| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This involves some duplicate code between backtrace.c and sandbox.c,
but I don't see a way around it: calling more functions would mean
adding more steps to our call stack, and running clean_backtrace()
against the wrong point on the stack.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Tor doesn't use it directly, but the glibc backtrace-to-fd code does
|
| |
|
|
| |
Resolves ticket 5286.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Fixes bug 11460; bug only affects unit tests and is not in any
released version of Tor.
|
| |\ |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Otherwise, when we report "identity mismatch", we then later report
DONE when the connection gets closed.
Fixes bug 10431; bugfix on 0.2.1.1-alpha.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \ |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The major changes are to re-order some ciphers, to drop the ECDH suites
(note: *not* ECDHE: ECDHE is still there), to kill off some made-up
stuff (like the SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA suite), to drop
some of the DSS suites... *and* to enable the ECDHE+GCM ciphersuites.
This change is autogenerated by get_mozilla_ciphers.py from
Firefox 28 and OpenSSL 1.0.1g.
Resolves ticket 11438.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This commit does nothing other than pull the changes/* files into
ChangeLog, sorted by declared type. I haven't comined any entries or
vetted anything yet.
|
| |\ \ \ |
|
| | |\ \ \
| | |/ /
| |/| | |
|
| | |/ /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fixes bug 11437; bugfix on 0.2.4.7-alpha.
Found by coverity; this is CID 1198198.
|
| |\ \ \ |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
fixes bug 11426; bugfix on 0.2.5.3-alpha, where csiphash was
introduced.
|
| |\ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
When we successfully create a usable circuit after it previously
timed out for a certain amount of time, we should make sure that
our public IP address hasn't changed and update our descriptor.
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Conflicts:
src/test/include.am
src/test/test.c
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Found by testing with chutney. The old behavior was "fail an
assertion", which obviously isn't optimal.
Bugfix on 8b9a2cb68b290e550695124d7ef0511225b451d5; bug not in any
released version.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This gets coverage of everything except for the cases which should be
impossible.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |\| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Conflicts:
src/or/circuitlist.c
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
On busy servers, this function takes up something like 3-7% in
different profiles, and gets invoked every time we need to participate
as the midpoint in a hidden service.
So maybe walking through a linked list of all the circuits here wasn't
a good idea.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
In C, it's a bad idea to do this:
char *cp = array;
char *end = array + array_len;
/* .... */
if (cp + 3 >= end) { /* out of bounds */ }
because cp+3 might be more than one off the end of the array, and
you are only allowed to construct pointers to the array elements,
and to an element one past the end. Instead you have to say
if (cp - array + 3 >= array_len) { /* ... */ }
or something like that.
This patch fixes two of these: one in process_versions_cell
introduced in 0.2.0.10-alpha, and one in process_certs_cell
introduced in 0.2.3.6-alpha. These are both tracked under bug
10363. "bobnomnom" found and reported both. See also 10313.
In our code, this is likely to be a problem as we used it only if we
get a nasty allocator that makes allocations end close to (void*)-1.
But it's best not to have to worry about such things at all, so
let's just fix all of these we can find.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|_|_|_|/ / /
|/| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |/ / / / / / / / / |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | |_|_|_|_|_|_|/
| |/| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Fix for 9650; bugfix for 0.2.3.16-alpha.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Conflicts:
src/common/address.c
src/or/config.c
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(Not a bugfix on any Tor release; before 10801_024, it didn't handle
portless addresses at all.)
|