bandwidth throttling. Each cell-speaking connection has a maximum
-bandwidth it can use, as specified in the routers.or file. Bandwidth
-throttling occurs on both the sender side and the receiving side. The
-sending side sends cells at regularly spaced intervals (e.g., a connection
-with a bandwidth of 12800B/s would queue a cell every 10ms). The receiving
-side protects against misbehaving servers that send cells more frequently,
-by using a simple token bucket:
-
-Each connection has a token bucket with a specified capacity. Tokens are
-added to the bucket each second (when the bucket is full, new tokens
-are discarded.) Each token represents permission to receive one byte
-from the network --- to receive a byte, the connection must remove a
-token from the bucket. Thus if the bucket is empty, that connection must
-wait until more tokens arrive. The number of tokens we add enforces a
-longterm average rate of incoming bytes, yet we still permit short-term
-bursts above the allowed bandwidth. Currently bucket sizes are set to
-ten seconds worth of traffic.
-
-The bandwidth throttling uses TCP to push back when we stop reading.
-We extend it with token buckets to allow more flexibility for traffic
-bursts.
-
-4.2. Data congestion control. Even with the above bandwidth throttling,
-we still need to worry about congestion, either accidental or intentional.
-If a lot of people make circuits into same node, and they all come out
-through the same connection, then that connection may become saturated
-(be unable to send out data cells as quickly as it wants to). An adversary
-can make a 'put' request through the onion routing network to a webserver
-he owns, and then refuse to read any of the bytes at the webserver end
-of the circuit. These bottlenecks can propagate back through the entire
-network, mucking up everything.
-
-To handle this congestion, each circuit starts out with a receive
-window at each node of 100 cells -- it is willing to receive at most 100
-cells on that circuit. (It handles each direction separately; so that's
-really 100 cells forward and 100 cells back.) The edge of the circuit
-is willing to create at most 100 cells from data coming from outside the
-onion routing network. Nodes in the middle of the circuit will tear down
-the circuit if a data cell arrives when the receive window is 0. When
-data has traversed the network, the edge node buffers it on its outbuf,
-and evaluates whether to respond with a 'sendme' acknowledgement: if its
-outbuf is not too full, and its receive window is less than 90, then it
-queues a 'sendme' cell backwards in the circuit. Each node that receives
-the sendme increments its window by 10 and passes the cell onward.
-
-In practice, all the nodes in the circuit maintain a receive window
-close to 100 except the exit node, which stays around 0, periodically
-receiving a sendme and reading 10 more data cells from the webserver.
-In this way we can use pretty much all of the available bandwidth for
-data, but gracefully back off when faced with multiple circuits (a new
-sendme arrives only after some cells have traversed the entire network),
-stalled network connections, or attacks.
-
-We don't need to reimplement full tcp windows, with sequence numbers,
-the ability to drop cells when we're full etc, because the tcp streams
-already guarantee in-order delivery of each cell. Rather than trying
-to build some sort of tcp-on-tcp scheme, we implement this minimal data
-congestion control; so far it's enough.
-
-4.3. Router twins. In many cases when we ask for a router with a given
-address and port, we really mean a router who knows a given key. Router
-twins are two or more routers that all share the same private key. We thus
-give routers extra flexibility in choosing the next hop in the circuit: if
-some of the twins are down or slow, it can choose the more available ones.
-
-Currently the code tries for the primary router first, and if it's down,
-chooses the first available twin.
-