diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/__91____91____33__inline_postform__61__no__93____93___doesn__39__t_disable_it.mdwn | 9 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/__91____91____33__inline_postform__61__no__93____93___doesn__39__t_disable_it.mdwn b/doc/bugs/__91____91____33__inline_postform__61__no__93____93___doesn__39__t_disable_it.mdwn index 70deda2ab..4469db4b5 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/__91____91____33__inline_postform__61__no__93____93___doesn__39__t_disable_it.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/__91____91____33__inline_postform__61__no__93____93___doesn__39__t_disable_it.mdwn @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +[[!tag patch user/smcv/ready]] +[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/ready/postform-no +author="[[Simon McVittie|smcv]]" +browse=http://git.pseudorandom.co.uk/smcv/ikiwiki.git/shortlog/refs/heads/ready/postform-no]] + The [[ikiwiki/directive/inline]] directive generates a form if it has either rootpage, or postform with a "yes-like" value. This means that @@ -9,4 +14,8 @@ mentioning rootpage there is useless). See also [[forum/How_to_disable_"Add_a_new_post_titled:"_submission_form?]]. +My `ready/postform-no` branch also contains a trivial regression test for +`inline`. So far the only thing it really tests is that this bug was fixed, +not the actual inlining of pages, but it's a start. + --[[smcv]] |