| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On platforms with the backtrace/backtrace_symbols_fd interface, Tor
can now dump stack traces on assertion failure. By default, I log
them to DataDir/stack_dump and to stderr.
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
src/common/include.am
Conflict was from adding testsupport.h near where sandbox.h had
already been added.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If you pass the --enable-coverage flag on the command line, we build
our testing binaries with appropriate options eo enable coverage
testing. We also build a "tor-cov" binary that has coverage enabled,
for integration tests.
On recent OSX versions, test coverage only works with clang, not gcc.
So we warn about that.
Also add a contrib/coverage script to actually run gcov with the
appropriate options to generate useful .gcov files. (Thanks to
automake, the .o files will not have the names that gcov expects to
find.)
Also, remove generated gcda and gcno files on clean.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is mainly a matter of automake trickery: we build each static
library in two versions now: one with the TOR_UNIT_TESTS macro
defined, and one without. When TOR_UNIT_TESTS is defined, we can
enable mocking and expose more functions. When it's not defined, we
can lock the binary down more.
The alternatives would be to have alternate build modes: a "testing
configuration" for building the libraries with test support, and a
"production configuration" for building them without. I don't favor
that approach, since I think it would mean more people runnning
binaries build for testing, or more people not running unit tests.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
| |
It's controlled by the new Sandbox argument. Right now, it's rather
coarse-grained, it's Linux-only, and it may break some features.
|
|\ |
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The fix is to move the two functions to format/parse base64
curve25519 public keys into a new "crypto_format.c" file. I could
have put them in crypto.c, but that's a big file worth splitting
anyway.
Fixes bug 8153; bugfix on 0.2.4.8-alpha where I did the fix for 7869.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This lets us give it compiler flags differing from the rest of
libor-crypto.a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We want to use donna-c64 when we have a GCC with support for
64x64->uint128_t multiplying. If not, we want to use libnacl if we
can, unless it's giving us the unsafe "ref" implementation. And if
that isn't going to work, we'd like to use the
portable-and-safe-but-slow 32-bit "donna" implementation.
We might need more library searching for the correct libnacl,
especially once the next libnacl release is out -- it's likely to have
bunches of better curve25519 implementations.
I also define a set of curve25519 wrapper functions, though it really
shouldn't be necessary.
We should eventually make the -donna*.c files get build with
-fomit-frame-pointer, since that can make a difference.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The rationale for treating these files differently is that we should
be checking upstream for changes as applicable, and merging changes
upstream as warranted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
097 hasn't seen a new version since 2007; we can drop support too.
This lets us remove our built-in sha256 implementation, and some
checks for old bugs.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were trying to incorporate all headers in common_sha1.i, not just
the src/common ones.
This is part of bug 6778; fix on 0.2.4.1-alpha
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
still a bit odd)
|
| |
|
|
This gives us a few benefits:
1) make -j clean all
this will start working, as it should. It currently doesn't.
2) increased parallel build
recursive make will max out at number of files in a directory,
non-recursive make doesn't have such a limitation
3) Removal of duplicate information in make files,
less error prone
I've also slightly updated how we call AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, as the way
that was used was not only deprecated but will be *removed* in the next
major automake release (1.13).... so probably best that we can continue
to bulid tor without requiring old automake.
(see http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Public-Macros.html )
For more reasons why, see resources such as:
http://miller.emu.id.au/pmiller/books/rmch/
|