diff options
author | Nick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org> | 2003-11-08 04:02:05 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Nick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org> | 2003-11-08 04:02:05 +0000 |
commit | 3dddcf4306df2ecd364f9c45b576d709181bff7b (patch) | |
tree | 8c80b02d23fcd904eecabeb2e59241837701483b /src | |
parent | 24cff42ff742e2a2b75a791ede92aa7464adc76b (diff) | |
download | tor-3dddcf4306df2ecd364f9c45b576d709181bff7b.tar tor-3dddcf4306df2ecd364f9c45b576d709181bff7b.tar.gz |
Add lots of logging to dns.c; change behavior of often-failing assertion
svn:r778
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r-- | src/or/dns.c | 39 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/src/or/dns.c b/src/or/dns.c index 6bfed861c..f51a5ce75 100644 --- a/src/or/dns.c +++ b/src/or/dns.c @@ -114,9 +114,14 @@ int dns_resolve(connection_t *exitconn) { pending_connection->conn = exitconn; pending_connection->next = resolve->pending_connections; resolve->pending_connections = pending_connection; + log_fn(LOG_DEBUG,"Connection (fd %d) waiting for pending DNS resolve of '%s'", + exitconn->s, exitconn->address); + return 0; case CACHE_STATE_VALID: exitconn->addr = resolve->answer; + log_fn(LOG_DEBUG,"Connection (fd %d) found cached answer for '%s'", + exitconn->s, exitconn->address); return 1; case CACHE_STATE_FAILED: return -1; @@ -165,6 +170,9 @@ static int assign_to_dnsworker(connection_t *exitconn) { return -1; } + log_fn(LOG_DEBUG, "Connection (fd %d) needs to resolve '%s'; assigning to DNSWorker (fd %d)", + exitconn->s, exitconn->address, dnsconn->s); + free(dnsconn->address); dnsconn->address = tor_strdup(exitconn->address); dnsconn->state = DNSWORKER_STATE_BUSY; @@ -203,14 +211,19 @@ void dns_cancel_pending_resolve(char *question, connection_t *onlyconn) { if(pend->conn == onlyconn) { resolve->pending_connections = pend->next; free(pend); - if(resolve->pending_connections) /* more pending, don't cancel it */ + if(resolve->pending_connections) {/* more pending, don't cancel it */ + log_fn(LOG_DEBUG, "Connection (fd %d) no longer waiting for resolve of '%s'", + onlyconn->s, question); return; + } } else { for( ; pend->next; pend = pend->next) { if(pend->next->conn == onlyconn) { victim = pend->next; pend->next = victim->next; free(victim); + log_fn(LOG_DEBUG, "Connection (fd %d) no longer waiting for resolve of '%s'", + onlyconn->s, question); return; /* more are pending */ } } @@ -218,6 +231,8 @@ void dns_cancel_pending_resolve(char *question, connection_t *onlyconn) { } } else { /* mark all pending connections to fail */ + log_fn(LOG_DEBUG, "Failing all connections waiting on DNS resolve of '%s'", + question); while(resolve->pending_connections) { pend = resolve->pending_connections; connection_edge_end(pend->conn, END_STREAM_REASON_MISC, NULL); @@ -257,11 +272,21 @@ static void dns_found_answer(char *question, uint32_t answer) { resolve = SPLAY_FIND(cache_tree, &cache_root, &search); if(!resolve) { log_fn(LOG_WARN,"Answer to unasked question '%s'? Dropping.", question); + /* XXX Why drop? Just because we don't care now doesn't mean we shouldn't + * XXX cache the result for later. */ return; } - assert(resolve->state == CACHE_STATE_PENDING); - /* XXX sometimes this still gets triggered. :( */ + if (resolve->state != CACHE_STATE_PENDING) { + log_fn(LOG_WARN, "Duplicate answer to question '%s'; ignoring", + question); + return; + } + /* Removed this assertion: in fact, we'll sometimes get a double answer + * to the same question. This can happen when we ask one worker to resolve + * X.Y.Z., then we cancel the request, and then we ask another worker to + * resolve X.Y.Z. */ + /* assert(resolve->state == CACHE_STATE_PENDING); */ resolve->answer = ntohl(answer); if(resolve->answer) @@ -311,6 +336,9 @@ int connection_dns_process_inbuf(connection_t *conn) { connection_fetch_from_buf((char*)&answer,sizeof(answer),conn); + log_fn(LOG_DEBUG, "DNSWorker (fd %d) returned answer for '%s'", + conn->s, conn->address); + dns_found_answer(conn->address, answer); free(conn->address); @@ -402,6 +430,10 @@ static void spawn_enough_dnsworkers(void) { * but no less than min and no more than max */ connection_t *dnsconn; + /* XXX This may not be the best strategy. Maybe we should queue pending + * XXX requests until the old ones finish or time out: otherwise, if + * XXX the connection requests come fast enough, we never get any DNS done. + */ if(num_dnsworkers_busy == MAX_DNSWORKERS) { /* We always want at least one worker idle. * So find the oldest busy worker and kill it. @@ -409,6 +441,7 @@ static void spawn_enough_dnsworkers(void) { dnsconn = connection_get_by_type_state_lastwritten(CONN_TYPE_DNSWORKER, DNSWORKER_STATE_BUSY); assert(dnsconn); + log_fn(LOG_DEBUG, "Max DNS workers spawned; all are busy. Killing one."); /* tell the exit connection that it's failed */ dns_cancel_pending_resolve(dnsconn->address, NULL); |