From a7334f5122046b55a5eff425cdaaa3e56c5defed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Mathewson Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:07:15 -0500 Subject: Use log_fn_ratelim in a few places. --- src/or/buffers.c | 11 ++++------- src/or/circuituse.c | 10 +++------- src/or/connection.c | 7 ++----- src/or/router.c | 9 +++------ 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) (limited to 'src') diff --git a/src/or/buffers.c b/src/or/buffers.c index 3a1b4d54f..4d4c87962 100644 --- a/src/or/buffers.c +++ b/src/or/buffers.c @@ -1505,22 +1505,19 @@ log_unsafe_socks_warning(int socks_protocol, const char *address, static ratelim_t socks_ratelim = RATELIM_INIT(SOCKS_WARN_INTERVAL); const or_options_t *options = get_options(); - char *m = NULL; if (! options->WarnUnsafeSocks) return; - if (safe_socks || (m = rate_limit_log(&socks_ratelim, approx_time()))) { - log_warn(LD_APP, + if (safe_socks) { + log_fn_ratelim(&socks_ratelim, LOG_WARN, LD_APP, "Your application (using socks%d to port %d) is giving " "Tor only an IP address. Applications that do DNS resolves " "themselves may leak information. Consider using Socks4A " "(e.g. via privoxy or socat) instead. For more information, " "please see https://wiki.torproject.org/TheOnionRouter/" - "TorFAQ#SOCKSAndDNS.%s%s", + "TorFAQ#SOCKSAndDNS.%s", socks_protocol, (int)port, - safe_socks ? " Rejecting." : "", - m ? m : ""); - tor_free(m); + safe_socks ? " Rejecting." : ""); } control_event_client_status(LOG_WARN, "DANGEROUS_SOCKS PROTOCOL=SOCKS%d ADDRESS=%s:%d", diff --git a/src/or/circuituse.c b/src/or/circuituse.c index c3495b440..2ffffa842 100644 --- a/src/or/circuituse.c +++ b/src/or/circuituse.c @@ -479,17 +479,13 @@ circuit_expire_building(void) continue; } else { static ratelim_t relax_timeout_limit = RATELIM_INIT(3600); - char *m; - if ((m = rate_limit_log(&relax_timeout_limit, approx_time()))) { - log_notice(LD_CIRC, + log_fn_ratelim(&relax_timeout_limit, LOG_NOTICE, LD_CIRC, "No circuits are opened. Relaxed timeout for " "a circuit with channel state %s to %ldms. " "However, it appears the circuit has timed out anyway. " - "%d guards are live. %s", + "%d guards are live.", channel_state_to_string(victim->n_chan->state), - (long)circ_times.close_ms, num_live_entry_guards(0), m); - tor_free(m); - } + (long)circ_times.close_ms, num_live_entry_guards(0)); } } diff --git a/src/or/connection.c b/src/or/connection.c index 740462e7c..5da4d39ba 100644 --- a/src/or/connection.c +++ b/src/or/connection.c @@ -1441,16 +1441,13 @@ connection_connect(connection_t *conn, const char *address, /* We should never even try to connect anyplace if DisableNetwork is set. * Warn if we do, and refuse to make the connection. */ static ratelim_t disablenet_violated = RATELIM_INIT(30*60); - char *m; #ifdef _WIN32 *socket_error = WSAENETUNREACH; #else *socket_error = ENETUNREACH; #endif - if ((m = rate_limit_log(&disablenet_violated, approx_time()))) { - log_warn(LD_BUG, "Tried to open a socket with DisableNetwork set.%s", m); - tor_free(m); - } + log_fn_ratelim(&disablenet_violated, LOG_WARN, LD_BUG, + "Tried to open a socket with DisableNetwork set."); tor_fragile_assert(); return -1; } diff --git a/src/or/router.c b/src/or/router.c index c7380cb44..1a4cee943 100644 --- a/src/or/router.c +++ b/src/or/router.c @@ -936,14 +936,11 @@ consider_testing_reachability(int test_or, int test_dir) if (test_or || test_dir) { #define SELF_EXCLUDED_WARN_INTERVAL 3600 static ratelim_t warning_limit=RATELIM_INIT(SELF_EXCLUDED_WARN_INTERVAL); - char *msg; - if ((msg = rate_limit_log(&warning_limit, approx_time()))) { - log_warn(LD_CIRC, "Can't peform self-tests for this relay: we have " + log_fn_ratelim(&warning_limit, LOG_WARN, LD_CIRC, + "Can't peform self-tests for this relay: we have " "listed ourself in ExcludeNodes, and StrictNodes is set. " "We cannot learn whether we are usable, and will not " - "be able to advertise ourself.%s", msg); - tor_free(msg); - } + "be able to advertise ourself."); } return; } -- cgit v1.2.3