aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/or/dns.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>2003-11-08 04:02:05 +0000
committerNick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>2003-11-08 04:02:05 +0000
commit3dddcf4306df2ecd364f9c45b576d709181bff7b (patch)
tree8c80b02d23fcd904eecabeb2e59241837701483b /src/or/dns.c
parent24cff42ff742e2a2b75a791ede92aa7464adc76b (diff)
downloadtor-3dddcf4306df2ecd364f9c45b576d709181bff7b.tar
tor-3dddcf4306df2ecd364f9c45b576d709181bff7b.tar.gz
Add lots of logging to dns.c; change behavior of often-failing assertion
svn:r778
Diffstat (limited to 'src/or/dns.c')
-rw-r--r--src/or/dns.c39
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/src/or/dns.c b/src/or/dns.c
index 6bfed861c..f51a5ce75 100644
--- a/src/or/dns.c
+++ b/src/or/dns.c
@@ -114,9 +114,14 @@ int dns_resolve(connection_t *exitconn) {
pending_connection->conn = exitconn;
pending_connection->next = resolve->pending_connections;
resolve->pending_connections = pending_connection;
+ log_fn(LOG_DEBUG,"Connection (fd %d) waiting for pending DNS resolve of '%s'",
+ exitconn->s, exitconn->address);
+
return 0;
case CACHE_STATE_VALID:
exitconn->addr = resolve->answer;
+ log_fn(LOG_DEBUG,"Connection (fd %d) found cached answer for '%s'",
+ exitconn->s, exitconn->address);
return 1;
case CACHE_STATE_FAILED:
return -1;
@@ -165,6 +170,9 @@ static int assign_to_dnsworker(connection_t *exitconn) {
return -1;
}
+ log_fn(LOG_DEBUG, "Connection (fd %d) needs to resolve '%s'; assigning to DNSWorker (fd %d)",
+ exitconn->s, exitconn->address, dnsconn->s);
+
free(dnsconn->address);
dnsconn->address = tor_strdup(exitconn->address);
dnsconn->state = DNSWORKER_STATE_BUSY;
@@ -203,14 +211,19 @@ void dns_cancel_pending_resolve(char *question, connection_t *onlyconn) {
if(pend->conn == onlyconn) {
resolve->pending_connections = pend->next;
free(pend);
- if(resolve->pending_connections) /* more pending, don't cancel it */
+ if(resolve->pending_connections) {/* more pending, don't cancel it */
+ log_fn(LOG_DEBUG, "Connection (fd %d) no longer waiting for resolve of '%s'",
+ onlyconn->s, question);
return;
+ }
} else {
for( ; pend->next; pend = pend->next) {
if(pend->next->conn == onlyconn) {
victim = pend->next;
pend->next = victim->next;
free(victim);
+ log_fn(LOG_DEBUG, "Connection (fd %d) no longer waiting for resolve of '%s'",
+ onlyconn->s, question);
return; /* more are pending */
}
}
@@ -218,6 +231,8 @@ void dns_cancel_pending_resolve(char *question, connection_t *onlyconn) {
}
} else {
/* mark all pending connections to fail */
+ log_fn(LOG_DEBUG, "Failing all connections waiting on DNS resolve of '%s'",
+ question);
while(resolve->pending_connections) {
pend = resolve->pending_connections;
connection_edge_end(pend->conn, END_STREAM_REASON_MISC, NULL);
@@ -257,11 +272,21 @@ static void dns_found_answer(char *question, uint32_t answer) {
resolve = SPLAY_FIND(cache_tree, &cache_root, &search);
if(!resolve) {
log_fn(LOG_WARN,"Answer to unasked question '%s'? Dropping.", question);
+ /* XXX Why drop? Just because we don't care now doesn't mean we shouldn't
+ * XXX cache the result for later. */
return;
}
- assert(resolve->state == CACHE_STATE_PENDING);
- /* XXX sometimes this still gets triggered. :( */
+ if (resolve->state != CACHE_STATE_PENDING) {
+ log_fn(LOG_WARN, "Duplicate answer to question '%s'; ignoring",
+ question);
+ return;
+ }
+ /* Removed this assertion: in fact, we'll sometimes get a double answer
+ * to the same question. This can happen when we ask one worker to resolve
+ * X.Y.Z., then we cancel the request, and then we ask another worker to
+ * resolve X.Y.Z. */
+ /* assert(resolve->state == CACHE_STATE_PENDING); */
resolve->answer = ntohl(answer);
if(resolve->answer)
@@ -311,6 +336,9 @@ int connection_dns_process_inbuf(connection_t *conn) {
connection_fetch_from_buf((char*)&answer,sizeof(answer),conn);
+ log_fn(LOG_DEBUG, "DNSWorker (fd %d) returned answer for '%s'",
+ conn->s, conn->address);
+
dns_found_answer(conn->address, answer);
free(conn->address);
@@ -402,6 +430,10 @@ static void spawn_enough_dnsworkers(void) {
* but no less than min and no more than max */
connection_t *dnsconn;
+ /* XXX This may not be the best strategy. Maybe we should queue pending
+ * XXX requests until the old ones finish or time out: otherwise, if
+ * XXX the connection requests come fast enough, we never get any DNS done.
+ */
if(num_dnsworkers_busy == MAX_DNSWORKERS) {
/* We always want at least one worker idle.
* So find the oldest busy worker and kill it.
@@ -409,6 +441,7 @@ static void spawn_enough_dnsworkers(void) {
dnsconn = connection_get_by_type_state_lastwritten(CONN_TYPE_DNSWORKER, DNSWORKER_STATE_BUSY);
assert(dnsconn);
+ log_fn(LOG_DEBUG, "Max DNS workers spawned; all are busy. Killing one.");
/* tell the exit connection that it's failed */
dns_cancel_pending_resolve(dnsconn->address, NULL);