aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeteG <PeteG@web>2010-10-05 02:30:25 +0000
committerJoey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>2010-10-05 02:30:25 +0000
commit3f104d1eb7cc15dec0d3a7a67db85fbe63484281 (patch)
tree0d43c9aab236ddd230e47bf6e4f0e86196c44bf3
parent380a80adfa8df712876095d684e8a564b8a86aea (diff)
downloadikiwiki-3f104d1eb7cc15dec0d3a7a67db85fbe63484281.tar
ikiwiki-3f104d1eb7cc15dec0d3a7a67db85fbe63484281.tar.gz
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn6
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn b/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn
index e0c6ebdf1..900d98591 100644
--- a/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn
@@ -69,8 +69,11 @@ Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above.
>>> I have made my own revert branch and put a few fixes in there
>>> (and fixed all the indention..). Issues I noticed but have not gotten
>>> to: --[[Joey]]
+>>>> Please change the git pointer above, then. I will work on your branch. -- [[peteg]]
>>>
>>> * `rcs_diff` already exists; why add `rcs_showpatch`?
+>>>> If `rcs_diff` is intended for human consumption, by all means we can use that. -- [[peteg]]
+
>>> * Would it be better for `rcs_revert` to not commit, and
>>> `rcs_commit_staged` to then be used? This would work for git, but
>>> maybe other RCSs would be problimatic. It would simplifiy the
@@ -79,6 +82,9 @@ Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above.
>>> needs it to chdir, and not the other one. It's running
>>> in the same git repo either way, and git doesn't need
>>> `git show` to run in a subdir at all..
+>>>> I was aping (preserving) what was already there. I don't understand what you say about `git show` - it must run under $srcdir, surely? And empirically the CGI process wasn't in the right place. By all means simplify that. -- [[peteg]]
+
>>> * Probably needs to untaint the revs passed in.
>>> * Seems backwards for `rcs_preprevert` to import and
>>> use `IkiWiki::Receive`.
+>>>> Indeed. This is saying that the checking code in IkiWiki::Receive is in the wrong place. I think it would be better to set up some general hooks and shuffle it into a plugin, for then other plugins that maintain special files in the repo can have a say about validity. -- [[peteg]]