diff options
| author | https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat <https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat@web> | 2016-08-29 23:50:26 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | admin <admin@branchable.com> | 2016-08-29 23:50:26 -0400 |
| commit | 9d4a0aa31bb4617156b0743f3bbbc909dcc7781c (patch) | |
| tree | 7ce1dc63d4f19a9f82965d75569a47bcb1e73a30 /doc/todo | |
| parent | 4f8d45bfde9c031f63d191909bb3dfe684b814e1 (diff) | |
| download | ikiwiki-9d4a0aa31bb4617156b0743f3bbbc909dcc7781c.tar ikiwiki-9d4a0aa31bb4617156b0743f3bbbc909dcc7781c.tar.gz | |
clarify and more links
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/todo')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/Track_Markdown_Standardisation_Efforts.mdwn | 21 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/Track_Markdown_Standardisation_Efforts.mdwn b/doc/todo/Track_Markdown_Standardisation_Efforts.mdwn index 545098eda..3992be1e6 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Track_Markdown_Standardisation_Efforts.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Track_Markdown_Standardisation_Efforts.mdwn @@ -17,18 +17,21 @@ It might be worth following... > or recommends a different (and hopefully better) third-party library. > --[[smcv]] -> I am not sure the noise is so much "recent" anymore: that article +> I am not sure the noise is so much "recent" anymore: that article > announcing Commonmark is from 2012 and markdown.github.com is from -> around 2014. -> -> Presumably, Commonmark will become official in 2016, but you know what -> they say about standards: <https://xkcd.com/927/> +> around 2014. Presumably, Commonmark will become official in 2016, +> but you know what they say about [standards][]... > -> I guess the only thing that Ikiwiki would need to do would be to -> somewhat support Commonmark. There's a Perl library that wraps the C -> library here: https://metacpan.org/release/CommonMark +> I guess the only thing that Ikiwiki would need to do would be to +> somewhat support Commonmark. There's a [Perl library][] that wraps +> the C library, but nothing native yet. > > I guess we would need to test how it performs and compares with > Discount, but having it as a third party module is up for anyone's > grab. It should be a fairly simple implementation after all... -> --[[anarcat]] +> Then it should probably be mentionned in [this discussion][] for +> everyone's benefit as well. --[[anarcat]] +> +> [standards]: https://xkcd.com/927/ +> [Perl library]: https://metacpan.org/release/CommonMark +> [this discussion]: https://talk.commonmark.org/t/i-wonder-if-there-is-a-wiki-engine-that-uses-markdown/1281/18 |