diff options
author | Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> | 2018-06-25 16:28:00 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> | 2018-06-26 11:49:07 -0400 |
commit | 8dbfaff028d73cc847a9fff03cb17006c5461b11 (patch) | |
tree | 0c72436cb2e10e8359d0093507a5ba1007be6ef6 /gnu/packages/patches | |
parent | 671dd8d6e6088055d31315315e3bdd1c4fa90a0f (diff) | |
download | guix-8dbfaff028d73cc847a9fff03cb17006c5461b11.tar guix-8dbfaff028d73cc847a9fff03cb17006c5461b11.tar.gz |
gnu: libtiff: Fix CVE-2018-{8905,10963}.
* gnu/packages/patches/libtiff-CVE-2018-8905.patch,
gnu/packages/patches/libtiff-CVE-2018-10963.patch: New files.
* gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add them.
* gnu/packages/image.scm (libtiff)[replacement]: New field.
(libtiff/fixed): New variable.
Diffstat (limited to 'gnu/packages/patches')
-rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/patches/libtiff-CVE-2018-10963.patch | 40 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/patches/libtiff-CVE-2018-8905.patch | 61 |
2 files changed, 101 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/libtiff-CVE-2018-10963.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/libtiff-CVE-2018-10963.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d31c12399d --- /dev/null +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/libtiff-CVE-2018-10963.patch @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +Fix CVE-2018-10963: + +http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2795 +https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-10963 + +Patch copied from upstream source repository: + +https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/commit/de144fd228e4be8aa484c3caf3d814b6fa88c6d9 + +From de144fd228e4be8aa484c3caf3d814b6fa88c6d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Even Rouault <even.rouault@spatialys.com> +Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 14:24:15 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] TIFFWriteDirectorySec: avoid assertion. Fixes + http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2795. CVE-2018-10963 + +--- + libtiff/tif_dirwrite.c | 7 +++++-- + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/libtiff/tif_dirwrite.c b/libtiff/tif_dirwrite.c +index 2430de6d..c15a28db 100644 +--- a/libtiff/tif_dirwrite.c ++++ b/libtiff/tif_dirwrite.c +@@ -695,8 +695,11 @@ TIFFWriteDirectorySec(TIFF* tif, int isimage, int imagedone, uint64* pdiroff) + } + break; + default: +- assert(0); /* we should never get here */ +- break; ++ TIFFErrorExt(tif->tif_clientdata,module, ++ "Cannot write tag %d (%s)", ++ TIFFFieldTag(o), ++ o->field_name ? o->field_name : "unknown"); ++ goto bad; + } + } + } +-- +2.17.0 + diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/libtiff-CVE-2018-8905.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/libtiff-CVE-2018-8905.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..f49815789e --- /dev/null +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/libtiff-CVE-2018-8905.patch @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +Fix CVE-2018-8095: + +http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2780 +https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-8905 + +Patch copied from upstream source repository: + +https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/commit/58a898cb4459055bb488ca815c23b880c242a27d + +From 58a898cb4459055bb488ca815c23b880c242a27d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Even Rouault <even.rouault@spatialys.com> +Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 15:32:31 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] LZWDecodeCompat(): fix potential index-out-of-bounds write. + Fixes http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2780 / CVE-2018-8905 + +The fix consists in using the similar code LZWDecode() to validate we +don't write outside of the output buffer. +--- + libtiff/tif_lzw.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ + 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/libtiff/tif_lzw.c b/libtiff/tif_lzw.c +index 4ccb443c..94d85e38 100644 +--- a/libtiff/tif_lzw.c ++++ b/libtiff/tif_lzw.c +@@ -602,6 +602,7 @@ LZWDecodeCompat(TIFF* tif, uint8* op0, tmsize_t occ0, uint16 s) + char *tp; + unsigned char *bp; + int code, nbits; ++ int len; + long nextbits, nextdata, nbitsmask; + code_t *codep, *free_entp, *maxcodep, *oldcodep; + +@@ -753,13 +754,18 @@ LZWDecodeCompat(TIFF* tif, uint8* op0, tmsize_t occ0, uint16 s) + } while (--occ); + break; + } +- assert(occ >= codep->length); +- op += codep->length; +- occ -= codep->length; +- tp = op; ++ len = codep->length; ++ tp = op + len; + do { +- *--tp = codep->value; +- } while( (codep = codep->next) != NULL ); ++ int t; ++ --tp; ++ t = codep->value; ++ codep = codep->next; ++ *tp = (char)t; ++ } while (codep && tp > op); ++ assert(occ >= len); ++ op += len; ++ occ -= len; + } else { + *op++ = (char)code; + occ--; +-- +2.17.0 + |