aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoger Dingledine <arma@torproject.org>2009-07-27 21:01:24 -0400
committerRoger Dingledine <arma@torproject.org>2009-07-27 21:58:32 -0400
commit2b63fa40e8349e0e6c40d0660d9df5b0ba73937e (patch)
tree533c7b62fa1081b970c9ab9965f133cb222c4405
parentf39cee375472a6e3a4f0decb7e2f91c5768a2165 (diff)
downloadtor-2b63fa40e8349e0e6c40d0660d9df5b0ba73937e.tar
tor-2b63fa40e8349e0e6c40d0660d9df5b0ba73937e.tar.gz
three hacks to workaround bug 1038
The problem is that clients and hidden services are receiving relay_early cells, and they tear down the circuit. Hack #1 is for rendezvous points to rewrite relay_early cells to relay cells. That way there are never any incoming relay_early cells. Hack #2 is for clients and hidden services to never send a relay_early cell on an established rendezvous circuit. That works around rendezvous points that haven't upgraded yet. Hack #3 is for clients and hidden services to not tear down the circuit when they receive an inbound relay_early cell. We already refuse extend cells at clients.
-rw-r--r--ChangeLog6
-rw-r--r--src/or/command.c8
-rw-r--r--src/or/or.h5
-rw-r--r--src/or/relay.c17
4 files changed, 25 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 66664c18d..59404929c 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+Changes in version 0.2.1.19 - 2009-07-??
+ o Major bugfixes:
+ - Make accessing hidden services on 0.2.1.x work right
+ again. Bugfix on 0.2.1.3-alpha; workaround for bug 1038.
+
+
Changes in version 0.2.1.18 - 2009-07-24
o Build fixes:
- Add LIBS=-lrt to Makefile.am so the Tor RPMs use a static libevent.
diff --git a/src/or/command.c b/src/or/command.c
index 9481e5bcc..c36874be5 100644
--- a/src/or/command.c
+++ b/src/or/command.c
@@ -395,12 +395,8 @@ command_process_relay_cell(cell_t *cell, or_connection_t *conn)
* gotten no more than MAX_RELAY_EARLY_CELLS_PER_CIRCUIT of them. */
if (cell->command == CELL_RELAY_EARLY) {
if (direction == CELL_DIRECTION_IN) {
- log_fn(LOG_PROTOCOL_WARN, LD_OR,
- "Received an inbound RELAY_EARLY cell on circuit %d from %s:%d."
- " Closing circuit.",
- cell->circ_id, conn->_base.address, conn->_base.port);
- circuit_mark_for_close(circ, END_CIRC_REASON_TORPROTOCOL);
- return;
+ /* XXX Allow an unlimited number of inbound relay_early cells for
+ * now, for hidden service compatibility. See bug 1038. -RD */
} else {
or_circuit_t *or_circ = TO_OR_CIRCUIT(circ);
if (or_circ->remaining_relay_early_cells == 0) {
diff --git a/src/or/or.h b/src/or/or.h
index eddeda153..fba7af0da 100644
--- a/src/or/or.h
+++ b/src/or/or.h
@@ -488,6 +488,11 @@ typedef enum {
(p)<=_CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_MAX)
/** True iff the circuit_t <b>c</b> is actually an origin_circuit_t. */
#define CIRCUIT_IS_ORIGIN(c) (CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_IS_ORIGIN((c)->purpose))
+/** True iff the circuit purpose <b>p</b> is for an established rendezvous
+ * circuit. */
+#define CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_IS_ESTABLISHED_REND(p) \
+ ((p) == CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_REND_JOINED || \
+ (p) == CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_S_REND_JOINED)
/** How many circuits do we want simultaneously in-progress to handle
* a given stream? */
diff --git a/src/or/relay.c b/src/or/relay.c
index 8099f4f07..3419e3d19 100644
--- a/src/or/relay.c
+++ b/src/or/relay.c
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ circuit_receive_relay_cell(cell_t *cell, circuit_t *circ,
tor_assert(circ->purpose == CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_REND_ESTABLISHED);
tor_assert(splice->_base.purpose == CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_REND_ESTABLISHED);
cell->circ_id = splice->p_circ_id;
+ cell->command = CELL_RELAY; /* can't be relay_early anyway */
if ((reason = circuit_receive_relay_cell(cell, TO_CIRCUIT(splice),
CELL_DIRECTION_IN)) < 0) {
log_warn(LD_REND, "Error relaying cell across rendezvous; closing "
@@ -541,11 +542,17 @@ relay_send_command_from_edge(uint16_t stream_id, circuit_t *circ,
origin_circuit_t *origin_circ = TO_ORIGIN_CIRCUIT(circ);
if (origin_circ->remaining_relay_early_cells > 0 &&
(relay_command == RELAY_COMMAND_EXTEND ||
- cpath_layer != origin_circ->cpath)) {
- /* If we've got any relay_early cells left, and we're sending a relay
- * cell or we're not talking to the first hop, use one of them. Don't
- * worry about the conn protocol version: append_cell_to_circuit_queue
- * will fix it up. */
+ (cpath_layer != origin_circ->cpath &&
+ !CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_IS_ESTABLISHED_REND(circ->purpose)))) {
+ /* If we've got any relay_early cells left, and we're sending
+ * an extend cell or (we're not talking to the first hop and we're
+ * not talking to a rendezvous circuit), use one of them.
+ * Don't worry about the conn protocol version:
+ * append_cell_to_circuit_queue will fix it up. */
+ /* XXX For now, clients don't use RELAY_EARLY cells when sending
+ * relay cells on rendezvous circuits. See bug 1038. Eventually,
+ * we can take this behavior away in favor of having clients avoid
+ * rendezvous points running 0.2.1.3-alpha through 0.2.1.18. -RD */
cell.command = CELL_RELAY_EARLY;
--origin_circ->remaining_relay_early_cells;
log_debug(LD_OR, "Sending a RELAY_EARLY cell; %d remaining.",