emacs: Add 'guix-devel-build-package-definition'.

Suggested by Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>.

* emacs/guix-guile.el (guix-guile-definition-regexp): New variable.
  (guix-guile-current-definition, guix-guile-boolean): New functions.
* emacs/guix-devel.el: Require 'guix-base'.
  (guix-devel-repl-processes): New variable.
  (guix-devel-setup-repl, guix-devel-setup-repl-maybe): New functions.
  (guix-devel-build-package-definition): New command.
* doc/emacs.texi (Emacs Development): Document it.

3 files changed, 86 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/doc/emacs.texi b/doc/emacs.texi
index d44d329c5c..b6f2701bc4 100644
--- a/doc/emacs.texi
+++ b/doc/emacs.texi
@@ -659,4 +659,28 @@ want to use a module it defines, so you switch to the Geiser REPL and
 write @code{,use (some module)} there.  You may just use this command
 instead (@code{guix-devel-use-module}).
 
+@item C-c . b
+Build a package defined by the current variable definition.  The
+building process is run in the current Geiser REPL.  If you modified the
+current package definition, don't forget to reevaluate it before calling
+this command---for example, with @kbd{C-M-x} (@pxref{To eval or not to
+eval,,, geiser, Geiser User Manual})
+(@code{guix-devel-build-package-definition}).
+
 @end table
+
+Unluckily, there is a limitation related to long-running REPL commands.
+When there is a running process in a Geiser REPL, you are not supposed
+to evaluate anything in a scheme buffer, because this will ``freeze''
+the REPL: it will stop producing any output (however, the evaluating
+process will continue---you will just not see any progress anymore).  Be
+aware: even moving the point in a scheme buffer may ``break'' the REPL
+if Autodoc (@pxref{Autodoc and friends,,, geiser, Geiser User Manual})
+is enabled (which is the default).
+
+So you have to postpone editing your scheme buffers until the running
+evaluation will be finished in the REPL.
+
+Alternatively, to avoid this limitation, you may just run another Geiser
+REPL, and while something is being evaluated in the previous REPL, you
+can continue editing a scheme file with the help of the current one.
diff --git a/emacs/guix-devel.el b/emacs/guix-devel.el
index ed82e330de..6de49be3e6 100644
--- a/emacs/guix-devel.el
+++ b/emacs/guix-devel.el
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 (require 'guix-guile)
 (require 'guix-geiser)
 (require 'guix-utils)
+(require 'guix-base)
 
 (defgroup guix-devel nil
   "Settings for Guix development utils."
@@ -55,8 +56,47 @@ Interactively, use the module defined by the current scheme file."
   (interactive)
   (guix-copy-as-kill (guix-guile-current-module)))
 
+(defun guix-devel-setup-repl (&optional repl)
+  "Setup REPL for using `guix-devel-...' commands."
+  (guix-devel-use-modules "(guix monad-repl)"
+                          "(guix scripts)"
+                          "(guix store)")
+  ;; Without this workaround, the build output disappears.  See
+  ;; <https://github.com/jaor/geiser/issues/83> for details.
+  (guix-geiser-eval-in-repl
+   "(current-build-output-port (current-error-port))"
+   repl 'no-history 'no-display))
+
+(defvar guix-devel-repl-processes nil
+  "List of REPL processes configured by `guix-devel-setup-repl'.")
+
+(defun guix-devel-setup-repl-maybe (&optional repl)
+  "Setup (if needed) REPL for using `guix-devel-...' commands."
+  (let ((process (get-buffer-process (or repl (guix-geiser-repl)))))
+    (when (and process
+               (not (memq process guix-devel-repl-processes)))
+      (guix-devel-setup-repl repl)
+      (push process guix-devel-repl-processes))))
+
+(defun guix-devel-build-package-definition ()
+  "Build a package defined by the current top-level variable definition."
+  (interactive)
+  (let ((def (guix-guile-current-definition)))
+    (guix-devel-setup-repl-maybe)
+    (guix-devel-use-modules (guix-guile-current-module))
+    (when (or (not guix-operation-confirm)
+              (guix-operation-prompt (format "Build '%s'?" def)))
+      (guix-geiser-eval-in-repl
+       (concat ",run-in-store "
+               (guix-guile-make-call-expression
+                "build-package" def
+                "#:use-substitutes?" (guix-guile-boolean
+                                      guix-use-substitutes)
+                "#:dry-run?" (guix-guile-boolean guix-dry-run)))))))
+
 (defvar guix-devel-keys-map
   (let ((map (make-sparse-keymap)))
+    (define-key map (kbd "b") 'guix-devel-build-package-definition)
     (define-key map (kbd "k") 'guix-devel-copy-module-as-kill)
     (define-key map (kbd "u") 'guix-devel-use-module)
     map)
diff --git a/emacs/guix-guile.el b/emacs/guix-guile.el
index c21d27fca2..35a97d77a3 100644
--- a/emacs/guix-guile.el
+++ b/emacs/guix-guile.el
@@ -26,6 +26,23 @@
 
 (require 'geiser-guile)
 
+(defvar guix-guile-definition-regexp
+  (rx bol "(define"
+      (zero-or-one "*")
+      (zero-or-one "-public")
+      (one-or-more space)
+      (zero-or-one "(")
+      (group (one-or-more (or word (syntax symbol)))))
+  "Regexp used to find the guile definition.")
+
+(defun guix-guile-current-definition ()
+  "Return string with name of the current top-level guile definition."
+  (save-excursion
+    (beginning-of-defun)
+    (if (looking-at guix-guile-definition-regexp)
+        (match-string-no-properties 1)
+      (error "Couldn't find the current definition"))))
+
 (defun guix-guile-current-module ()
   "Return a string with the current guile module.
 Return nil, if current buffer does not define a module."
@@ -37,6 +54,11 @@ Return nil, if current buffer does not define a module."
               (re-search-forward geiser-guile--module-re nil t))
       (match-string-no-properties 1))))
 
+(defun guix-guile-boolean (arg)
+  "Return a string with guile boolean value.
+Transform elisp ARG (nil or non-nil) to the guile boolean (#f or #t)."
+  (concat "#" (prin1-to-string (if arg 't 'f))))
+
 (defun guix-guile-make-call-expression (proc &rest args)
   "Return \"(PROC ARGS ...)\" string.
 PROC and ARGS should be strings."