diff options
author | joey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071> | 2006-12-28 20:44:48 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | joey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071> | 2006-12-28 20:44:48 +0000 |
commit | c9e07b583bb730a7697cbbeb8b1b7d912d8a1780 (patch) | |
tree | e4c6470623d34dce75b77c9c42391bf421b11ffd | |
parent | 85566ff3a33298f16bd1102e6e011b85a8e8ea3d (diff) | |
download | ikiwiki-c9e07b583bb730a7697cbbeb8b1b7d912d8a1780.tar ikiwiki-c9e07b583bb730a7697cbbeb8b1b7d912d8a1780.tar.gz |
responses
-rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/disable_sub-discussion_pages.mdwn | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/hardcoded___34__Discussion__34___link.mdwn | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | doc/index/discussion.mdwn | 14 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | doc/patchqueue/more_class__61____34____34___for_css.mdwn | 41 |
4 files changed, 43 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/disable_sub-discussion_pages.mdwn b/doc/bugs/disable_sub-discussion_pages.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e004e53e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/disable_sub-discussion_pages.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +Any setting to disable having a discussion of a discussion? +The [[features]] page says every page, but I don't want every page. +I do want discussion subpage, but I don't want to have, for example: discussion/ discussion/ discussion. +-- [[JeremyReed]] + +> Discussion pages should clearly be a special case that don't get Discussion +> links put at the top. --[[Joey]] diff --git a/doc/bugs/hardcoded___34__Discussion__34___link.mdwn b/doc/bugs/hardcoded___34__Discussion__34___link.mdwn index 7c7ac1537..fc8406d87 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/hardcoded___34__Discussion__34___link.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/hardcoded___34__Discussion__34___link.mdwn @@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ or "History". > link needs to be different if the Discussion page doesn't yet exist. >> You can always use <tmpl_if> and <tmpl_else> construct in that place ;) --Pawel + +>>> Not without duplicating the logic that constructs a link to an +>>> existing/nonexisting page in two places, one in code in ikiwiki and one +>>> in the template. Not good design. --[[Joey]] > As noted in [[patchqueue/l10n]], there are some other places in ikiwiki > that hard code English strings, and I feel that using standard gettext @@ -32,4 +36,7 @@ or "History". >> >> BTW, is there a chance for configurable name of Discussion page? >> In my wiki I use only Polish name of pages, so I would like to have ->> dyskusja.html page, instead of discussion.html page. --Pawel
\ No newline at end of file +>> dyskusja.html page, instead of discussion.html page. --Pawel + +>>> I have an incomplete i10n patch for such hardcoded strings in the code, +>>> which I hope to finish up eventually --[[Joey]] diff --git a/doc/index/discussion.mdwn b/doc/index/discussion.mdwn index 4b3f3b4eb..15a85725a 100644 --- a/doc/index/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/index/discussion.mdwn @@ -232,21 +232,21 @@ editing a page. Is that an option that can be enabled? Any setting for limiting how many kilobytes can be submitted via the "edit" form? -- [[JeremyReed]] -> Not currently. Worried about abuse? -man -[[Joey]] +> Not currently. Worried about abuse? --[[Joey]] >> I didn't want it abused accidently or with malice. I was thinking that Perl's CGI.pm would handle this, but I don't see that. >> I read that textarea max bytes may be 500 lines or 28000 characters or 30000 characters or 64kB. It seems like it >> varies and I didn't test myself, because I guess it may depend on different clients and different HTTP servers. >> This could be checked using javascript on the client side (before submitting) and by checking size on server side (before saving). --[[JeremyReed]] +>>> The absolute limit varies by browser. If there are web servers that +>>> also limit it, I don't know of them. --[[Joey]] + ---- # Disable sub-discussion pages? -Any setting to disable having a discussion of a discussion? -The [[features]] page says every page, but I don't want every page. -I do want discussion subpage, but I don't want to have, for example: discussion/ discussion/ discussion. --- [[JeremyReed]] +> Moved to [[bugs]] -- [[Joey]] ---- @@ -261,6 +261,10 @@ What is the correct way to include ,v RCS revision files in my source tree witho -- [[JeremyReed]] +> Add the ,v to the $config{wiki_file_prune_regexps} array. This is how we +> skip equivilant files from other revision control systems too. +> --[[Joey]]] + ---- # Textile Plugin diff --git a/doc/patchqueue/more_class__61____34____34___for_css.mdwn b/doc/patchqueue/more_class__61____34____34___for_css.mdwn index 4b77a3ebf..c91728633 100644 --- a/doc/patchqueue/more_class__61____34____34___for_css.mdwn +++ b/doc/patchqueue/more_class__61____34____34___for_css.mdwn @@ -2,32 +2,25 @@ I'm writing my own CSS for ikiwiki. During this effort I often found the need of In this patch I plan to collect changes in this direction. -The first, one-liner, patch is to use a "div" element with a class="actions" attribute for inline page as is done with non-inlined page. This way the same CSS formatting can be applied to div.actions in the CSS, while at the moment it must be duplicated for a span.actions (which I believe is also incorrect, since it will contain a "ul" element, not sure though). In case the markup should be differentiated it will still be possible relying on the fact that a div.actions is contained or not in a div.inlinepage. +The first, one-liner, patch is to use a "div" element with a +class="actions" attribute for inline page as is done with non-inlined page. +This way the same CSS formatting can be applied to div.actions in the CSS, +while at the moment it must be duplicated for a span.actions (which I +believe is also incorrect, since it will contain a "ul" element, not sure +though). In case the markup should be differentiated it will still be +possible relying on the fact that a div.actions is contained or not in a +div.inlinepage. Here's the one-liner: - --- /usr/share/ikiwiki/templates/inlinepage.tmpl 2006-12-28 16:24:06.000000000 +0100 - +++ inlinepage.tmpl.new 2006-12-28 16:24:04.000000000 +0100 - @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ - </span> +> applied --[[Joey]] - <TMPL_IF NAME="HAVE_ACTIONS"> - -<span class="actions"> - +<div class="actions"> - <ul> - <TMPL_IF NAME="EDITURL"> - <li><a href="<TMPL_VAR EDITURL>">Edit</a></li> - @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ - <li><TMPL_VAR DISCUSSIONLINK></li> - </TMPL_IF> - </ul> - -</span> - +</div> - </TMPL_IF> +The following adds a div element with class="trailer" around the +meta-information added after an inlined page (namely: the post date, the +tags, and the actions): - </div> - -The following adds a div element with class="trailer" around the meta-information added after an inlined page (namely: the post date, the tags, and the actions): +The following adds a div element with class="trailer" around the meta-informati +on added after an inlined page (namely: the post date, the tags, and the actions): --- inlinepage.tmpl.orig 2006-12-28 16:56:49.000000000 +0100 +++ inlinepage.tmpl 2006-12-28 17:02:06.000000000 +0100 @@ -47,4 +40,8 @@ The following adds a div element with class="trailer" around the meta-informatio + +</div> - +> Unfortunately, the inlinepage content passes through markdown, and markdown +> gets confused by these nested div's and puts p's around one of them, generating +> broken html. If you can come up with a way to put in the div that passes +> the test suite, or a fix to markdown, I will accept it, but the above patch +> fails the test suite. --[[Joey]] |