diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn b/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn index 736d674fe..841fc3703 100644 --- a/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn @@ -24,16 +24,16 @@ Implementation plan: and refresh site. Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above. -[[!template id=gitbranch branch=peteg/revert author="[[peteg]]"]] +[[!template id=gitbranch branch=peteg/revert author="[[users/peteg]]"]] ->> It is on a separate branch now. --[[peteg]] +>> It is on a separate branch now. --[[users/peteg]] > Review: --[[Joey]] > > The revert commit will not currently say what web user did the revert. > This could be fixed by doing a --no-commit revert first and then using > rcs_commit_staged. ->> Fixed, I think. --[[peteg]] +>> Fixed, I think. --[[users/peteg]] > > So I see one thing I completly forgot about is `check_canedit`. Avoiding users > using reverting to make changes they would normally not be allowed to do is @@ -45,12 +45,12 @@ Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above. > structure that `rcs_recieve` does. This could be done by using `git revert > --no-commit`, and then examining the changes, and then `git reset` to drop > them. ->> We can use the existing `git_commit_info` with the patch ID - no need to touch the working directory. -- [[peteg]] +>> We can use the existing `git_commit_info` with the patch ID - no need to touch the working directory. -- [[users/peteg]] > > Then the code that is currently in IkiWiki/Receive.pm, that calls > `check_canedit` and `check_canremove` to test the change, can be > straightforwardly refactored out, and used for checking reverts too. ->> Wow, that was easy. :-) -- [[peteg]] +>> Wow, that was easy. :-) -- [[users/peteg]] > > (The data from `rcs_preprevert` could also be used for a confirmation > prompt -- it doesn't currently include enough info for diffs, but at @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above. >>> I agree, but have not figured out a way to make a hook work yet. >>> --[[Joey]] >> ->> Please look it over and tell me what else needs fixing... -- [[peteg]] +>> Please look it over and tell me what else needs fixing... -- [[users/peteg]] >>> I have made my own revert branch and put a few^Wseveral fixes in there. >>> All merged to master now! --[[Joey]] |