diff options
| author | bremner <bremner@web> | 2009-05-21 18:21:31 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> | 2009-05-21 18:21:31 -0400 |
| commit | 9108d76289d9cf8775d1b284d1b97f442c58070d (patch) | |
| tree | 26b14019a02fd645dfd3c7c7f68b243fbd22804c | |
| parent | ebe7fbae1889cd7ac4ef375bb8903f2b628c9606 (diff) | |
| download | ikiwiki-9108d76289d9cf8775d1b284d1b97f442c58070d.tar ikiwiki-9108d76289d9cf8775d1b284d1b97f442c58070d.tar.gz | |
note that highlight should be slightly easier to call from perl than source-highlight
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn | 5 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn b/doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn index 2bbaeedfa..81ba19bc8 100644 --- a/doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn @@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ releases the 5 or 6 language definitions he has running on his web site, it migh 5 seconds, which isn't bad. And, it has a C++ library, which it seems likely perl bindings could be written for, to eliminate even that overhead. + > [highlight](http://www.andre-simon.de) has similar features to source-highlight, and swig bindings + > that should make it trivial in principle to call from perl. I like highlight a bit better because + > it has a pass-through feature that I find very useful. My memory is unfortunately a bit fuzzy as to how + > well the swig bindings work. [[DavidBremner]] + * Engines that already support a wide variety of file types are of course preferred. If the engine doesn't support a particular type |