diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/plugins/contrib/album/discussion.mdwn | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/album/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/album/discussion.mdwn index 156cd7ad8..50d6c8ddd 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/contrib/album/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/album/discussion.mdwn @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ code or tried it yet, but here goes. --[[Joey]] * Needing to create the albumimage "viewer" pages for each photo seems like it will become a pain. Everyone will need to come up with their own automation for it, and then there's the question - of how to automate it when uploading attachments. + of how to automate it when uploading attachments. -J > There's already a script (ikiwiki-album) to populate a git > checkout with skeleton "viewer" pages; I was planning to make a @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ code or tried it yet, but here goes. --[[Joey]] * With each viewer page having next/prev links, I can see how you were having the scalability issues with ikiwiki's data structures - earlier! + earlier! -J > Yeah, I think they're a basic requirement from a UI point of view > though (although they don't necessarily have to be full wikilinks). @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ code or tried it yet, but here goes. --[[Joey]] * And doesn't each viewer page really depend on every other page in the same albumsection? If a new page is added, the next/prev links may need to be updated, for example. If so, there will be much - unnecessary rebuilding. + unnecessary rebuilding. -J > albumsections are just a way to insert headings into the flow of > photos, so they don't actually affect dependencies. @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ code or tried it yet, but here goes. --[[Joey]] >>> have no idea what it depends on until the rebuild phase. -s * One thing I do like about having individual pages per image is - that they can each have their own comments, etc. + that they can each have their own comments, etc. -J > Yes; also, they can be wikilinked. I consider those to be > UI requirements. -s @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ code or tried it yet, but here goes. --[[Joey]] album, but then anyone who can write to any other page on the wiki can add an image to it. 2: I may want an image to appear in more than one album. Think tags. So it seems it would be better to have the album - directive control what pages it includes (a la inline). + directive control what pages it includes (a la inline). -J > I'm inclined to fix this by constraining images to be subpages of exactly > one album: if they're subpages of 2+ nested albums then they're only @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ code or tried it yet, but here goes. --[[Joey]] etc. (Real pity we can't just put arbitrary metadata into the images themselves.) This is almost pointing toward making the images first-class wiki page sources. Hey, it worked for po! :) But the metadata and editing - problems probably don't really allow that. + problems probably don't really allow that. -J > Putting a JPEG in the web form is not an option from my point of > view :-) but perhaps there could just be a "web-editable" flag supplied |