aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/or/circpathbias.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/or/circpathbias.c')
-rw-r--r--src/or/circpathbias.c1538
1 files changed, 1538 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/or/circpathbias.c b/src/or/circpathbias.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..51a75cf50
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/or/circpathbias.c
@@ -0,0 +1,1538 @@
+/* Copyright (c) 2001 Matej Pfajfar.
+ * Copyright (c) 2001-2004, Roger Dingledine.
+ * Copyright (c) 2004-2006, Roger Dingledine, Nick Mathewson.
+ * Copyright (c) 2007-2013, The Tor Project, Inc. */
+/* See LICENSE for licensing information */
+
+#include "or.h"
+#include "channel.h"
+#include "circpathbias.h"
+#include "circuitbuild.h"
+#include "circuitlist.h"
+#include "circuituse.h"
+#include "circuitstats.h"
+#include "connection_edge.h"
+#include "config.h"
+#include "entrynodes.h"
+#include "networkstatus.h"
+#include "relay.h"
+
+static void pathbias_count_successful_close(origin_circuit_t *circ);
+static void pathbias_count_collapse(origin_circuit_t *circ);
+static void pathbias_count_use_failed(origin_circuit_t *circ);
+static void pathbias_measure_use_rate(entry_guard_t *guard);
+static void pathbias_measure_close_rate(entry_guard_t *guard);
+static void pathbias_scale_use_rates(entry_guard_t *guard);
+static void pathbias_scale_close_rates(entry_guard_t *guard);
+static int entry_guard_inc_circ_attempt_count(entry_guard_t *guard);
+
+/** Increment the number of times we successfully extended a circuit to
+ * <b>guard</b>, first checking if the failure rate is high enough that
+ * we should eliminate the guard. Return -1 if the guard looks no good;
+ * return 0 if the guard looks fine.
+ */
+static int
+entry_guard_inc_circ_attempt_count(entry_guard_t *guard)
+{
+ entry_guards_changed();
+
+ pathbias_measure_close_rate(guard);
+
+ if (guard->path_bias_disabled)
+ return -1;
+
+ pathbias_scale_close_rates(guard);
+ guard->circ_attempts++;
+
+ log_info(LD_CIRC, "Got success count %f/%f for guard %s ($%s)",
+ guard->circ_successes, guard->circ_attempts, guard->nickname,
+ hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/** The minimum number of circuit attempts before we start
+ * thinking about warning about path bias and dropping guards */
+static int
+pathbias_get_min_circs(const or_options_t *options)
+{
+#define DFLT_PATH_BIAS_MIN_CIRC 150
+ if (options->PathBiasCircThreshold >= 5)
+ return options->PathBiasCircThreshold;
+ else
+ return networkstatus_get_param(NULL, "pb_mincircs",
+ DFLT_PATH_BIAS_MIN_CIRC,
+ 5, INT32_MAX);
+}
+
+/** The circuit success rate below which we issue a notice */
+static double
+pathbias_get_notice_rate(const or_options_t *options)
+{
+#define DFLT_PATH_BIAS_NOTICE_PCT 70
+ if (options->PathBiasNoticeRate >= 0.0)
+ return options->PathBiasNoticeRate;
+ else
+ return networkstatus_get_param(NULL, "pb_noticepct",
+ DFLT_PATH_BIAS_NOTICE_PCT, 0, 100)/100.0;
+}
+
+/* XXXX024 I'd like to have this be static again, but entrynodes.c needs it. */
+/** The circuit success rate below which we issue a warn */
+static double
+pathbias_get_warn_rate(const or_options_t *options)
+{
+#define DFLT_PATH_BIAS_WARN_PCT 50
+ if (options->PathBiasWarnRate >= 0.0)
+ return options->PathBiasWarnRate;
+ else
+ return networkstatus_get_param(NULL, "pb_warnpct",
+ DFLT_PATH_BIAS_WARN_PCT, 0, 100)/100.0;
+}
+
+/* XXXX024 I'd like to have this be static again, but entrynodes.c needs it. */
+/**
+ * The extreme rate is the rate at which we would drop the guard,
+ * if pb_dropguard is also set. Otherwise we just warn.
+ */
+double
+pathbias_get_extreme_rate(const or_options_t *options)
+{
+#define DFLT_PATH_BIAS_EXTREME_PCT 30
+ if (options->PathBiasExtremeRate >= 0.0)
+ return options->PathBiasExtremeRate;
+ else
+ return networkstatus_get_param(NULL, "pb_extremepct",
+ DFLT_PATH_BIAS_EXTREME_PCT, 0, 100)/100.0;
+}
+
+/* XXXX024 I'd like to have this be static again, but entrynodes.c needs it. */
+/**
+ * If 1, we actually disable use of guards that fall below
+ * the extreme_pct.
+ */
+int
+pathbias_get_dropguards(const or_options_t *options)
+{
+#define DFLT_PATH_BIAS_DROP_GUARDS 0
+ if (options->PathBiasDropGuards >= 0)
+ return options->PathBiasDropGuards;
+ else
+ return networkstatus_get_param(NULL, "pb_dropguards",
+ DFLT_PATH_BIAS_DROP_GUARDS, 0, 1);
+}
+
+/**
+ * This is the number of circuits at which we scale our
+ * counts by mult_factor/scale_factor. Note, this count is
+ * not exact, as we only perform the scaling in the event
+ * of no integer truncation.
+ */
+static int
+pathbias_get_scale_threshold(const or_options_t *options)
+{
+#define DFLT_PATH_BIAS_SCALE_THRESHOLD 300
+ if (options->PathBiasScaleThreshold >= 10)
+ return options->PathBiasScaleThreshold;
+ else
+ return networkstatus_get_param(NULL, "pb_scalecircs",
+ DFLT_PATH_BIAS_SCALE_THRESHOLD, 10,
+ INT32_MAX);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Compute the path bias scaling ratio from the consensus
+ * parameters pb_multfactor/pb_scalefactor.
+ *
+ * Returns a value in (0, 1.0] which we multiply our pathbias
+ * counts with to scale them down.
+ */
+static double
+pathbias_get_scale_ratio(const or_options_t *options)
+{
+ /*
+ * The scale factor is the denominator for our scaling
+ * of circuit counts for our path bias window.
+ *
+ * Note that our use of doubles for the path bias state
+ * file means that powers of 2 work best here.
+ */
+ int denominator = networkstatus_get_param(NULL, "pb_scalefactor",
+ 2, 2, INT32_MAX);
+ (void) options;
+ /**
+ * The mult factor is the numerator for our scaling
+ * of circuit counts for our path bias window. It
+ * allows us to scale by fractions.
+ */
+ return networkstatus_get_param(NULL, "pb_multfactor",
+ 1, 1, denominator)/((double)denominator);
+}
+
+/** The minimum number of circuit usage attempts before we start
+ * thinking about warning about path use bias and dropping guards */
+static int
+pathbias_get_min_use(const or_options_t *options)
+{
+#define DFLT_PATH_BIAS_MIN_USE 20
+ if (options->PathBiasUseThreshold >= 3)
+ return options->PathBiasUseThreshold;
+ else
+ return networkstatus_get_param(NULL, "pb_minuse",
+ DFLT_PATH_BIAS_MIN_USE,
+ 3, INT32_MAX);
+}
+
+/** The circuit use success rate below which we issue a notice */
+static double
+pathbias_get_notice_use_rate(const or_options_t *options)
+{
+#define DFLT_PATH_BIAS_NOTICE_USE_PCT 80
+ if (options->PathBiasNoticeUseRate >= 0.0)
+ return options->PathBiasNoticeUseRate;
+ else
+ return networkstatus_get_param(NULL, "pb_noticeusepct",
+ DFLT_PATH_BIAS_NOTICE_USE_PCT,
+ 0, 100)/100.0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * The extreme use rate is the rate at which we would drop the guard,
+ * if pb_dropguard is also set. Otherwise we just warn.
+ */
+double
+pathbias_get_extreme_use_rate(const or_options_t *options)
+{
+#define DFLT_PATH_BIAS_EXTREME_USE_PCT 60
+ if (options->PathBiasExtremeUseRate >= 0.0)
+ return options->PathBiasExtremeUseRate;
+ else
+ return networkstatus_get_param(NULL, "pb_extremeusepct",
+ DFLT_PATH_BIAS_EXTREME_USE_PCT,
+ 0, 100)/100.0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * This is the number of circuits at which we scale our
+ * use counts by mult_factor/scale_factor. Note, this count is
+ * not exact, as we only perform the scaling in the event
+ * of no integer truncation.
+ */
+static int
+pathbias_get_scale_use_threshold(const or_options_t *options)
+{
+#define DFLT_PATH_BIAS_SCALE_USE_THRESHOLD 100
+ if (options->PathBiasScaleUseThreshold >= 10)
+ return options->PathBiasScaleUseThreshold;
+ else
+ return networkstatus_get_param(NULL, "pb_scaleuse",
+ DFLT_PATH_BIAS_SCALE_USE_THRESHOLD,
+ 10, INT32_MAX);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Convert a Guard's path state to string.
+ */
+const char *
+pathbias_state_to_string(path_state_t state)
+{
+ switch (state) {
+ case PATH_STATE_NEW_CIRC:
+ return "new";
+ case PATH_STATE_BUILD_ATTEMPTED:
+ return "build attempted";
+ case PATH_STATE_BUILD_SUCCEEDED:
+ return "build succeeded";
+ case PATH_STATE_USE_ATTEMPTED:
+ return "use attempted";
+ case PATH_STATE_USE_SUCCEEDED:
+ return "use succeeded";
+ case PATH_STATE_USE_FAILED:
+ return "use failed";
+ case PATH_STATE_ALREADY_COUNTED:
+ return "already counted";
+ }
+
+ return "unknown";
+}
+
+/**
+ * This function decides if a circuit has progressed far enough to count
+ * as a circuit "attempt". As long as end-to-end tagging is possible,
+ * we assume the adversary will use it over hop-to-hop failure. Therefore,
+ * we only need to account bias for the last hop. This should make us
+ * much more resilient to ambient circuit failure, and also make that
+ * failure easier to measure (we only need to measure Exit failure rates).
+ */
+static int
+pathbias_is_new_circ_attempt(origin_circuit_t *circ)
+{
+#define N2N_TAGGING_IS_POSSIBLE
+#ifdef N2N_TAGGING_IS_POSSIBLE
+ /* cpath is a circular list. We want circs with more than one hop,
+ * and the second hop must be waiting for keys still (it's just
+ * about to get them). */
+ return circ->cpath &&
+ circ->cpath->next != circ->cpath &&
+ circ->cpath->next->state == CPATH_STATE_AWAITING_KEYS;
+#else
+ /* If tagging attacks are no longer possible, we probably want to
+ * count bias from the first hop. However, one could argue that
+ * timing-based tagging is still more useful than per-hop failure.
+ * In which case, we'd never want to use this.
+ */
+ return circ->cpath &&
+ circ->cpath->state == CPATH_STATE_AWAITING_KEYS;
+#endif
+}
+
+/**
+ * Decide if the path bias code should count a circuit.
+ *
+ * @returns 1 if we should count it, 0 otherwise.
+ */
+static int
+pathbias_should_count(origin_circuit_t *circ)
+{
+#define PATHBIAS_COUNT_INTERVAL (600)
+ static ratelim_t count_limit =
+ RATELIM_INIT(PATHBIAS_COUNT_INTERVAL);
+ char *rate_msg = NULL;
+
+ /* We can't do path bias accounting without entry guards.
+ * Testing and controller circuits also have no guards.
+ *
+ * We also don't count server-side rends, because their
+ * endpoint could be chosen maliciously.
+ * Similarly, we can't count client-side intro attempts,
+ * because clients can be manipulated into connecting to
+ * malicious intro points. */
+ if (get_options()->UseEntryGuards == 0 ||
+ circ->base_.purpose == CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_TESTING ||
+ circ->base_.purpose == CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER ||
+ circ->base_.purpose == CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_S_CONNECT_REND ||
+ circ->base_.purpose == CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_S_REND_JOINED ||
+ (circ->base_.purpose >= CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_INTRODUCING &&
+ circ->base_.purpose <= CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_INTRODUCE_ACKED)) {
+
+ /* Check to see if the shouldcount result has changed due to a
+ * unexpected purpose change that would affect our results.
+ *
+ * The reason we check the path state too here is because for the
+ * cannibalized versions of these purposes, we count them as successful
+ * before their purpose change.
+ */
+ if (circ->pathbias_shouldcount == PATHBIAS_SHOULDCOUNT_COUNTED
+ && circ->path_state != PATH_STATE_ALREADY_COUNTED) {
+ log_info(LD_BUG,
+ "Circuit %d is now being ignored despite being counted "
+ "in the past. Purpose is %s, path state is %s",
+ circ->global_identifier,
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ pathbias_state_to_string(circ->path_state));
+ }
+ circ->pathbias_shouldcount = PATHBIAS_SHOULDCOUNT_IGNORED;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* Completely ignore one hop circuits */
+ if (circ->build_state->onehop_tunnel ||
+ circ->build_state->desired_path_len == 1) {
+ /* Check for inconsistency */
+ if (circ->build_state->desired_path_len != 1 ||
+ !circ->build_state->onehop_tunnel) {
+ if ((rate_msg = rate_limit_log(&count_limit, approx_time()))) {
+ log_info(LD_BUG,
+ "One-hop circuit has length %d. Path state is %s. "
+ "Circuit is a %s currently %s.%s",
+ circ->build_state->desired_path_len,
+ pathbias_state_to_string(circ->path_state),
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->base_.state),
+ rate_msg);
+ tor_free(rate_msg);
+ }
+ tor_fragile_assert();
+ }
+
+ /* Check to see if the shouldcount result has changed due to a
+ * unexpected change that would affect our results */
+ if (circ->pathbias_shouldcount == PATHBIAS_SHOULDCOUNT_COUNTED) {
+ log_info(LD_BUG,
+ "One-hop circuit %d is now being ignored despite being counted "
+ "in the past. Purpose is %s, path state is %s",
+ circ->global_identifier,
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ pathbias_state_to_string(circ->path_state));
+ }
+ circ->pathbias_shouldcount = PATHBIAS_SHOULDCOUNT_IGNORED;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* Check to see if the shouldcount result has changed due to a
+ * unexpected purpose change that would affect our results */
+ if (circ->pathbias_shouldcount == PATHBIAS_SHOULDCOUNT_IGNORED) {
+ log_info(LD_BUG,
+ "Circuit %d is now being counted despite being ignored "
+ "in the past. Purpose is %s, path state is %s",
+ circ->global_identifier,
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ pathbias_state_to_string(circ->path_state));
+ }
+ circ->pathbias_shouldcount = PATHBIAS_SHOULDCOUNT_COUNTED;
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Check our circuit state to see if this is a successful circuit attempt.
+ * If so, record it in the current guard's path bias circ_attempt count.
+ *
+ * Also check for several potential error cases for bug #6475.
+ */
+int
+pathbias_count_build_attempt(origin_circuit_t *circ)
+{
+#define CIRC_ATTEMPT_NOTICE_INTERVAL (600)
+ static ratelim_t circ_attempt_notice_limit =
+ RATELIM_INIT(CIRC_ATTEMPT_NOTICE_INTERVAL);
+ char *rate_msg = NULL;
+
+ if (!pathbias_should_count(circ)) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (pathbias_is_new_circ_attempt(circ)) {
+ /* Help track down the real cause of bug #6475: */
+ if (circ->has_opened && circ->path_state != PATH_STATE_BUILD_ATTEMPTED) {
+ if ((rate_msg = rate_limit_log(&circ_attempt_notice_limit,
+ approx_time()))) {
+ log_info(LD_BUG,
+ "Opened circuit is in strange path state %s. "
+ "Circuit is a %s currently %s.%s",
+ pathbias_state_to_string(circ->path_state),
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->base_.state),
+ rate_msg);
+ tor_free(rate_msg);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Don't re-count cannibalized circs.. */
+ if (!circ->has_opened) {
+ entry_guard_t *guard = NULL;
+
+ if (circ->cpath && circ->cpath->extend_info) {
+ guard = entry_guard_get_by_id_digest(
+ circ->cpath->extend_info->identity_digest);
+ } else if (circ->base_.n_chan) {
+ guard =
+ entry_guard_get_by_id_digest(circ->base_.n_chan->identity_digest);
+ }
+
+ if (guard) {
+ if (circ->path_state == PATH_STATE_NEW_CIRC) {
+ circ->path_state = PATH_STATE_BUILD_ATTEMPTED;
+
+ if (entry_guard_inc_circ_attempt_count(guard) < 0) {
+ /* Bogus guard; we already warned. */
+ return -END_CIRC_REASON_TORPROTOCOL;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if ((rate_msg = rate_limit_log(&circ_attempt_notice_limit,
+ approx_time()))) {
+ log_info(LD_BUG,
+ "Unopened circuit has strange path state %s. "
+ "Circuit is a %s currently %s.%s",
+ pathbias_state_to_string(circ->path_state),
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->base_.state),
+ rate_msg);
+ tor_free(rate_msg);
+ }
+ }
+ } else {
+ if ((rate_msg = rate_limit_log(&circ_attempt_notice_limit,
+ approx_time()))) {
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Unopened circuit has no known guard. "
+ "Circuit is a %s currently %s.%s",
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->base_.state),
+ rate_msg);
+ tor_free(rate_msg);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Check our circuit state to see if this is a successful circuit
+ * completion. If so, record it in the current guard's path bias
+ * success count.
+ *
+ * Also check for several potential error cases for bug #6475.
+ */
+void
+pathbias_count_build_success(origin_circuit_t *circ)
+{
+#define SUCCESS_NOTICE_INTERVAL (600)
+ static ratelim_t success_notice_limit =
+ RATELIM_INIT(SUCCESS_NOTICE_INTERVAL);
+ char *rate_msg = NULL;
+ entry_guard_t *guard = NULL;
+
+ if (!pathbias_should_count(circ)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Don't count cannibalized/reused circs for path bias
+ * "build" success, since they get counted under "use" success. */
+ if (!circ->has_opened) {
+ if (circ->cpath && circ->cpath->extend_info) {
+ guard = entry_guard_get_by_id_digest(
+ circ->cpath->extend_info->identity_digest);
+ }
+
+ if (guard) {
+ if (circ->path_state == PATH_STATE_BUILD_ATTEMPTED) {
+ circ->path_state = PATH_STATE_BUILD_SUCCEEDED;
+ guard->circ_successes++;
+ entry_guards_changed();
+
+ log_info(LD_CIRC, "Got success count %f/%f for guard %s ($%s)",
+ guard->circ_successes, guard->circ_attempts,
+ guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
+ } else {
+ if ((rate_msg = rate_limit_log(&success_notice_limit,
+ approx_time()))) {
+ log_info(LD_BUG,
+ "Succeeded circuit is in strange path state %s. "
+ "Circuit is a %s currently %s.%s",
+ pathbias_state_to_string(circ->path_state),
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->base_.state),
+ rate_msg);
+ tor_free(rate_msg);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (guard->circ_attempts < guard->circ_successes) {
+ log_notice(LD_BUG, "Unexpectedly high successes counts (%f/%f) "
+ "for guard %s ($%s)",
+ guard->circ_successes, guard->circ_attempts,
+ guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
+ }
+ /* In rare cases, CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_TESTING can get converted to
+ * CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_MEASURE_TIMEOUT and have no guards here.
+ * No need to log that case. */
+ } else if (circ->base_.purpose != CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_MEASURE_TIMEOUT) {
+ if ((rate_msg = rate_limit_log(&success_notice_limit,
+ approx_time()))) {
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Completed circuit has no known guard. "
+ "Circuit is a %s currently %s.%s",
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->base_.state),
+ rate_msg);
+ tor_free(rate_msg);
+ }
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (circ->path_state < PATH_STATE_BUILD_SUCCEEDED) {
+ if ((rate_msg = rate_limit_log(&success_notice_limit,
+ approx_time()))) {
+ log_info(LD_BUG,
+ "Opened circuit is in strange path state %s. "
+ "Circuit is a %s currently %s.%s",
+ pathbias_state_to_string(circ->path_state),
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->base_.state),
+ rate_msg);
+ tor_free(rate_msg);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Record an attempt to use a circuit. Changes the circuit's
+ * path state and update its guard's usage counter.
+ *
+ * Used for path bias usage accounting.
+ */
+void
+pathbias_count_use_attempt(origin_circuit_t *circ)
+{
+ entry_guard_t *guard;
+
+ if (!pathbias_should_count(circ)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (circ->path_state < PATH_STATE_BUILD_SUCCEEDED) {
+ log_notice(LD_BUG,
+ "Used circuit is in strange path state %s. "
+ "Circuit is a %s currently %s.",
+ pathbias_state_to_string(circ->path_state),
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->base_.state));
+ } else if (circ->path_state < PATH_STATE_USE_ATTEMPTED) {
+ guard = entry_guard_get_by_id_digest(
+ circ->cpath->extend_info->identity_digest);
+ if (guard) {
+ pathbias_measure_use_rate(guard);
+ pathbias_scale_use_rates(guard);
+ guard->use_attempts++;
+ entry_guards_changed();
+
+ log_debug(LD_CIRC,
+ "Marked circuit %d (%f/%f) as used for guard %s ($%s).",
+ circ->global_identifier,
+ guard->use_successes, guard->use_attempts,
+ guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
+ }
+
+ circ->path_state = PATH_STATE_USE_ATTEMPTED;
+ } else {
+ /* Harmless but educational log message */
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Used circuit %d is already in path state %s. "
+ "Circuit is a %s currently %s.",
+ circ->global_identifier,
+ pathbias_state_to_string(circ->path_state),
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->base_.state));
+ }
+
+ return;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Check the circuit's path state is appropriate and mark it as
+ * successfully used. Used for path bias usage accounting.
+ *
+ * We don't actually increment the guard's counters until
+ * pathbias_check_close(), because the circuit can still transition
+ * back to PATH_STATE_USE_ATTEMPTED if a stream fails later (this
+ * is done so we can probe the circuit for liveness at close).
+ */
+void
+pathbias_mark_use_success(origin_circuit_t *circ)
+{
+ if (!pathbias_should_count(circ)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (circ->path_state < PATH_STATE_USE_ATTEMPTED) {
+ log_notice(LD_BUG,
+ "Used circuit %d is in strange path state %s. "
+ "Circuit is a %s currently %s.",
+ circ->global_identifier,
+ pathbias_state_to_string(circ->path_state),
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->base_.state));
+
+ pathbias_count_use_attempt(circ);
+ }
+
+ /* We don't do any accounting at the guard until actual circuit close */
+ circ->path_state = PATH_STATE_USE_SUCCEEDED;
+
+ return;
+}
+
+/**
+ * If a stream ever detatches from a circuit in a retriable way,
+ * we need to mark this circuit as still needing either another
+ * successful stream, or in need of a probe.
+ *
+ * An adversary could let the first stream request succeed (ie the
+ * resolve), but then tag and timeout the remainder (via cell
+ * dropping), forcing them on new circuits.
+ *
+ * Rolling back the state will cause us to probe such circuits, which
+ * should lead to probe failures in the event of such tagging due to
+ * either unrecognized cells coming in while we wait for the probe,
+ * or the cipher state getting out of sync in the case of dropped cells.
+ */
+void
+pathbias_mark_use_rollback(origin_circuit_t *circ)
+{
+ if (circ->path_state == PATH_STATE_USE_SUCCEEDED) {
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Rolling back pathbias use state to 'attempted' for detached "
+ "circuit %d", circ->global_identifier);
+ circ->path_state = PATH_STATE_USE_ATTEMPTED;
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Actually count a circuit success towards a guard's usage counters
+ * if the path state is appropriate.
+ */
+static void
+pathbias_count_use_success(origin_circuit_t *circ)
+{
+ entry_guard_t *guard;
+
+ if (!pathbias_should_count(circ)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (circ->path_state != PATH_STATE_USE_SUCCEEDED) {
+ log_notice(LD_BUG,
+ "Successfully used circuit %d is in strange path state %s. "
+ "Circuit is a %s currently %s.",
+ circ->global_identifier,
+ pathbias_state_to_string(circ->path_state),
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->base_.state));
+ } else {
+ guard = entry_guard_get_by_id_digest(
+ circ->cpath->extend_info->identity_digest);
+ if (guard) {
+ guard->use_successes++;
+ entry_guards_changed();
+
+ if (guard->use_attempts < guard->use_successes) {
+ log_notice(LD_BUG, "Unexpectedly high use successes counts (%f/%f) "
+ "for guard %s=%s",
+ guard->use_successes, guard->use_attempts,
+ guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
+ }
+
+ log_debug(LD_CIRC,
+ "Marked circuit %d (%f/%f) as used successfully for guard "
+ "%s ($%s).",
+ circ->global_identifier, guard->use_successes,
+ guard->use_attempts, guard->nickname,
+ hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
+ }
+ }
+
+ return;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Send a probe down a circuit that the client attempted to use,
+ * but for which the stream timed out/failed. The probe is a
+ * RELAY_BEGIN cell with a 0.a.b.c destination address, which
+ * the exit will reject and reply back, echoing that address.
+ *
+ * The reason for such probes is because it is possible to bias
+ * a user's paths simply by causing timeouts, and these timeouts
+ * are not possible to differentiate from unresponsive servers.
+ *
+ * The probe is sent at the end of the circuit lifetime for two
+ * reasons: to prevent cryptographic taggers from being able to
+ * drop cells to cause timeouts, and to prevent easy recognition
+ * of probes before any real client traffic happens.
+ *
+ * Returns -1 if we couldn't probe, 0 otherwise.
+ */
+static int
+pathbias_send_usable_probe(circuit_t *circ)
+{
+ /* Based on connection_ap_handshake_send_begin() */
+ char payload[CELL_PAYLOAD_SIZE];
+ int payload_len;
+ origin_circuit_t *ocirc = TO_ORIGIN_CIRCUIT(circ);
+ crypt_path_t *cpath_layer = NULL;
+ char *probe_nonce = NULL;
+
+ tor_assert(ocirc);
+
+ cpath_layer = ocirc->cpath->prev;
+
+ if (cpath_layer->state != CPATH_STATE_OPEN) {
+ /* This can happen for cannibalized circuits. Their
+ * last hop isn't yet open */
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Got pathbias probe request for unopened circuit %d. "
+ "Opened %d, len %d", ocirc->global_identifier,
+ ocirc->has_opened, ocirc->build_state->desired_path_len);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ /* We already went down this road. */
+ if (circ->purpose == CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_PATH_BIAS_TESTING &&
+ ocirc->pathbias_probe_id) {
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Got pathbias probe request for circuit %d with "
+ "outstanding probe", ocirc->global_identifier);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ /* Can't probe if the channel isn't open */
+ if (circ->n_chan == NULL ||
+ (circ->n_chan->state != CHANNEL_STATE_OPEN
+ && circ->n_chan->state != CHANNEL_STATE_MAINT)) {
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Skipping pathbias probe for circuit %d: Channel is not open.",
+ ocirc->global_identifier);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ circuit_change_purpose(circ, CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_PATH_BIAS_TESTING);
+
+ /* Update timestamp for when circuit_expire_building() should kill us */
+ tor_gettimeofday(&circ->timestamp_began);
+
+ /* Generate a random address for the nonce */
+ crypto_rand((char*)&ocirc->pathbias_probe_nonce,
+ sizeof(ocirc->pathbias_probe_nonce));
+ ocirc->pathbias_probe_nonce &= 0x00ffffff;
+ probe_nonce = tor_dup_ip(ocirc->pathbias_probe_nonce);
+
+ tor_snprintf(payload,RELAY_PAYLOAD_SIZE, "%s:25", probe_nonce);
+ payload_len = (int)strlen(payload)+1;
+
+ // XXX: need this? Can we assume ipv4 will always be supported?
+ // If not, how do we tell?
+ //if (payload_len <= RELAY_PAYLOAD_SIZE - 4 && edge_conn->begincell_flags) {
+ // set_uint32(payload + payload_len, htonl(edge_conn->begincell_flags));
+ // payload_len += 4;
+ //}
+
+ /* Generate+Store stream id, make sure it's non-zero */
+ ocirc->pathbias_probe_id = get_unique_stream_id_by_circ(ocirc);
+
+ if (ocirc->pathbias_probe_id==0) {
+ log_warn(LD_CIRC,
+ "Ran out of stream IDs on circuit %u during "
+ "pathbias probe attempt.", ocirc->global_identifier);
+ tor_free(probe_nonce);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Sending pathbias testing cell to %s:25 on stream %d for circ %d.",
+ probe_nonce, ocirc->pathbias_probe_id, ocirc->global_identifier);
+ tor_free(probe_nonce);
+
+ /* Send a test relay cell */
+ if (relay_send_command_from_edge(ocirc->pathbias_probe_id, circ,
+ RELAY_COMMAND_BEGIN, payload,
+ payload_len, cpath_layer) < 0) {
+ log_notice(LD_CIRC,
+ "Failed to send pathbias probe cell on circuit %d.",
+ ocirc->global_identifier);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ /* Mark it freshly dirty so it doesn't get expired in the meantime */
+ circ->timestamp_dirty = time(NULL);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Check the response to a pathbias probe, to ensure the
+ * cell is recognized and the nonce and other probe
+ * characteristics are as expected.
+ *
+ * If the response is valid, return 0. Otherwise return < 0.
+ */
+int
+pathbias_check_probe_response(circuit_t *circ, const cell_t *cell)
+{
+ /* Based on connection_edge_process_relay_cell() */
+ relay_header_t rh;
+ int reason;
+ uint32_t ipv4_host;
+ origin_circuit_t *ocirc = TO_ORIGIN_CIRCUIT(circ);
+
+ tor_assert(cell);
+ tor_assert(ocirc);
+ tor_assert(circ->purpose == CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_PATH_BIAS_TESTING);
+
+ relay_header_unpack(&rh, cell->payload);
+
+ reason = rh.length > 0 ?
+ get_uint8(cell->payload+RELAY_HEADER_SIZE) : END_STREAM_REASON_MISC;
+
+ if (rh.command == RELAY_COMMAND_END &&
+ reason == END_STREAM_REASON_EXITPOLICY &&
+ ocirc->pathbias_probe_id == rh.stream_id) {
+
+ /* Check length+extract host: It is in network order after the reason code.
+ * See connection_edge_end(). */
+ if (rh.length < 9) { /* reason+ipv4+dns_ttl */
+ log_notice(LD_PROTOCOL,
+ "Short path bias probe response length field (%d).", rh.length);
+ return - END_CIRC_REASON_TORPROTOCOL;
+ }
+
+ ipv4_host = ntohl(get_uint32(cell->payload+RELAY_HEADER_SIZE+1));
+
+ /* Check nonce */
+ if (ipv4_host == ocirc->pathbias_probe_nonce) {
+ pathbias_mark_use_success(ocirc);
+ circuit_mark_for_close(circ, END_CIRC_REASON_FINISHED);
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Got valid path bias probe back for circ %d, stream %d.",
+ ocirc->global_identifier, ocirc->pathbias_probe_id);
+ return 0;
+ } else {
+ log_notice(LD_CIRC,
+ "Got strange probe value 0x%x vs 0x%x back for circ %d, "
+ "stream %d.", ipv4_host, ocirc->pathbias_probe_nonce,
+ ocirc->global_identifier, ocirc->pathbias_probe_id);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Got another cell back back on pathbias probe circuit %d: "
+ "Command: %d, Reason: %d, Stream-id: %d",
+ ocirc->global_identifier, rh.command, reason, rh.stream_id);
+ return -1;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Check if a circuit was used and/or closed successfully.
+ *
+ * If we attempted to use the circuit to carry a stream but failed
+ * for whatever reason, or if the circuit mysteriously died before
+ * we could attach any streams, record these two cases.
+ *
+ * If we *have* successfully used the circuit, or it appears to
+ * have been closed by us locally, count it as a success.
+ *
+ * Returns 0 if we're done making decisions with the circ,
+ * or -1 if we want to probe it first.
+ */
+int
+pathbias_check_close(origin_circuit_t *ocirc, int reason)
+{
+ circuit_t *circ = &ocirc->base_;
+
+ if (!pathbias_should_count(ocirc)) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ switch (ocirc->path_state) {
+ /* If the circuit was closed after building, but before use, we need
+ * to ensure we were the ones who tried to close it (and not a remote
+ * actor). */
+ case PATH_STATE_BUILD_SUCCEEDED:
+ if (reason & END_CIRC_REASON_FLAG_REMOTE) {
+ /* Remote circ close reasons on an unused circuit all could be bias */
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Circuit %d remote-closed without successful use for reason %d. "
+ "Circuit purpose %d currently %d,%s. Len %d.",
+ ocirc->global_identifier,
+ reason, circ->purpose, ocirc->has_opened,
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->state),
+ ocirc->build_state->desired_path_len);
+ pathbias_count_collapse(ocirc);
+ } else if ((reason & ~END_CIRC_REASON_FLAG_REMOTE)
+ == END_CIRC_REASON_CHANNEL_CLOSED &&
+ circ->n_chan &&
+ circ->n_chan->reason_for_closing
+ != CHANNEL_CLOSE_REQUESTED) {
+ /* If we didn't close the channel ourselves, it could be bias */
+ /* XXX: Only count bias if the network is live?
+ * What about clock jumps/suspends? */
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Circuit %d's channel closed without successful use for reason "
+ "%d, channel reason %d. Circuit purpose %d currently %d,%s. Len "
+ "%d.", ocirc->global_identifier,
+ reason, circ->n_chan->reason_for_closing,
+ circ->purpose, ocirc->has_opened,
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->state),
+ ocirc->build_state->desired_path_len);
+ pathbias_count_collapse(ocirc);
+ } else {
+ pathbias_count_successful_close(ocirc);
+ }
+ break;
+
+ /* If we tried to use a circuit but failed, we should probe it to ensure
+ * it has not been tampered with. */
+ case PATH_STATE_USE_ATTEMPTED:
+ /* XXX: Only probe and/or count failure if the network is live?
+ * What about clock jumps/suspends? */
+ if (pathbias_send_usable_probe(circ) == 0)
+ return -1;
+ else
+ pathbias_count_use_failed(ocirc);
+
+ /* Any circuit where there were attempted streams but no successful
+ * streams could be bias */
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Circuit %d closed without successful use for reason %d. "
+ "Circuit purpose %d currently %d,%s. Len %d.",
+ ocirc->global_identifier,
+ reason, circ->purpose, ocirc->has_opened,
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->state),
+ ocirc->build_state->desired_path_len);
+ break;
+
+ case PATH_STATE_USE_SUCCEEDED:
+ pathbias_count_successful_close(ocirc);
+ pathbias_count_use_success(ocirc);
+ break;
+
+ case PATH_STATE_USE_FAILED:
+ pathbias_count_use_failed(ocirc);
+ break;
+
+ case PATH_STATE_NEW_CIRC:
+ case PATH_STATE_BUILD_ATTEMPTED:
+ case PATH_STATE_ALREADY_COUNTED:
+ default:
+ // Other states are uninteresting. No stats to count.
+ break;
+ }
+
+ ocirc->path_state = PATH_STATE_ALREADY_COUNTED;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Count a successfully closed circuit.
+ */
+static void
+pathbias_count_successful_close(origin_circuit_t *circ)
+{
+ entry_guard_t *guard = NULL;
+ if (!pathbias_should_count(circ)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (circ->cpath && circ->cpath->extend_info) {
+ guard = entry_guard_get_by_id_digest(
+ circ->cpath->extend_info->identity_digest);
+ }
+
+ if (guard) {
+ /* In the long run: circuit_success ~= successful_circuit_close +
+ * circ_failure + stream_failure */
+ guard->successful_circuits_closed++;
+ entry_guards_changed();
+ } else if (circ->base_.purpose != CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_MEASURE_TIMEOUT) {
+ /* In rare cases, CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_TESTING can get converted to
+ * CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_MEASURE_TIMEOUT and have no guards here.
+ * No need to log that case. */
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Successfully closed circuit has no known guard. "
+ "Circuit is a %s currently %s",
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->base_.state));
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Count a circuit that fails after it is built, but before it can
+ * carry any traffic.
+ *
+ * This is needed because there are ways to destroy a
+ * circuit after it has successfully completed. Right now, this is
+ * used for purely informational/debugging purposes.
+ */
+static void
+pathbias_count_collapse(origin_circuit_t *circ)
+{
+ entry_guard_t *guard = NULL;
+
+ if (!pathbias_should_count(circ)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (circ->cpath && circ->cpath->extend_info) {
+ guard = entry_guard_get_by_id_digest(
+ circ->cpath->extend_info->identity_digest);
+ }
+
+ if (guard) {
+ guard->collapsed_circuits++;
+ entry_guards_changed();
+ } else if (circ->base_.purpose != CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_MEASURE_TIMEOUT) {
+ /* In rare cases, CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_TESTING can get converted to
+ * CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_MEASURE_TIMEOUT and have no guards here.
+ * No need to log that case. */
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Destroyed circuit has no known guard. "
+ "Circuit is a %s currently %s",
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->base_.state));
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Count a known failed circuit (because we could not probe it).
+ *
+ * This counter is informational.
+ */
+static void
+pathbias_count_use_failed(origin_circuit_t *circ)
+{
+ entry_guard_t *guard = NULL;
+ if (!pathbias_should_count(circ)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (circ->cpath && circ->cpath->extend_info) {
+ guard = entry_guard_get_by_id_digest(
+ circ->cpath->extend_info->identity_digest);
+ }
+
+ if (guard) {
+ guard->unusable_circuits++;
+ entry_guards_changed();
+ } else if (circ->base_.purpose != CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_MEASURE_TIMEOUT) {
+ /* In rare cases, CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_TESTING can get converted to
+ * CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_MEASURE_TIMEOUT and have no guards here.
+ * No need to log that case. */
+ /* XXX note cut-and-paste code in this function compared to nearby
+ * functions. Would be nice to refactor. -RD */
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Stream-failing circuit has no known guard. "
+ "Circuit is a %s currently %s",
+ circuit_purpose_to_string(circ->base_.purpose),
+ circuit_state_to_string(circ->base_.state));
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Count timeouts for path bias log messages.
+ *
+ * These counts are purely informational.
+ */
+void
+pathbias_count_timeout(origin_circuit_t *circ)
+{
+ entry_guard_t *guard = NULL;
+
+ if (!pathbias_should_count(circ)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* For hidden service circs, they can actually be used
+ * successfully and then time out later (because
+ * the other side declines to use them). */
+ if (circ->path_state == PATH_STATE_USE_SUCCEEDED) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (circ->cpath && circ->cpath->extend_info) {
+ guard = entry_guard_get_by_id_digest(
+ circ->cpath->extend_info->identity_digest);
+ }
+
+ if (guard) {
+ guard->timeouts++;
+ entry_guards_changed();
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Helper function to count all of the currently opened circuits
+ * for a guard that are in a given path state range. The state
+ * range is inclusive on both ends.
+ */
+static int
+pathbias_count_circs_in_states(entry_guard_t *guard,
+ path_state_t from,
+ path_state_t to)
+{
+ circuit_t *circ;
+ int open_circuits = 0;
+
+ /* Count currently open circuits. Give them the benefit of the doubt. */
+ TOR_LIST_FOREACH(circ, circuit_get_global_list(), head) {
+ origin_circuit_t *ocirc = NULL;
+ if (!CIRCUIT_IS_ORIGIN(circ) || /* didn't originate here */
+ circ->marked_for_close) /* already counted */
+ continue;
+
+ ocirc = TO_ORIGIN_CIRCUIT(circ);
+
+ if (!ocirc->cpath || !ocirc->cpath->extend_info)
+ continue;
+
+ if (ocirc->path_state >= from &&
+ ocirc->path_state <= to &&
+ pathbias_should_count(ocirc) &&
+ fast_memeq(guard->identity,
+ ocirc->cpath->extend_info->identity_digest,
+ DIGEST_LEN)) {
+ log_debug(LD_CIRC, "Found opened circuit %d in path_state %s",
+ ocirc->global_identifier,
+ pathbias_state_to_string(ocirc->path_state));
+ open_circuits++;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return open_circuits;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Return the number of circuits counted as successfully closed for
+ * this guard.
+ *
+ * Also add in the currently open circuits to give them the benefit
+ * of the doubt.
+ */
+double
+pathbias_get_close_success_count(entry_guard_t *guard)
+{
+ return guard->successful_circuits_closed +
+ pathbias_count_circs_in_states(guard,
+ PATH_STATE_BUILD_SUCCEEDED,
+ PATH_STATE_USE_SUCCEEDED);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Return the number of circuits counted as successfully used
+ * this guard.
+ *
+ * Also add in the currently open circuits that we are attempting
+ * to use to give them the benefit of the doubt.
+ */
+double
+pathbias_get_use_success_count(entry_guard_t *guard)
+{
+ return guard->use_successes +
+ pathbias_count_circs_in_states(guard,
+ PATH_STATE_USE_ATTEMPTED,
+ PATH_STATE_USE_SUCCEEDED);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Check the path bias use rate against our consensus parameter limits.
+ *
+ * Emits a log message if the use success rates are too low.
+ *
+ * If pathbias_get_dropguards() is set, we also disable the use of
+ * very failure prone guards.
+ */
+static void
+pathbias_measure_use_rate(entry_guard_t *guard)
+{
+ const or_options_t *options = get_options();
+
+ if (guard->use_attempts > pathbias_get_min_use(options)) {
+ /* Note: We rely on the < comparison here to allow us to set a 0
+ * rate and disable the feature entirely. If refactoring, don't
+ * change to <= */
+ if (pathbias_get_use_success_count(guard)/guard->use_attempts
+ < pathbias_get_extreme_use_rate(options)) {
+ /* Dropping is currently disabled by default. */
+ if (pathbias_get_dropguards(options)) {
+ if (!guard->path_bias_disabled) {
+ log_warn(LD_CIRC,
+ "Your Guard %s ($%s) is failing to carry an extremely large "
+ "amount of stream on its circuits. "
+ "To avoid potential route manipulation attacks, Tor has "
+ "disabled use of this guard. "
+ "Use counts are %ld/%ld. Success counts are %ld/%ld. "
+ "%ld circuits completed, %ld were unusable, %ld collapsed, "
+ "and %ld timed out. "
+ "For reference, your timeout cutoff is %ld seconds.",
+ guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN),
+ tor_lround(pathbias_get_use_success_count(guard)),
+ tor_lround(guard->use_attempts),
+ tor_lround(pathbias_get_close_success_count(guard)),
+ tor_lround(guard->circ_attempts),
+ tor_lround(guard->circ_successes),
+ tor_lround(guard->unusable_circuits),
+ tor_lround(guard->collapsed_circuits),
+ tor_lround(guard->timeouts),
+ tor_lround(get_circuit_build_close_time_ms()/1000));
+ guard->path_bias_disabled = 1;
+ guard->bad_since = approx_time();
+ entry_guards_changed();
+ return;
+ }
+ } else if (!guard->path_bias_use_extreme) {
+ guard->path_bias_use_extreme = 1;
+ log_warn(LD_CIRC,
+ "Your Guard %s ($%s) is failing to carry an extremely large "
+ "amount of streams on its circuits. "
+ "This could indicate a route manipulation attack, network "
+ "overload, bad local network connectivity, or a bug. "
+ "Use counts are %ld/%ld. Success counts are %ld/%ld. "
+ "%ld circuits completed, %ld were unusable, %ld collapsed, "
+ "and %ld timed out. "
+ "For reference, your timeout cutoff is %ld seconds.",
+ guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN),
+ tor_lround(pathbias_get_use_success_count(guard)),
+ tor_lround(guard->use_attempts),
+ tor_lround(pathbias_get_close_success_count(guard)),
+ tor_lround(guard->circ_attempts),
+ tor_lround(guard->circ_successes),
+ tor_lround(guard->unusable_circuits),
+ tor_lround(guard->collapsed_circuits),
+ tor_lround(guard->timeouts),
+ tor_lround(get_circuit_build_close_time_ms()/1000));
+ }
+ } else if (pathbias_get_use_success_count(guard)/guard->use_attempts
+ < pathbias_get_notice_use_rate(options)) {
+ if (!guard->path_bias_use_noticed) {
+ guard->path_bias_use_noticed = 1;
+ log_notice(LD_CIRC,
+ "Your Guard %s ($%s) is failing to carry more streams on its "
+ "circuits than usual. "
+ "Most likely this means the Tor network is overloaded "
+ "or your network connection is poor. "
+ "Use counts are %ld/%ld. Success counts are %ld/%ld. "
+ "%ld circuits completed, %ld were unusable, %ld collapsed, "
+ "and %ld timed out. "
+ "For reference, your timeout cutoff is %ld seconds.",
+ guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN),
+ tor_lround(pathbias_get_use_success_count(guard)),
+ tor_lround(guard->use_attempts),
+ tor_lround(pathbias_get_close_success_count(guard)),
+ tor_lround(guard->circ_attempts),
+ tor_lround(guard->circ_successes),
+ tor_lround(guard->unusable_circuits),
+ tor_lround(guard->collapsed_circuits),
+ tor_lround(guard->timeouts),
+ tor_lround(get_circuit_build_close_time_ms()/1000));
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Check the path bias circuit close status rates against our consensus
+ * parameter limits.
+ *
+ * Emits a log message if the use success rates are too low.
+ *
+ * If pathbias_get_dropguards() is set, we also disable the use of
+ * very failure prone guards.
+ *
+ * XXX: This function shares similar log messages and checks to
+ * pathbias_measure_use_rate(). It may be possible to combine them
+ * eventually, especially if we can ever remove the need for 3
+ * levels of closure warns (if the overall circuit failure rate
+ * goes down with ntor). One way to do so would be to multiply
+ * the build rate with the use rate to get an idea of the total
+ * fraction of the total network paths the user is able to use.
+ * See ticket #8159.
+ */
+static void
+pathbias_measure_close_rate(entry_guard_t *guard)
+{
+ const or_options_t *options = get_options();
+
+ if (guard->circ_attempts > pathbias_get_min_circs(options)) {
+ /* Note: We rely on the < comparison here to allow us to set a 0
+ * rate and disable the feature entirely. If refactoring, don't
+ * change to <= */
+ if (pathbias_get_close_success_count(guard)/guard->circ_attempts
+ < pathbias_get_extreme_rate(options)) {
+ /* Dropping is currently disabled by default. */
+ if (pathbias_get_dropguards(options)) {
+ if (!guard->path_bias_disabled) {
+ log_warn(LD_CIRC,
+ "Your Guard %s ($%s) is failing an extremely large "
+ "amount of circuits. "
+ "To avoid potential route manipulation attacks, Tor has "
+ "disabled use of this guard. "
+ "Success counts are %ld/%ld. Use counts are %ld/%ld. "
+ "%ld circuits completed, %ld were unusable, %ld collapsed, "
+ "and %ld timed out. "
+ "For reference, your timeout cutoff is %ld seconds.",
+ guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN),
+ tor_lround(pathbias_get_close_success_count(guard)),
+ tor_lround(guard->circ_attempts),
+ tor_lround(pathbias_get_use_success_count(guard)),
+ tor_lround(guard->use_attempts),
+ tor_lround(guard->circ_successes),
+ tor_lround(guard->unusable_circuits),
+ tor_lround(guard->collapsed_circuits),
+ tor_lround(guard->timeouts),
+ tor_lround(get_circuit_build_close_time_ms()/1000));
+ guard->path_bias_disabled = 1;
+ guard->bad_since = approx_time();
+ entry_guards_changed();
+ return;
+ }
+ } else if (!guard->path_bias_extreme) {
+ guard->path_bias_extreme = 1;
+ log_warn(LD_CIRC,
+ "Your Guard %s ($%s) is failing an extremely large "
+ "amount of circuits. "
+ "This could indicate a route manipulation attack, "
+ "extreme network overload, or a bug. "
+ "Success counts are %ld/%ld. Use counts are %ld/%ld. "
+ "%ld circuits completed, %ld were unusable, %ld collapsed, "
+ "and %ld timed out. "
+ "For reference, your timeout cutoff is %ld seconds.",
+ guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN),
+ tor_lround(pathbias_get_close_success_count(guard)),
+ tor_lround(guard->circ_attempts),
+ tor_lround(pathbias_get_use_success_count(guard)),
+ tor_lround(guard->use_attempts),
+ tor_lround(guard->circ_successes),
+ tor_lround(guard->unusable_circuits),
+ tor_lround(guard->collapsed_circuits),
+ tor_lround(guard->timeouts),
+ tor_lround(get_circuit_build_close_time_ms()/1000));
+ }
+ } else if (pathbias_get_close_success_count(guard)/guard->circ_attempts
+ < pathbias_get_warn_rate(options)) {
+ if (!guard->path_bias_warned) {
+ guard->path_bias_warned = 1;
+ log_warn(LD_CIRC,
+ "Your Guard %s ($%s) is failing a very large "
+ "amount of circuits. "
+ "Most likely this means the Tor network is "
+ "overloaded, but it could also mean an attack against "
+ "you or potentially the guard itself. "
+ "Success counts are %ld/%ld. Use counts are %ld/%ld. "
+ "%ld circuits completed, %ld were unusable, %ld collapsed, "
+ "and %ld timed out. "
+ "For reference, your timeout cutoff is %ld seconds.",
+ guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN),
+ tor_lround(pathbias_get_close_success_count(guard)),
+ tor_lround(guard->circ_attempts),
+ tor_lround(pathbias_get_use_success_count(guard)),
+ tor_lround(guard->use_attempts),
+ tor_lround(guard->circ_successes),
+ tor_lround(guard->unusable_circuits),
+ tor_lround(guard->collapsed_circuits),
+ tor_lround(guard->timeouts),
+ tor_lround(get_circuit_build_close_time_ms()/1000));
+ }
+ } else if (pathbias_get_close_success_count(guard)/guard->circ_attempts
+ < pathbias_get_notice_rate(options)) {
+ if (!guard->path_bias_noticed) {
+ guard->path_bias_noticed = 1;
+ log_notice(LD_CIRC,
+ "Your Guard %s ($%s) is failing more circuits than "
+ "usual. "
+ "Most likely this means the Tor network is overloaded. "
+ "Success counts are %ld/%ld. Use counts are %ld/%ld. "
+ "%ld circuits completed, %ld were unusable, %ld collapsed, "
+ "and %ld timed out. "
+ "For reference, your timeout cutoff is %ld seconds.",
+ guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN),
+ tor_lround(pathbias_get_close_success_count(guard)),
+ tor_lround(guard->circ_attempts),
+ tor_lround(pathbias_get_use_success_count(guard)),
+ tor_lround(guard->use_attempts),
+ tor_lround(guard->circ_successes),
+ tor_lround(guard->unusable_circuits),
+ tor_lround(guard->collapsed_circuits),
+ tor_lround(guard->timeouts),
+ tor_lround(get_circuit_build_close_time_ms()/1000));
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * This function scales the path bias use rates if we have
+ * more data than the scaling threshold. This allows us to
+ * be more sensitive to recent measurements.
+ *
+ * XXX: The attempt count transfer stuff here might be done
+ * better by keeping separate pending counters that get
+ * transfered at circuit close. See ticket #8160.
+ */
+static void
+pathbias_scale_close_rates(entry_guard_t *guard)
+{
+ const or_options_t *options = get_options();
+
+ /* If we get a ton of circuits, just scale everything down */
+ if (guard->circ_attempts > pathbias_get_scale_threshold(options)) {
+ double scale_ratio = pathbias_get_scale_ratio(options);
+ int opened_attempts = pathbias_count_circs_in_states(guard,
+ PATH_STATE_BUILD_ATTEMPTED, PATH_STATE_BUILD_ATTEMPTED);
+ int opened_built = pathbias_count_circs_in_states(guard,
+ PATH_STATE_BUILD_SUCCEEDED,
+ PATH_STATE_USE_FAILED);
+ /* Verify that the counts are sane before and after scaling */
+ int counts_are_sane = (guard->circ_attempts >= guard->circ_successes);
+
+ guard->circ_attempts -= (opened_attempts+opened_built);
+ guard->circ_successes -= opened_built;
+
+ guard->circ_attempts *= scale_ratio;
+ guard->circ_successes *= scale_ratio;
+ guard->timeouts *= scale_ratio;
+ guard->successful_circuits_closed *= scale_ratio;
+ guard->collapsed_circuits *= scale_ratio;
+ guard->unusable_circuits *= scale_ratio;
+
+ guard->circ_attempts += (opened_attempts+opened_built);
+ guard->circ_successes += opened_built;
+
+ entry_guards_changed();
+
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Scaled pathbias counts to (%f,%f)/%f (%d/%d open) for guard "
+ "%s ($%s)",
+ guard->circ_successes, guard->successful_circuits_closed,
+ guard->circ_attempts, opened_built, opened_attempts,
+ guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
+
+ /* Have the counts just become invalid by this scaling attempt? */
+ if (counts_are_sane && guard->circ_attempts < guard->circ_successes) {
+ log_notice(LD_BUG,
+ "Scaling has mangled pathbias counts to %f/%f (%d/%d open) "
+ "for guard %s ($%s)",
+ guard->circ_successes, guard->circ_attempts, opened_built,
+ opened_attempts, guard->nickname,
+ hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * This function scales the path bias circuit close rates if we have
+ * more data than the scaling threshold. This allows us to be more
+ * sensitive to recent measurements.
+ *
+ * XXX: The attempt count transfer stuff here might be done
+ * better by keeping separate pending counters that get
+ * transfered at circuit close. See ticket #8160.
+ */
+void
+pathbias_scale_use_rates(entry_guard_t *guard)
+{
+ const or_options_t *options = get_options();
+
+ /* If we get a ton of circuits, just scale everything down */
+ if (guard->use_attempts > pathbias_get_scale_use_threshold(options)) {
+ double scale_ratio = pathbias_get_scale_ratio(options);
+ int opened_attempts = pathbias_count_circs_in_states(guard,
+ PATH_STATE_USE_ATTEMPTED, PATH_STATE_USE_SUCCEEDED);
+ /* Verify that the counts are sane before and after scaling */
+ int counts_are_sane = (guard->use_attempts >= guard->use_successes);
+
+ guard->use_attempts -= opened_attempts;
+
+ guard->use_attempts *= scale_ratio;
+ guard->use_successes *= scale_ratio;
+
+ guard->use_attempts += opened_attempts;
+
+ log_info(LD_CIRC,
+ "Scaled pathbias use counts to %f/%f (%d open) for guard %s ($%s)",
+ guard->use_successes, guard->use_attempts, opened_attempts,
+ guard->nickname, hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
+
+ /* Have the counts just become invalid by this scaling attempt? */
+ if (counts_are_sane && guard->use_attempts < guard->use_successes) {
+ log_notice(LD_BUG,
+ "Scaling has mangled pathbias usage counts to %f/%f "
+ "(%d open) for guard %s ($%s)",
+ guard->circ_successes, guard->circ_attempts,
+ opened_attempts, guard->nickname,
+ hex_str(guard->identity, DIGEST_LEN));
+ }
+
+ entry_guards_changed();
+ }
+}
+