aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>2012-09-11 17:51:36 -0400
committerNick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>2012-09-11 17:51:36 -0400
commit75c9ccd4f851bac6d32cb08ded557ac207bc8002 (patch)
tree0edd289ca5453ebfad30d52bc55665bad1e76fe0
parentb8f93c5dd7a069c9e5ac3469d067a31c3992fa25 (diff)
parent9982122f3448293e80adf83cb28c7ab66bc04da9 (diff)
downloadtor-75c9ccd4f851bac6d32cb08ded557ac207bc8002.tar
tor-75c9ccd4f851bac6d32cb08ded557ac207bc8002.tar.gz
Merge remote-tracking branch 'public/bug6538'
Conflicts: configure.ac
-rw-r--r--changes/bug653816
-rw-r--r--configure.ac1
-rw-r--r--src/common/util.c17
-rw-r--r--src/common/util.h1
-rw-r--r--src/or/routerlist.c312
-rw-r--r--src/or/routerlist.h14
-rw-r--r--src/test/test.h4
-rw-r--r--src/test/test_dir.c123
8 files changed, 331 insertions, 157 deletions
diff --git a/changes/bug6538 b/changes/bug6538
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..03c168b60
--- /dev/null
+++ b/changes/bug6538
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+ o Minor bugfixes:
+ - Switch weighted node selection rule from using a list of doubles
+ to using a list of int64_t. This should make the process slightly
+ easier to debug and maintain. Needed for fix for bug 6538.
+
+ o Security features:
+ - Switch to a completely time-invariant approach for picking nodes
+ weighted by bandwidth. Our old approach would run through the
+ part of the loop after it had made its choice slightly slower
+ than it ran through the part of the loop before it had made its
+ choice. Fix for bug 6538.
+
+ o Code simplifications and refactoring:
+ - Move the core of our "choose a weighted element at random" logic
+ into its own function, and give it unit tests. Now the logic is
+ testable, and a little less fragile too.
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index ab291b11c..7f3382866 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ AC_CHECK_FUNCS(
inet_aton \
ioctl \
issetugid \
+ llround \
localtime_r \
lround \
memmem \
diff --git a/src/common/util.c b/src/common/util.c
index c2dfb5432..e79e73a0f 100644
--- a/src/common/util.c
+++ b/src/common/util.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ tor_mathlog(double d)
}
/** Return the long integer closest to d. We define this wrapper here so
- * that not all users of math.h need to use the right incancations to get
+ * that not all users of math.h need to use the right intancations to get
* the c99 functions. */
long
tor_lround(double d)
@@ -347,6 +347,21 @@ tor_lround(double d)
#endif
}
+/** Return the 64-bit integer closest to d. We define this wrapper here so
+ * that not all users of math.h need to use the right incantations to get the
+ * c99 functions. */
+int64_t
+tor_llround(double d)
+{
+#if defined(HAVE_LLROUND)
+ return (int64_t)llround(d);
+#elif defined(HAVE_RINT)
+ return (int64_t)rint(d);
+#else
+ return (int64_t)(d > 0 ? d + 0.5 : ceil(d - 0.5));
+#endif
+}
+
/** Returns floor(log2(u64)). If u64 is 0, (incorrectly) returns 0. */
int
tor_log2(uint64_t u64)
diff --git a/src/common/util.h b/src/common/util.h
index 3388759b3..04812df7c 100644
--- a/src/common/util.h
+++ b/src/common/util.h
@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ void tor_log_mallinfo(int severity);
/* Math functions */
double tor_mathlog(double d) ATTR_CONST;
long tor_lround(double d) ATTR_CONST;
+int64_t tor_llround(double d) ATTR_CONST;
int tor_log2(uint64_t u64) ATTR_CONST;
uint64_t round_to_power_of_2(uint64_t u64);
unsigned round_to_next_multiple_of(unsigned number, unsigned divisor);
diff --git a/src/or/routerlist.c b/src/or/routerlist.c
index d904a629b..41abc4c87 100644
--- a/src/or/routerlist.c
+++ b/src/or/routerlist.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
* servers.
**/
+#define ROUTERLIST_PRIVATE
#include "or.h"
#include "circuitbuild.h"
#include "config.h"
@@ -1647,6 +1648,92 @@ router_get_advertised_bandwidth_capped(const routerinfo_t *router)
return result;
}
+/** Given an array of double/uint64_t unions that are currently being used as
+ * doubles, convert them to uint64_t, and try to scale them linearly so as to
+ * much of the range of uint64_t. If <b>total_out</b> is provided, set it to
+ * the sum of all elements in the array _before_ scaling. */
+/* private */ void
+scale_array_elements_to_u64(u64_dbl_t *entries, int n_entries,
+ uint64_t *total_out)
+{
+ double total = 0.0;
+ double scale_factor;
+ int i;
+ /* big, but far away from overflowing an int64_t */
+#define SCALE_TO_U64_MAX (INT64_MAX / 4)
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n_entries; ++i)
+ total += entries[i].dbl;
+
+ scale_factor = SCALE_TO_U64_MAX / total;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n_entries; ++i)
+ entries[i].u64 = tor_llround(entries[i].dbl * scale_factor);
+
+ if (total_out)
+ *total_out = (uint64_t) total;
+
+#undef SCALE_TO_U64_MAX
+}
+
+/** Time-invariant 64-bit greater-than; works on two integers in the range
+ * (0,INT64_MAX). */
+#if SIZEOF_VOID_P == 8
+#define gt_i64_timei(a,b) ((a) > (b))
+#else
+static INLINE int
+gt_i64_timei(uint64_t a, uint64_t b)
+{
+ int64_t diff = (int64_t) (b - a);
+ int res = diff >> 63;
+ return res & 1;
+}
+#endif
+
+/** Pick a random element of <b>n_entries</b>-element array <b>entries</b>,
+ * choosing each element with a probability proportional to its (uint64_t)
+ * value, and return the index of that element. If all elements are 0, choose
+ * an index at random. Return -1 on error.
+ */
+/* private */ int
+choose_array_element_by_weight(const u64_dbl_t *entries, int n_entries)
+{
+ int i, i_chosen=-1, n_chosen=0;
+ uint64_t total_so_far = 0;
+ uint64_t rand_val;
+ uint64_t total = 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n_entries; ++i)
+ total += entries[i].u64;
+
+ if (n_entries < 1)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (total == 0)
+ return crypto_rand_int(n_entries);
+
+ tor_assert(total < INT64_MAX);
+
+ rand_val = crypto_rand_uint64(total);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n_entries; ++i) {
+ total_so_far += entries[i].u64;
+ if (gt_i64_timei(total_so_far, rand_val)) {
+ i_chosen = i;
+ n_chosen++;
+ /* Set rand_val to INT64_MAX rather than stopping the loop. This way,
+ * the time we spend in the loop does not leak which element we chose. */
+ rand_val = INT64_MAX;
+ }
+ }
+ tor_assert(total_so_far == total);
+ tor_assert(n_chosen == 1);
+ tor_assert(i_chosen >= 0);
+ tor_assert(i_chosen < n_entries);
+
+ return i_chosen;
+}
+
/** When weighting bridges, enforce these values as lower and upper
* bound for believable bandwidth, because there is no way for us
* to verify a bridge's bandwidth currently. */
@@ -1697,16 +1784,10 @@ smartlist_choose_node_by_bandwidth_weights(smartlist_t *sl,
bandwidth_weight_rule_t rule)
{
int64_t weight_scale;
- int64_t rand_bw;
double Wg = -1, Wm = -1, We = -1, Wd = -1;
double Wgb = -1, Wmb = -1, Web = -1, Wdb = -1;
- double weighted_bw = 0, unweighted_bw = 0;
- double *bandwidths;
- double tmp = 0;
- unsigned int i;
- unsigned int i_chosen;
- unsigned int i_has_been_chosen;
- int have_unknown = 0; /* true iff sl contains element not in consensus. */
+ uint64_t weighted_bw = 0;
+ u64_dbl_t *bandwidths;
/* Can't choose exit and guard at same time */
tor_assert(rule == NO_WEIGHTING ||
@@ -1787,7 +1868,7 @@ smartlist_choose_node_by_bandwidth_weights(smartlist_t *sl,
Web /= weight_scale;
Wdb /= weight_scale;
- bandwidths = tor_malloc_zero(sizeof(double)*smartlist_len(sl));
+ bandwidths = tor_malloc_zero(sizeof(u64_dbl_t)*smartlist_len(sl));
// Cycle through smartlist and total the bandwidth.
SMARTLIST_FOREACH_BEGIN(sl, const node_t *, node) {
@@ -1810,7 +1891,6 @@ smartlist_choose_node_by_bandwidth_weights(smartlist_t *sl,
} else if (node->ri) {
/* bridge or other descriptor not in our consensus */
this_bw = bridge_get_advertised_bandwidth_bounded(node->ri);
- have_unknown = 1;
} else {
/* We can't use this one. */
continue;
@@ -1826,72 +1906,32 @@ smartlist_choose_node_by_bandwidth_weights(smartlist_t *sl,
} else { // middle
weight = (is_dir ? Wmb*Wm : Wm);
}
-
- bandwidths[node_sl_idx] = weight*this_bw;
- weighted_bw += weight*this_bw;
- unweighted_bw += this_bw;
+ /* These should be impossible; but overflows here would be bad, so let's
+ * make sure. */
+ if (this_bw < 0)
+ this_bw = 0;
+ if (weight < 0.0)
+ weight = 0.0;
+
+ bandwidths[node_sl_idx].dbl = weight*this_bw + 0.5;
if (is_me)
- sl_last_weighted_bw_of_me = weight*this_bw;
+ sl_last_weighted_bw_of_me = (uint64_t) bandwidths[node_sl_idx].dbl;
} SMARTLIST_FOREACH_END(node);
- /* XXXX this is a kludge to expose these values. */
- sl_last_total_weighted_bw = weighted_bw;
-
log_debug(LD_CIRC, "Choosing node for rule %s based on weights "
- "Wg=%f Wm=%f We=%f Wd=%f with total bw %f",
+ "Wg=%f Wm=%f We=%f Wd=%f with total bw "U64_FORMAT,
bandwidth_weight_rule_to_string(rule),
- Wg, Wm, We, Wd, weighted_bw);
-
- /* If there is no bandwidth, choose at random */
- if (DBL_TO_U64(weighted_bw) == 0) {
- /* Don't warn when using bridges/relays not in the consensus */
- if (!have_unknown) {
-#define ZERO_BANDWIDTH_WARNING_INTERVAL (15)
- static ratelim_t zero_bandwidth_warning_limit =
- RATELIM_INIT(ZERO_BANDWIDTH_WARNING_INTERVAL);
- char *msg;
- if ((msg = rate_limit_log(&zero_bandwidth_warning_limit,
- approx_time()))) {
- log_warn(LD_CIRC,
- "Weighted bandwidth is %f in node selection for rule %s "
- "(unweighted was %f) %s",
- weighted_bw, bandwidth_weight_rule_to_string(rule),
- unweighted_bw, msg);
- }
- }
- tor_free(bandwidths);
- return smartlist_choose(sl);
- }
+ Wg, Wm, We, Wd, U64_PRINTF_ARG(weighted_bw));
- rand_bw = crypto_rand_uint64(DBL_TO_U64(weighted_bw));
- rand_bw++; /* crypto_rand_uint64() counts from 0, and we need to count
- * from 1 below. See bug 1203 for details. */
+ scale_array_elements_to_u64(bandwidths, smartlist_len(sl),
+ &sl_last_total_weighted_bw);
- /* Last, count through sl until we get to the element we picked */
- i_chosen = (unsigned)smartlist_len(sl);
- i_has_been_chosen = 0;
- tmp = 0.0;
- for (i=0; i < (unsigned)smartlist_len(sl); i++) {
- tmp += bandwidths[i];
- if (tmp >= rand_bw && !i_has_been_chosen) {
- i_chosen = i;
- i_has_been_chosen = 1;
- }
- }
- i = i_chosen;
-
- if (i == (unsigned)smartlist_len(sl)) {
- /* This was once possible due to round-off error, but shouldn't be able
- * to occur any longer. */
- tor_fragile_assert();
- --i;
- log_warn(LD_BUG, "Round-off error in computing bandwidth had an effect on "
- " which router we chose. Please tell the developers. "
- "%f " U64_FORMAT " %f", tmp, U64_PRINTF_ARG(rand_bw),
- weighted_bw);
+ {
+ int idx = choose_array_element_by_weight(bandwidths,
+ smartlist_len(sl));
+ tor_free(bandwidths);
+ return idx < 0 ? NULL : smartlist_get(sl, idx);
}
- tor_free(bandwidths);
- return smartlist_get(sl, i);
}
/** Helper function:
@@ -1912,17 +1952,16 @@ smartlist_choose_node_by_bandwidth(smartlist_t *sl,
bandwidth_weight_rule_t rule)
{
unsigned int i;
- unsigned int i_chosen;
- unsigned int i_has_been_chosen;
- int32_t *bandwidths;
+ u64_dbl_t *bandwidths;
int is_exit;
int is_guard;
- uint64_t total_nonexit_bw = 0, total_exit_bw = 0, total_bw = 0;
- uint64_t total_nonguard_bw = 0, total_guard_bw = 0;
- uint64_t rand_bw, tmp;
+ int is_fast;
+ double total_nonexit_bw = 0, total_exit_bw = 0;
+ double total_nonguard_bw = 0, total_guard_bw = 0;
double exit_weight;
double guard_weight;
int n_unknown = 0;
+ bitarray_t *fast_bits;
bitarray_t *exit_bits;
bitarray_t *guard_bits;
int me_idx = -1;
@@ -1946,10 +1985,9 @@ smartlist_choose_node_by_bandwidth(smartlist_t *sl,
}
/* First count the total bandwidth weight, and make a list
- * of each value. <0 means "unknown; no routerinfo." We use the
- * bits of negative values to remember whether the router was fast (-x)&1
- * and whether it was an exit (-x)&2 or guard (-x)&4. Yes, it's a hack. */
- bandwidths = tor_malloc(sizeof(int32_t)*smartlist_len(sl));
+ * of each value. We use UINT64_MAX to indicate "unknown". */
+ bandwidths = tor_malloc_zero(sizeof(u64_dbl_t)*smartlist_len(sl));
+ fast_bits = bitarray_init_zero(smartlist_len(sl));
exit_bits = bitarray_init_zero(smartlist_len(sl));
guard_bits = bitarray_init_zero(smartlist_len(sl));
@@ -1957,7 +1995,6 @@ smartlist_choose_node_by_bandwidth(smartlist_t *sl,
SMARTLIST_FOREACH_BEGIN(sl, const node_t *, node) {
/* first, learn what bandwidth we think i has */
int is_known = 1;
- int32_t flags = 0;
uint32_t this_bw = 0;
i = node_sl_idx;
@@ -1970,12 +2007,7 @@ smartlist_choose_node_by_bandwidth(smartlist_t *sl,
if (node->rs->has_bandwidth) {
this_bw = kb_to_bytes(node->rs->bandwidth);
} else { /* guess */
- /* XXX024 once consensuses always list bandwidths, we can take
- * this guessing business out. -RD */
is_known = 0;
- flags = node->rs->is_fast ? 1 : 0;
- flags |= is_exit ? 2 : 0;
- flags |= is_guard ? 4 : 0;
}
} else if (node->ri) {
/* Must be a bridge if we're willing to use it */
@@ -1986,12 +2018,11 @@ smartlist_choose_node_by_bandwidth(smartlist_t *sl,
bitarray_set(exit_bits, i);
if (is_guard)
bitarray_set(guard_bits, i);
+ if (node->is_fast)
+ bitarray_set(fast_bits, i);
+
if (is_known) {
- bandwidths[i] = (int32_t) this_bw;
- /* Casting this_bw to int32_t is safe because both kb_to_bytes
- and bridge_get_advertised_bandwidth_bounded limit it to below
- INT32_MAX. */
- tor_assert(bandwidths[i] >= 0);
+ bandwidths[i].dbl = this_bw;
if (is_guard)
total_guard_bw += this_bw;
else
@@ -2002,14 +2033,16 @@ smartlist_choose_node_by_bandwidth(smartlist_t *sl,
total_nonexit_bw += this_bw;
} else {
++n_unknown;
- bandwidths[node_sl_idx] = -flags;
+ bandwidths[i].dbl = -1.0;
}
} SMARTLIST_FOREACH_END(node);
+#define EPSILON .1
+
/* Now, fill in the unknown values. */
if (n_unknown) {
int32_t avg_fast, avg_slow;
- if (total_exit_bw+total_nonexit_bw) {
+ if (total_exit_bw+total_nonexit_bw < EPSILON) {
/* if there's some bandwidth, there's at least one known router,
* so no worries about div by 0 here */
int n_known = smartlist_len(sl)-n_unknown;
@@ -2020,26 +2053,27 @@ smartlist_choose_node_by_bandwidth(smartlist_t *sl,
avg_slow = 20000;
}
for (i=0; i<(unsigned)smartlist_len(sl); ++i) {
- int32_t bw = bandwidths[i];
- if (bw>=0)
+ if (bandwidths[i].dbl >= 0.0)
continue;
- is_exit = ((-bw)&2);
- is_guard = ((-bw)&4);
- bandwidths[i] = ((-bw)&1) ? avg_fast : avg_slow;
+ is_fast = bitarray_is_set(fast_bits, i);
+ is_exit = bitarray_is_set(exit_bits, i);
+ is_guard = bitarray_is_set(guard_bits, i);
+ bandwidths[i].dbl = is_fast ? avg_fast : avg_slow;
if (is_exit)
- total_exit_bw += bandwidths[i];
+ total_exit_bw += bandwidths[i].dbl;
else
- total_nonexit_bw += bandwidths[i];
+ total_nonexit_bw += bandwidths[i].dbl;
if (is_guard)
- total_guard_bw += bandwidths[i];
+ total_guard_bw += bandwidths[i].dbl;
else
- total_nonguard_bw += bandwidths[i];
+ total_nonguard_bw += bandwidths[i].dbl;
}
}
/* If there's no bandwidth at all, pick at random. */
- if (!(total_exit_bw+total_nonexit_bw)) {
+ if (total_exit_bw+total_nonexit_bw < EPSILON) {
tor_free(bandwidths);
+ tor_free(fast_bits);
tor_free(exit_bits);
tor_free(guard_bits);
return smartlist_choose(sl);
@@ -2054,12 +2088,12 @@ smartlist_choose_node_by_bandwidth(smartlist_t *sl,
* For detailed derivation of this formula, see
* http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Jul-2007/msg00056.html
*/
- if (rule == WEIGHT_FOR_EXIT || !total_exit_bw)
+ if (rule == WEIGHT_FOR_EXIT || total_exit_bw<EPSILON)
exit_weight = 1.0;
else
exit_weight = 1.0 - all_bw/(3.0*exit_bw);
- if (rule == WEIGHT_FOR_GUARD || !total_guard_bw)
+ if (rule == WEIGHT_FOR_GUARD || total_guard_bw<EPSILON)
guard_weight = 1.0;
else
guard_weight = 1.0 - all_bw/(3.0*guard_bw);
@@ -2070,29 +2104,25 @@ smartlist_choose_node_by_bandwidth(smartlist_t *sl,
if (guard_weight <= 0.0)
guard_weight = 0.0;
- total_bw = 0;
sl_last_weighted_bw_of_me = 0;
for (i=0; i < (unsigned)smartlist_len(sl); i++) {
- uint64_t bw;
+ tor_assert(bandwidths[i].dbl >= 0.0);
+
is_exit = bitarray_is_set(exit_bits, i);
is_guard = bitarray_is_set(guard_bits, i);
if (is_exit && is_guard)
- bw = ((uint64_t)(bandwidths[i] * exit_weight * guard_weight));
+ bandwidths[i].dbl *= exit_weight * guard_weight;
else if (is_guard)
- bw = ((uint64_t)(bandwidths[i] * guard_weight));
+ bandwidths[i].dbl *= guard_weight;
else if (is_exit)
- bw = ((uint64_t)(bandwidths[i] * exit_weight));
- else
- bw = bandwidths[i];
- total_bw += bw;
+ bandwidths[i].dbl *= exit_weight;
+
if (i == (unsigned) me_idx)
- sl_last_weighted_bw_of_me = bw;
+ sl_last_weighted_bw_of_me = (uint64_t) bandwidths[i].dbl;
}
}
- /* XXXX this is a kludge to expose these values. */
- sl_last_total_weighted_bw = total_bw;
-
+#if 0
log_debug(LD_CIRC, "Total weighted bw = "U64_FORMAT
", exit bw = "U64_FORMAT
", nonexit bw = "U64_FORMAT", exit weight = %f "
@@ -2105,50 +2135,20 @@ smartlist_choose_node_by_bandwidth(smartlist_t *sl,
exit_weight, (int)(rule == WEIGHT_FOR_EXIT),
U64_PRINTF_ARG(total_guard_bw), U64_PRINTF_ARG(total_nonguard_bw),
guard_weight, (int)(rule == WEIGHT_FOR_GUARD));
+#endif
- /* Almost done: choose a random value from the bandwidth weights. */
- rand_bw = crypto_rand_uint64(total_bw);
- rand_bw++; /* crypto_rand_uint64() counts from 0, and we need to count
- * from 1 below. See bug 1203 for details. */
-
- /* Last, count through sl until we get to the element we picked */
- tmp = 0;
- i_chosen = (unsigned)smartlist_len(sl);
- i_has_been_chosen = 0;
- for (i=0; i < (unsigned)smartlist_len(sl); i++) {
- is_exit = bitarray_is_set(exit_bits, i);
- is_guard = bitarray_is_set(guard_bits, i);
-
- /* Weights can be 0 if not counting guards/exits */
- if (is_exit && is_guard)
- tmp += ((uint64_t)(bandwidths[i] * exit_weight * guard_weight));
- else if (is_guard)
- tmp += ((uint64_t)(bandwidths[i] * guard_weight));
- else if (is_exit)
- tmp += ((uint64_t)(bandwidths[i] * exit_weight));
- else
- tmp += bandwidths[i];
+ scale_array_elements_to_u64(bandwidths, smartlist_len(sl),
+ &sl_last_total_weighted_bw);
- if (tmp >= rand_bw && !i_has_been_chosen) {
- i_chosen = i;
- i_has_been_chosen = 1;
- }
+ {
+ int idx = choose_array_element_by_weight(bandwidths,
+ smartlist_len(sl));
+ tor_free(bandwidths);
+ tor_free(fast_bits);
+ tor_free(exit_bits);
+ tor_free(guard_bits);
+ return idx < 0 ? NULL : smartlist_get(sl, idx);
}
- i = i_chosen;
- if (i == (unsigned)smartlist_len(sl)) {
- /* This was once possible due to round-off error, but shouldn't be able
- * to occur any longer. */
- tor_fragile_assert();
- --i;
- log_warn(LD_BUG, "Round-off error in computing bandwidth had an effect on "
- " which router we chose. Please tell the developers. "
- U64_FORMAT " " U64_FORMAT " " U64_FORMAT, U64_PRINTF_ARG(tmp),
- U64_PRINTF_ARG(rand_bw), U64_PRINTF_ARG(total_bw));
- }
- tor_free(bandwidths);
- tor_free(exit_bits);
- tor_free(guard_bits);
- return smartlist_get(sl, i);
}
/** Choose a random element of status list <b>sl</b>, weighted by
diff --git a/src/or/routerlist.h b/src/or/routerlist.h
index e84b0405d..ab58b9ee5 100644
--- a/src/or/routerlist.h
+++ b/src/or/routerlist.h
@@ -216,5 +216,19 @@ int hex_digest_nickname_decode(const char *hexdigest,
char *nickname_qualifier_out,
char *nickname_out);
+#ifdef ROUTERLIST_PRIVATE
+/** Helper type for choosing routers by bandwidth: contains a union of
+ * double and uint64_t. Before we call scale_array_elements_to_u64, it holds
+ * a double; after, it holds a uint64_t. */
+typedef union u64_dbl_t {
+ uint64_t u64;
+ double dbl;
+} u64_dbl_t;
+
+int choose_array_element_by_weight(const u64_dbl_t *entries, int n_entries);
+void scale_array_elements_to_u64(u64_dbl_t *entries, int n_entries,
+ uint64_t *total_out);
+#endif
+
#endif
diff --git a/src/test/test.h b/src/test/test.h
index 0b6e6c60c..6dcb9490b 100644
--- a/src/test/test.h
+++ b/src/test/test.h
@@ -65,6 +65,10 @@
#define test_memeq_hex(expr1, hex) test_mem_op_hex(expr1, ==, hex)
+#define tt_double_op(a,op,b) \
+ tt_assert_test_type(a,b,#a" "#op" "#b,double,(val1_ op val2_),"%f", \
+ TT_EXIT_TEST_FUNCTION)
+
const char *get_fname(const char *name);
crypto_pk_t *pk_generate(int idx);
diff --git a/src/test/test_dir.c b/src/test/test_dir.c
index af878a696..9bf44b116 100644
--- a/src/test/test_dir.c
+++ b/src/test/test_dir.c
@@ -4,9 +4,12 @@
/* See LICENSE for licensing information */
#include "orconfig.h"
+#include <math.h>
+
#define DIRSERV_PRIVATE
#define DIRVOTE_PRIVATE
#define ROUTER_PRIVATE
+#define ROUTERLIST_PRIVATE
#define HIBERNATE_PRIVATE
#include "or.h"
#include "directory.h"
@@ -1389,6 +1392,124 @@ test_dir_v3_networkstatus(void)
ns_detached_signatures_free(dsig2);
}
+static void
+test_dir_scale_bw(void *testdata)
+{
+ double v[8] = { 2.0/3,
+ 7.0,
+ 1.0,
+ 3.0,
+ 1.0/5,
+ 1.0/7,
+ 12.0,
+ 24.0 };
+ u64_dbl_t vals[8];
+ uint64_t total;
+ int i;
+
+ (void) testdata;
+
+ for (i=0; i<8; ++i)
+ vals[i].dbl = v[i];
+
+ scale_array_elements_to_u64(vals, 8, &total);
+
+ tt_int_op((int)total, ==, 48);
+ total = 0;
+ for (i=0; i<8; ++i) {
+ total += vals[i].u64;
+ }
+ tt_assert(total >= (U64_LITERAL(1)<<60));
+ tt_assert(total <= (U64_LITERAL(1)<<62));
+
+ for (i=0; i<8; ++i) {
+ double ratio = ((double)vals[i].u64) / vals[2].u64;
+ tt_double_op(fabs(ratio - v[i]), <, .00001);
+ }
+
+ done:
+ ;
+}
+
+static void
+test_dir_random_weighted(void *testdata)
+{
+ int histogram[10];
+ uint64_t vals[10] = {3,1,2,4,6,0,7,5,8,9}, total=0;
+ u64_dbl_t inp[10];
+ int i, choice;
+ const int n = 50000;
+ double max_sq_error;
+ (void) testdata;
+
+ /* Try a ten-element array with values from 0 through 10. The values are
+ * in a scrambled order to make sure we don't depend on order. */
+ memset(histogram,0,sizeof(histogram));
+ for (i=0; i<10; ++i) {
+ inp[i].u64 = vals[i];
+ total += vals[i];
+ }
+ tt_int_op(total, ==, 45);
+ for (i=0; i<n; ++i) {
+ choice = choose_array_element_by_weight(inp, 10);
+ tt_int_op(choice, >=, 0);
+ tt_int_op(choice, <, 10);
+ histogram[choice]++;
+ }
+
+ /* Now see if we chose things about frequently enough. */
+ max_sq_error = 0;
+ for (i=0; i<10; ++i) {
+ int expected = (int)(n*vals[i]/total);
+ double frac_diff = 0, sq;
+ TT_BLATHER((" %d : %5d vs %5d\n", (int)vals[i], histogram[i], expected));
+ if (expected)
+ frac_diff = (histogram[i] - expected) / ((double)expected);
+ else
+ tt_int_op(histogram[i], ==, 0);
+
+ sq = frac_diff * frac_diff;
+ if (sq > max_sq_error)
+ max_sq_error = sq;
+ }
+ /* It should almost always be much much less than this. If you want to
+ * figure out the odds, please feel free. */
+ tt_double_op(max_sq_error, <, .05);
+
+ /* Now try a singleton; do we choose it? */
+ for (i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {
+ choice = choose_array_element_by_weight(inp, 1);
+ tt_int_op(choice, ==, 0);
+ }
+
+ /* Now try an array of zeros. We should choose randomly. */
+ memset(histogram,0,sizeof(histogram));
+ for (i = 0; i < 5; ++i)
+ inp[i].u64 = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
+ choice = choose_array_element_by_weight(inp, 5);
+ tt_int_op(choice, >=, 0);
+ tt_int_op(choice, <, 5);
+ histogram[choice]++;
+ }
+ /* Now see if we chose things about frequently enough. */
+ max_sq_error = 0;
+ for (i=0; i<5; ++i) {
+ int expected = n/5;
+ double frac_diff = 0, sq;
+ TT_BLATHER((" %d : %5d vs %5d\n", (int)vals[i], histogram[i], expected));
+ frac_diff = (histogram[i] - expected) / ((double)expected);
+ sq = frac_diff * frac_diff;
+ if (sq > max_sq_error)
+ max_sq_error = sq;
+ }
+ /* It should almost always be much much less than this. If you want to
+ * figure out the odds, please feel free. */
+ tt_double_op(max_sq_error, <, .05);
+ done:
+ ;
+}
+
#define DIR_LEGACY(name) \
{ #name, legacy_test_helper, TT_FORK, &legacy_setup, test_dir_ ## name }
@@ -1404,6 +1525,8 @@ struct testcase_t dir_tests[] = {
DIR_LEGACY(measured_bw),
DIR_LEGACY(param_voting),
DIR_LEGACY(v3_networkstatus),
+ DIR(random_weighted),
+ DIR(scale_bw),
END_OF_TESTCASES
};