blob: 1845fcb9b8ecdb1ad2b877171a12764801f2a74d (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
|
This test has proven to be unreliable, often leading to things like this
in gapplication.log:
PASS: gapplication 3 /gapplication/properties
Failed to register: The connection is closed
**
GLib-GIO:ERROR:gapplication.c:564:test_quit: assertion failed: (activated)
ok 4 /gapplication/app-id
PASS: gapplication 4 /gapplication/app-id
../../tap-test: line 5: 24133 Aborted $1 -k --tap
# GLib-GIO:ERROR:gapplication.c:564:test_quit: assertion failed: (activated)
cleaning up pid 24154
ERROR: gapplication - missing test plan
ERROR: gapplication - exited with status 134 (terminated by signal 6?)
See <https://bugs.debian.org/756273> and <http://bugs.gnu.org/18445>.
--- glib-2.40.2/gio/tests/gapplication.c 2014-12-03 22:34:44.566667649 +0100
+++ glib-2.40.2/gio/tests/gapplication.c 2014-12-03 22:34:45.346674179 +0100
@@ -685,7 +685,6 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
/* g_test_add_func ("/gapplication/non-unique", test_nonunique); */
g_test_add_func ("/gapplication/properties", properties);
g_test_add_func ("/gapplication/app-id", appid);
- g_test_add_func ("/gapplication/quit", test_quit);
g_test_add_func ("/gapplication/local-actions", test_local_actions);
/* g_test_add_func ("/gapplication/remote-actions", test_remote_actions); */
g_test_add_func ("/gapplication/local-command-line", test_local_command_line);
|