Added a comment: branches

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/doc/forum/multi_domain_setup_possible__63__/comment_2_75d6581f81b71fb8acbe3561047ea759._comment b/doc/forum/multi_domain_setup_possible__63__/comment_2_75d6581f81b71fb8acbe3561047ea759._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..473f52f5c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/multi_domain_setup_possible__63__/comment_2_75d6581f81b71fb8acbe3561047ea759._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://claimid.com/helios"
+ nickname="helios"
+ subject="branches"
+ date="2010-08-15T16:18:35Z"
+ content="""
+So I I just put a blog entry, which is just a file on both branches. Seems I have to learn cherry-picking and merging only some changes.
+
+Still I am duplicating files then and when I edit one file I have to think to also edit the other one or merge the change to it. I thought of a way to tag a blog entry on which site it should appear. And then I just have to edit one file and contents changes on all sites that share it.
+
+But then I possibly can do some master blog / shared content branch, so that shared content is only stored once. Then I need to find a way to automatically replicate the changes there to all sites it belongs too. But how do I store it.
+
+I also thought about just using symlinks for files. Can I have two sites in one repository and symlink shared files stuff around? I know bzr can version control symlinks.
+
+Hmmm, I think I better read more about branching, cherry-picking and merging before I proceed. I used bzr and git, but from the user interface side of things prefer bzr, which should be fast enough for this use case.
+"""]]