diff options
| author | Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> | 2007-11-28 15:27:36 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> | 2007-11-28 15:27:36 -0500 |
| commit | 98f70ae9ab64e6684c7bd1f0def0c5d7dffcc66a (patch) | |
| tree | 942eef5e9a4b3aa31775af102e3cd7be8f6b2c61 | |
| parent | 80972e5e2669ec6e3258be0d12dc5859478d4c7e (diff) | |
| download | ikiwiki-98f70ae9ab64e6684c7bd1f0def0c5d7dffcc66a.tar ikiwiki-98f70ae9ab64e6684c7bd1f0def0c5d7dffcc66a.tar.gz | |
response
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn | 4 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn b/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn index 132fecaa5..2439cd65f 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn @@ -17,4 +17,6 @@ In our team internal wiki, we wish to impose a policy that all edits must have a > a plugin, without providing a whole new template for editform, which obviously > isn't a workable solution. If the template was modified to allow overriding the > portion of the message in question, then I agree that a plugin couuld do the rest. -> Thoughts appreciated :) --[[Dom]]
\ No newline at end of file +> Thoughts appreciated :) --[[Dom]] + +> Yes, modifying the template is ok. --[[Joey]] |