diff options
author | Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> | 2020-09-23 10:29:09 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> | 2020-09-27 21:41:08 +0200 |
commit | 2bf6f962b91123b0474c0f7123cd17efe7f09a66 (patch) | |
tree | 21f74da9ad3b3eaacf91cd63302bea01f55bedb9 /tests/packages.scm | |
parent | ff39361c80dfc67a9afe35f315a774140d8cf99b (diff) | |
download | guix-2bf6f962b91123b0474c0f7123cd17efe7f09a66.tar guix-2bf6f962b91123b0474c0f7123cd17efe7f09a66.tar.gz |
packages: 'package-input-rewriting/spec' can rewrite implicit dependencies.
With this change, '--with-input', '--with-graft', etc. also apply to
implicit dependencies. Thus, it's now possible to do:
guix build python-itsdangerous --with-input=python-wrapper=python@2
or:
guix build hello --with-graft=glibc=glibc@2.29
Additionally, before, implicit inputs were not rewritten, which could
lead to duplicates in the output of 'bag-transitive-inputs' (packages
that are not 'eq?' but lead to the same derivation). This in turn would
lead to unnecessary rebuilds when using '--with-input' & co. This
change fixes it by ensuring even implicit inputs are rewritten.
Fixes <https://bugs.gnu.org/42156>.
* guix/packages.scm (package-input-rewriting/spec): Add #:deep?
defaulting to #true, and pass it to 'package-mapping'.
[replacement-property]: New variable.
[rewrite]: Check that property and set it on the result of PROC.
[cut?]: New procedure.
* tests/packages.scm ("package-input-rewriting/spec"): Ensure implicit
inputs were unchanged.
("package-input-rewriting/spec, partial match"): Pass #:deep? #f.
("package-input-rewriting/spec, deep")
("package-input-rewriting/spec, no duplicates"): New tests.
(package/inherit): Move before use.
* tests/guix-build.sh: Add tests.
* tests/scripts-build.scm ("options->transformation, with-graft"):
Compare dependencies by package name or derivation file name.
* doc/guix.texi (Defining Packages): Adjust accordingly.
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/packages.scm')
-rw-r--r-- | tests/packages.scm | 66 |
1 files changed, 63 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/tests/packages.scm b/tests/packages.scm index f33332a461..6fa4ad2f1b 100644 --- a/tests/packages.scm +++ b/tests/packages.scm @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ #:use-module (guix build-system) #:use-module (guix build-system trivial) #:use-module (guix build-system gnu) + #:use-module (guix build-system python) #:use-module (guix memoization) #:use-module (guix profiles) #:use-module (guix scripts package) @@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ #:use-module (gnu packages base) #:use-module (gnu packages guile) #:use-module (gnu packages bootstrap) + #:use-module (gnu packages python) #:use-module (gnu packages version-control) #:use-module (gnu packages xml) #:use-module (srfi srfi-1) @@ -1262,7 +1264,8 @@ ("baz" ,dep))))) (rewrite (package-input-rewriting/spec `(("coreutils" . ,(const sed)) - ("grep" . ,(const findutils))))) + ("grep" . ,(const findutils))) + #:deep? #f)) (p1 (rewrite p0)) (p2 (rewrite p0))) (and (not (eq? p1 p0)) @@ -1279,7 +1282,11 @@ (match (package-native-inputs dep3) ((("x" dep)) (string=? (package-full-name dep) - (package-full-name findutils)))))))))) + (package-full-name findutils))))))) + + ;; Make sure implicit inputs were left unchanged. + (equal? (drop (bag-direct-inputs (package->bag p1)) 3) + (drop (bag-direct-inputs (package->bag p0)) 3))))) (test-assert "package-input-rewriting/spec, partial match" (let* ((dep (dummy-package "chbouib" @@ -1290,7 +1297,8 @@ ("bar" ,dep))))) (rewrite (package-input-rewriting/spec `(("chbouib@123" . ,(const sed)) ;not matched - ("grep" . ,(const findutils))))) + ("grep" . ,(const findutils))) + #:deep? #f)) (p1 (rewrite p0))) (and (not (eq? p1 p0)) (string=? "example" (package-name p1)) @@ -1304,6 +1312,58 @@ (string=? (package-full-name dep) (package-full-name findutils)))))))))) +(test-assert "package-input-rewriting/spec, deep" + (let* ((dep (dummy-package "chbouib")) + (p0 (dummy-package "example" + (build-system gnu-build-system) + (inputs `(("dep" ,dep))))) + (rewrite (package-input-rewriting/spec + `(("tar" . ,(const sed)) + ("gzip" . ,(const findutils))))) + (p1 (rewrite p0)) + (p2 (rewrite p0))) + (and (not (eq? p1 p0)) + (eq? p1 p2) ;memoization + (string=? "example" (package-name p1)) + (match (package-inputs p1) + ((("dep" dep1)) + (and (string=? (package-full-name dep1) + (package-full-name dep)) + (eq? dep1 (rewrite dep))))) ;memoization + + ;; Make sure implicit inputs were replaced. + (match (bag-direct-inputs (package->bag p1)) + ((("dep" dep1) ("tar" tar) ("gzip" gzip) _ ...) + (and (eq? dep1 (rewrite dep)) + (string=? (package-full-name tar) + (package-full-name sed)) + (string=? (package-full-name gzip) + (package-full-name findutils)))))))) + +(test-assert "package-input-rewriting/spec, no duplicates" + ;; Ensure that deep input rewriting does not forget implicit inputs. Doing + ;; so could lead to duplicates in a package's inputs: in the example below, + ;; P0's transitive inputs would contain one rewritten "python" and one + ;; original "python". These two "python" packages are thus not 'eq?' but + ;; they lower to the same derivation. See <https://bugs.gnu.org/42156>, + ;; which can be reproduced by passing #:deep? #f. + (let* ((dep0 (dummy-package "dep0" + (build-system trivial-build-system) + (propagated-inputs `(("python" ,python))))) + (p0 (dummy-package "chbouib" + (build-system python-build-system) + (arguments `(#:python ,python)) + (inputs `(("dep0" ,dep0))))) + (rewrite (package-input-rewriting/spec '() #:deep? #t)) + (p1 (rewrite p0)) + (bag1 (package->bag p1)) + (pythons (filter-map (match-lambda + (("python" python) python) + (_ #f)) + (bag-transitive-inputs bag1)))) + (match (delete-duplicates pythons eq?) + ((p) (eq? p (rewrite python)))))) + (test-equal "package-patched-vulnerabilities" '(("CVE-2015-1234") ("CVE-2016-1234" "CVE-2018-4567") |