diff options
author | Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> | 2013-02-12 00:14:20 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> | 2013-02-12 00:14:32 +0100 |
commit | f5fd43602066ad6ecc16460d299d412e7bc12f27 (patch) | |
tree | f628f934e6f9671307df7fc8cd61e8de4ae0bbd3 | |
parent | 151794bf5b8300afac487a7dc9c45de736240730 (diff) | |
download | guix-f5fd43602066ad6ecc16460d299d412e7bc12f27.tar guix-f5fd43602066ad6ecc16460d299d412e7bc12f27.tar.gz |
doc: Add the commit policy to HACKING.
* HACKING (Commit Access): New section.
-rw-r--r-- | HACKING | 26 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -175,3 +175,29 @@ statically-linked; the bootstrap Guile must be relocatable (see patch in the Guix distro); the static-binaries tarball must contain the same programs (Coreutils, Grep, sed, Awk, etc.); and so on. +* Commit Access + +Development is done using the Git distributed version control system. Thus, +access to the repository is not strictly necessary. We welcome contributions +in the form of patches as produced by ‘git format-patch’ sent to +bug-guix@gnu.org. + +However, for frequent contributors, having write access to the repository is +convenient. When you get commit access, please make sure to follow the policy +below (discussions of the policy can take place on bug-guix@gnu.org.) + +Non-trivial patches should always be posted to bug-guix@gnu.org (trivial +patches include fixing typos, etc.) + +For patches that just add a new package, and a simple one, it’s OK to commit, +if you’re confident (which means you successfully built it in a chroot setup.) +Likewise for package upgrades. We have a mailing list for commit +notifications (guix-commits@gnu.org), so people can notice. Before pushing +your changes, make sure to run ‘git pull --rebase’. + +For anything else, please post to bug-guix@gnu.org and leave time for a +review, without committing anything. If you didn’t receive any reply +after two weeks, and if you’re confident, it’s OK to commit. + +That last part is subject to being adjusted, allowing individuals to commit +directly on non-controversial changes on parts they’re familiar with. |