From 1bfda600c338cd8f7d6b9acc7613b5567e6ee03f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Mathewson Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 14:22:21 -0400 Subject: Add a TOR_SOCKET_T_FORMAT construction for logging sockets. We need this since win64 has a 64-bit SOCKET type. Based on a patch from yayooo for 7260, forward-ported to 0.2.4. --- src/or/connection_or.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/or/connection_or.c') diff --git a/src/or/connection_or.c b/src/or/connection_or.c index 9cd56bb89..4f86bf7a8 100644 --- a/src/or/connection_or.c +++ b/src/or/connection_or.c @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ connection_or_group_set_badness(or_connection_t *head, int force) < now) { log_info(LD_OR, "Marking OR conn to %s:%d as too old for new circuits " - "(fd %d, %d secs old).", + "(fd "TOR_SOCKET_T_FORMAT", %d secs old).", or_conn->base_.address, or_conn->base_.port, or_conn->base_.s, (int)(now - or_conn->base_.timestamp_created)); connection_or_mark_bad_for_new_circs(or_conn); @@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ connection_or_group_set_badness(or_connection_t *head, int force) * and this one is open but not canonical. Mark it bad. */ log_info(LD_OR, "Marking OR conn to %s:%d as unsuitable for new circuits: " - "(fd %d, %d secs old). It is not canonical, and we have " + "(fd "TOR_SOCKET_T_FORMAT", %d secs old). It is not canonical, and we have " "another connection to that OR that is.", or_conn->base_.address, or_conn->base_.port, or_conn->base_.s, (int)(now - or_conn->base_.timestamp_created)); @@ -928,8 +928,9 @@ connection_or_group_set_badness(or_connection_t *head, int force) if (best->is_canonical) { log_info(LD_OR, "Marking OR conn to %s:%d as unsuitable for new circuits: " - "(fd %d, %d secs old). We have a better canonical one " - "(fd %d; %d secs old).", + "(fd "TOR_SOCKET_T_FORMAT", %d secs old). " + "We have a better canonical one " + "(fd "TOR_SOCKET_T_FORMAT"; %d secs old).", or_conn->base_.address, or_conn->base_.port, or_conn->base_.s, (int)(now - or_conn->base_.timestamp_created), best->base_.s, (int)(now - best->base_.timestamp_created)); @@ -938,8 +939,9 @@ connection_or_group_set_badness(or_connection_t *head, int force) &best->real_addr, CMP_EXACT)) { log_info(LD_OR, "Marking OR conn to %s:%d as unsuitable for new circuits: " - "(fd %d, %d secs old). We have a better one with the " - "same address (fd %d; %d secs old).", + "(fd "TOR_SOCKET_T_FORMAT", %d secs old). We have a better " + "one with the " + "same address (fd "TOR_SOCKET_T_FORMAT"; %d secs old).", or_conn->base_.address, or_conn->base_.port, or_conn->base_.s, (int)(now - or_conn->base_.timestamp_created), best->base_.s, (int)(now - best->base_.timestamp_created)); @@ -1241,7 +1243,8 @@ connection_tls_start_handshake(or_connection_t *conn, int receiving) } #endif connection_start_reading(TO_CONN(conn)); - log_debug(LD_HANDSHAKE,"starting TLS handshake on fd %d", conn->base_.s); + log_debug(LD_HANDSHAKE,"starting TLS handshake on fd "TOR_SOCKET_T_FORMAT, + conn->base_.s); note_crypto_pk_op(receiving ? TLS_HANDSHAKE_S : TLS_HANDSHAKE_C); IF_HAS_BUFFEREVENT(TO_CONN(conn), { @@ -1898,7 +1901,8 @@ connection_or_process_cells_from_inbuf(or_connection_t *conn) while (1) { log_debug(LD_OR, - "%d: starting, inbuf_datalen %d (%d pending in tls object).", + TOR_SOCKET_T_FORMAT": starting, inbuf_datalen %d " + "(%d pending in tls object).", conn->base_.s,(int)connection_get_inbuf_len(TO_CONN(conn)), tor_tls_get_pending_bytes(conn->tls)); if (connection_fetch_var_cell_from_buf(conn, &var_cell)) { -- cgit v1.2.3