1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
|
I've tried to retrieve the wmd-editor source tarball lately, but the site seems offline.
From what I've read on the Internet, wmd-editor is not (yet?) free software by itself, and its author has gone MIA.
But it looks like somebody recently took the step to rewrite a wmd-clone under a saner license, see [[pagedown|http://code.google.com/p/pagedown/source/browse/]].
Given all the above, what about upgrading this plugin to use pagedown instead of wmd? It seem a clear win to me...
> AFAICS, pagedown is a modified version of WMD. Let's
> look at its license file: --[[Joey]]
>
> A javascript port of Markdown, as used on Stack Overflow
> and the rest of Stack Exchange network.
>
> Largely based on showdown.js by John Fraser (Attacklab).
>
> Original Markdown Copyright (c) 2004-2005 John Gruber
> <http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/>
>
>
> Original Showdown code copyright (c) 2007 John Fraser
>
> Modifications and bugfixes (c) 2009 Dana Robinson
> Modifications and bugfixes (c) 2009-2011 Stack Exchange Inc.
>
> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
> copy [...]
>
> Ok, so it says it's based on showdown. John Fraser wrote showdown and also
> WMD, which IIRC was built on top of showdown. (Showdown converts the
> markdown to html, and WMD adds the editor UI.)
>
> I can nowhere find a actual statement of the copyright of showdown or
> WMD. <http://code.google.com/p/wmd/> has a "MIT License" notice on it,
> but this is clearly just the license chosen when signing up at google
> code for the repo that would be used for a rewrite of the code, and the only thing
> said about the previous 1.0 release of WMD is "use it freely", which is not
> specific enough to be a grant of license, and is moreover not a free
> software license, as it does not cover distribution or modification.
>
> Which was all covered in the thread here,
> when StackOverflow decided to start working on pagedown.
> <http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2008/12/reverse-engineering-the-wmd-editor/>
> This thread does not give any indication that they ever managed to get
> a license grant for WMD/showdown. It frankly, does not inspire confidence
> that the people working on this care about the license.
>
> It would probably be pretty easy to adapt the ikiwiki wmd plugin
> to use pagedown. But without a clear and credible license, why?
>
> (Note that I have a wmd-new branch in my ikiwiki git repo that
> uses <https://github.com/derobins/wmd>, which was an earlier
> version of pagedown (probably, not entirely clear).)
>
> An alternate alternative is markitup: <http://markitup.jaysalvat.com/>
> It has a clear history and a credible license (MIT or GPL dual license).
> It's also easily extensible to other formats so could handle rst etc.
> It does not, however, have a markdown to html converter -- for
> previewing it has to talk to the server with AJAX.
> --[[Joey]]
>> Showdown has a pretty explicit [license.txt file](https://github.com/coreyti/showdown/blob/master/license.txt)
>> and it basically looks like a BSD license. That license.txt file was imported into
>> github directly from the upstream showdown source, so it seems credible. That zip file
>> is still available [on archive.org](http://wayback.archive.org/web/20100612163302/http://attacklab.net/showdown/showdown-v0.9.zip),
>> and does mention a BSD copyright.
>>
>> So Showdown itself is clean: it's free. Nowhere does it say it derives from WMD, or
>> if it does, it doesn't matter *because* it was made by the same author **and then**
>> released under that free license. But even then, it does *not* mention being a
>> derivative of WMD.
>>
>> I agree the license behind WMD is murky. One the one hand, the [google code page](https://code.google.com/p/wmd/)
>> mentions the code will be relicensed under MIT but "for now" we can "use it freely":
>>
>> > *I'm refactoring the code, and will be releasing WMD under the MIT license soon. For
>> now you can download the most recent release (wmd-1.0.1.zip) and use it freely.*
>>
>> That zip file is again offline, but it's also [on archive.org](http://web.archive.org/web/20101226145228/http://wmd-editor.com/downloads/wmd-1.0.1.zip).
>> Things get a little more murky there: the file doesn't actually mention any copyright
>> statement, and the code is actually obfuscated, something that is mentionned on the aforementionned
>> Stack Exchange thread. The [terms and conditions of WMD](http://web.archive.org/web/20100323043113/http://wmd-editor.com/terms)
>> are pretty hostile however:
>>
>>> *All rights reserved. You may not duplicate, copy, or reuse any portion of the HTML/CSS, JavaScript, or visual design elements or concepts without express written permission from AttackLab.*
>>
>> But one could argue they apply only to WMD, and *not* showdown, which has been
>> explicitely published under a different license. And maybe that was the whole
>> point here: the stack exchange people were trying to negociate having the
>> clear and free version of WMD for their own use, maybe showdown is actually
>> what came out of this and what allows Stack exchange to do their thing...
>>
>> And besides: the point here is that we *can't actually use WMD safely*, but
>> we **can use pagedown safely!**.
>>
>> So let's work on merging that pretty branch already shall we? :) --[[anarcat]]
|