| Commit message (Expand) | Author | Age |
|---|
| ... | |
| * | touchups. hope i didn't clobber too much of nick's plans. | Roger Dingledine | 2006-11-08 |
| * | r9470@Kushana: nickm | 2006-11-02 16:57:32 -0500 | Nick Mathewson | 2006-11-03 |
| * | r9454@Kushana: nickm | 2006-10-31 15:29:47 -0500 | Nick Mathewson | 2006-10-31 |
| * | r9453@Kushana: nickm | 2006-10-31 15:29:15 -0500 | Nick Mathewson | 2006-10-31 |
| * | r9450@Kushana: nickm | 2006-10-31 14:16:35 -0500 | Nick Mathewson | 2006-10-31 |
| * | a few more discovery pieces, so i have something to send nart | Roger Dingledine | 2006-10-31 |
| * | and a few more bibtex entries | Roger Dingledine | 2006-10-29 |
| * | motivate families-of-bridges better | Roger Dingledine | 2006-10-29 |
| * | put in a lot of blocking-related roadmap items, all of which | Roger Dingledine | 2006-10-29 |
| * | two easy discovery approaches, plus a discussion of publicity, | Roger Dingledine | 2006-10-28 |
| * | another paragraph of pessimism for the network signature section | Roger Dingledine | 2006-10-25 |
| * | r9382@Kushana: nickm | 2006-10-24 22:01:18 -0400 | Nick Mathewson | 2006-10-25 |
| * | Section 6: Hiding Tor's network signatures | Roger Dingledine | 2006-10-24 |
| * | Section 5: The relay component of our blocking-resistant design. | Roger Dingledine | 2006-10-24 |
| * | r9367@Kushana: nickm | 2006-10-24 01:55:21 -0400 | Nick Mathewson | 2006-10-24 |
| * | add some more items for the roadmap, and clean some up | Roger Dingledine | 2006-10-23 |
| * | r9360@Kushana: nickm | 2006-10-23 16:34:25 -0400 | Nick Mathewson | 2006-10-23 |
| * | r9345@Kushana: nickm | 2006-10-23 00:52:42 -0400 | Nick Mathewson | 2006-10-23 |
| * | r9321@Kushana: nickm | 2006-10-22 19:45:23 -0400 | Nick Mathewson | 2006-10-23 |
| * | Explain why tor is well-suited for the relay component of a | Roger Dingledine | 2006-10-23 |
| * | a few more tweaks and a new subsection | Roger Dingledine | 2006-10-12 |
| * | dump more ideas in the blocking paper | Roger Dingledine | 2006-10-12 |
| * | Motivate and introduce blocking.tex better. | Roger Dingledine | 2006-10-12 |
| * | more progress on the blocking-resistance design | Roger Dingledine | 2006-10-05 |
| * | misc touchups | Roger Dingledine | 2006-10-01 |
| * | continue fleshing out the blocking-resistance design doc | Roger Dingledine | 2006-09-13 |
| * | two more thoughts to consider for blocking resistance | Roger Dingledine | 2006-08-12 |
| * | initial skeleton for issues to resolve re: blocking resistance. | Roger Dingledine | 2006-08-10 |
| * | Remove .cvsignore files from trunk | Peter Palfrader | 2006-07-25 |
| * | Add several files to cvsignores | Nick Mathewson | 2005-04-01 |
| * | make the wikipedia statement less strict | Roger Dingledine | 2005-02-14 |
| * | some more tweaks on the paper | Roger Dingledine | 2005-02-10 |
| * | More tweaks, grammar, etc. I say it's ready to submit. | Paul Syverson | 2005-02-09 |
| * | fix wordo | Roger Dingledine | 2005-02-09 |
| * | This section is first up against the wall when the revolution comes. | Roger Dingledine | 2005-02-09 |
| * | mark this one as a draft, so people who cache it will look dumb | Roger Dingledine | 2005-02-09 |
| * | update pdf draft | Roger Dingledine | 2005-02-09 |
| * | Style wars | Paul Syverson | 2005-02-09 |
| * | put a pdf in place so people can read it. | Roger Dingledine | 2005-02-09 |
| * | more fixes. i declare this the first draft. | Roger Dingledine | 2005-02-09 |
| * | tighten related work | Roger Dingledine | 2005-02-09 |
| * | not all tor use is abusive | Roger Dingledine | 2005-02-09 |
| * | Commit changes to nonclique section | Nick Mathewson | 2005-02-09 |
| * | blacklists, middleman nodes, pressure to shut down | Roger Dingledine | 2005-02-09 |
| * | lots more cleanups. people should check these over. | Roger Dingledine | 2005-02-09 |
| * | Still more edits | Nick Mathewson | 2005-02-08 |
| * | ispell | Roger Dingledine | 2005-02-08 |
| * | Tighten, clarify | Nick Mathewson | 2005-02-08 |
| * | A few more minor tweaks | Paul Syverson | 2005-02-08 |
| * | Tweaks and typos throughout. Nearly there. | Paul Syverson | 2005-02-08 |