| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |\ |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
so that parse_log_domain() doesn't fail.
|
| |\ \ |
|
| | |\ \ |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
George Kadianakis notes that if you give crypto_rand_int() a value
above INT_MAX, it can return a negative number, which is not what
the documentation would imply.
The simple solution is to assert that the input is in [1,INT_MAX+1].
If in the future we need a random-value function that can return
values up to UINT_MAX, we can add one.
Fixes bug 3306; bugfix on 0.2.2pre14.
|
| |\| | | |
|
| | |\ \ \
| | |/ /
| |/| | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\| | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
When we added the check for key size, we required that the keys be
128 bytes. But RSA_size (which defers to BN_num_bytes) will return
128 for keys of length 1017..1024. This patch adds a new
crypto_pk_num_bits() that returns the actual number of significant
bits in the modulus, and uses that to enforce key sizes.
Also, credit the original bug3318 in the changes file.
|
| |\| | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This log message should be a 'protocol warning', not a 'warning'.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
hid_serv_responsible_for_desc_id's return value is never negative, and
there is no need to search through the consensus to find out whether we
are responsible for a descriptor ID before we look in our cache for a
descriptor.
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |\| | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
UseBridges 1 now means "connect only to bridges; if you know no
bridges, don't make connections." UseBridges auto means "Use bridges
if they are known, and we have no EntryNodes set, and we aren't a
server." UseBridges 0 means "don't use bridges."
|
| |\| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Conflicts:
src/or/rendclient.c
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
I hope these will never be useful, but having them and not needing them is
better than needing them and not having them.
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Fixes bug #3309.
|
| | | | |/ / /
| | |/| | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Previously, Tor would dereference a NULL pointer and crash if
lookup_last_hid_serv_request were called before the first call to
directory_clean_last_hid_serv_requests. As far as I can tell, that's
currently impossible, but I want that undocumented invariant to go away
in case I^Wwe break it someday.
|
| |\| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This merge was a bit nontrivial, since I had to write a new
node_is_a_configured_bridge to parallel router_is_a_configured_bridge.
Conflicts:
src/or/circuitbuild.c
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
If you had configured a bridge but then switched to a different bridge
via the controller, you would still be willing to use the old one.
|
| |\| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Conflicts:
src/or/dirserv.c
|
| | | |/ / / /
| |/| | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
options->DirPort is 0 in the unit tests, so
router_get_advertised_dir_port() would return 0 so we wouldn't pick a
dirport. This isn't what we want for the unit tests. Fixes bug
introduced in 95ac3ea5946.
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |\| | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
An elusive compile-error (MingW-gcc v4.50 on Win_XP); a missing
comma (!) and a typo ('err_msg' at line 277 changed to 'errmsg').
Aso changed the format for 'err_code' at line 293 into a "%ld" to suppress
a warning. How did this go unnoticed for ~1 month? Btw. This is my 1st ever
'git commit', so it better work.
|
| |\| | | | | |
|
| | |/ / / /
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
When we introduced NEED_KEY_1024 in routerparse.c back in
0.2.0.1-alpha, I forgot to add a *8 when logging the length of a
bad-length key.
Bugfix for 3318 on 0.2.0.1-alpha.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
The patch for 3228 made us try to run init_keys() before we had loaded
our state file, resulting in an assert inside init_keys. We had moved
it too early in the function.
Now it's later in the function, but still above the accounting calls.
|
| |\| | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
The previous attempt was incomplete: it told us not to publish a
descriptor, but didn't stop us from generating one. Now we treat an
absent OR port the same as not knowing our address. (This means
that when we _do_ get an OR port, we need to mark the descriptor
dirty.)
More attempt to fix bug3216.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This situation can happen easily if you set 'ORPort auto' and
'AccountingMax'. Doing so means that when you have no ORPort, you
won't be able to set an ORPort in a descriptor, so instead you would
just generate lots of invalid descriptors, freaking out all the time.
Possible fix for 3216; fix on 0.2.2.26-beta.
|
| |\| | | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
This simple implementation has a few issues, but it should do for
0.2.2.x. We will want to revisit this later and make it smarter.
|
| | |/ / / / / |
|
| |\| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
The conflicts were mainly caused by the routerinfo->node transition.
Conflicts:
src/or/circuitbuild.c
src/or/command.c
src/or/connection_edge.c
src/or/directory.c
src/or/dirserv.c
src/or/relay.c
src/or/rendservice.c
src/or/routerlist.c
|
| | | | | | | |
|