diff options
| author | Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> | 2022-11-23 10:37:11 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> | 2022-12-12 10:49:30 +0000 |
| commit | be0592f3417d9b8f1d34b93e11a0ef345a59fff4 (patch) | |
| tree | da524c8c6646af37056895ec5ca6a07dc931eaf0 /etc | |
| parent | f76ed96f934fc83bb0f974396941c6a90a90e9fc (diff) | |
| download | guix-commit-policy-tweaks.tar guix-commit-policy-tweaks.tar.gz | |
doc: contributing: Tweak the Commit Policy.commit-policy-tweaks
Add more examples of when it can be appropriate to push changes without
review, as I think this can be appropriate in the case of trivial changes (as
mentioned before), but also non-trivial fixes.
No longer suggest pushing simple new packages or package upgrades (that don't
cause lots of rebuilds) without sending to guix-patches. Now there's some
automation for testing changes sent to guix-patches, sending changes there
before pushing can mean that more rigorous testing takes place and help speed
up substitutes becoming available. This is true, even if no human review takes
place.
Only suggest waiting one week for review for simpler changes, wait two weeks
for more significant changes.
Also, reorder some of the information in this section so it's grouped together
better.
* doc/contributing.texi (Commit Policy): Tweak.
Diffstat (limited to 'etc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions