aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/bugs/definition_lists_should_be_bold.mdwn
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/bugs/definition_lists_should_be_bold.mdwn')
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/definition_lists_should_be_bold.mdwn27
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/definition_lists_should_be_bold.mdwn b/doc/bugs/definition_lists_should_be_bold.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a72206b8c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/definition_lists_should_be_bold.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+Definition lists do not look great here...
+
+Here is an example.
+
+<dl>
+<dt>this is a term</dt>
+<dd>and this is its definition.</dd>
+</dl>
+
+(This wiki doesn't support Markdown's extended definition lists, but still, this is valid markup.)
+
+I believe `<dt>` should be made bold. I have added this to my `local.css`, and I would hate to add this all the time forever:
+
+ /* definition lists look better with the term in bold */
+ dt
+ {
+ font-weight: bold;
+ }
+
+:) How does that look? I can provide a patch for the base wiki if you guys really want... ;) -- [[anarcat]]
+
+> What you dislike seems to be the default rendering of definition lists by
+> browsers. I don't think it's ikiwiki's place to override browser defaults
+> for standard markup in the document body, at least not in the default
+> antitheme. --[[Joey]]
+
+> > How about in the actiontab theme then? :)