| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No changes necessary.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I started by creating a project that contained a forward slash
(importing patches from https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev/) and
it fails to render the "projects" main page.
The specific error reads:
NoReverseMatch at /
Reverse for 'patch-list' with keyword arguments
'{'project_id': 'foo/bar'}' not found. 1 pattern(s) tried:
['project/(?P<project_id>[^/]+)/list/$']
which appears to explicitly disallow forward slashes.
So I think it makes sense to validate that project linkname doesn't
contain forward slahes.
This implementation uses the validate_unicode_slug validator instead of just
rejecting inputs that contain forward slashes.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bracht Laumann Jespersen <t@laumann.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Closes: #380
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As we've done for the Patch and Comment models, this change prevents
database errors from duplicate CoverLetters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
[stephenfin: Add release note]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Presently, when updating a patch we assume that patches are provided.
This isn't necessary - you might just want to make it public - and isn't
enforced by the API itself. However, because we make this assumption, we
see a HTTP 500. Resolve the issue and add tests to prevent a regression.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Resolves: #357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the process of fixing the previous bug, I realised that:
a) /api/patches/msgid is a perfectly reasonable thing to attempt
b) We have no way of finding a patch by message id in the API
We can't actualy make /api/patches/msgid work because it may not
be unique, but we can add a filter.
I'm shoehorning this into stable/2.2, even though it's technically
an API change: it's minor, not incompatible and in hindsight a
glaring hole.
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Tested-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add the latest version of Django.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Closes: #311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Each of these versions of Django is now EOL, and Python 3.5 will be EOL
by time we release the next version. Drop it.
The Python 2.7 cleanup will be done separately.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is unnecessary and was disabling reno's built-in ability to detect
a base branch.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Didn't quite seem like it fit anywhere else in the series. I want
the release note mostly because I hope to backport this to stable.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
View relations and add/update/delete them as a maintainer. Maintainers
can only create relations of patches which are part of a project they
maintain. Because this is a writable many-many nested relationship, it
behaves a little unusually. In short:
- All operations use PATCH to the 'related' field of a patch
- To relate a patch to another patch, say 7 to 19, either:
PATCH /api/patch/7 related := [19]
PATCH /api/patch/19 related := [7]
- To delete a patch from a relation, say 1, 21 and 42 are related but we
only want it to be 1 and 42:
PATCH /api/patch/21 related := []
* You _cannot_ remove a patch from a relation by patching another
patch in the relation: I'm trying to avoid read-modify-write loops.
* Relations that would be left with just 1 patch are deleted. This is
only ensured in the API - the admin interface will let you do this.
- Break-before-make: if you have [1, 12, 24] and [7, 15, 42] and you want
to end up with [1, 12, 15, 42], you have to remove 15 from the second
relation first:
PATCH /api/patch/1 related := [15] will fail with 409 Conflict.
Instead do:
PATCH /api/patch/15 related := []
PATCH /api/patch/1 related := [15]
-> 200 OK, [1, 12, 15, 42] and [7, 42] are the resulting relations
Signed-off-by: Mete Polat <metepolat2000@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Otherwise exception DoesNotExist shows error 500 on Apache
Signed-off-by: Andriy Gelman <andriy.gelman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Closes: #343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As noted in #340 [1], if a patch from a series is dropped or
miscategorised, patches from a later revision of that series can end up
included in the earlier series rather than in their own series. This was
actually intentional as part of the fix for #105 [2]. However,
completely ignoring this information can be problematic. Refine things
by checking for versions and, if they don't match, using timeboxing to
try guess if they should be kept together. This would resolve the issue
seen in #340 while preventing a regression for #105.
[1] https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/340
[1] https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/105
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Tested-by: Ali Alnubani <alialnu@mellanox.com>
Related: #340
Related: #105
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are no breaking changes apparent.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not sure how this ended up here but we both missed this. Correct the
location.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Fixes: d380219e ("api: support filtering patches by hash")
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
By default, the events API orders events by date in descending order
(newest first). However, it's useful to be able to order the events by
oldest events first. For example, when a client is polling the events
API for new events since a given date and wishes to process them in
chronological order.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit f09bfd460814d7125437b0b45a183a221692584a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's no longer supported upstream, per
https://www.djangoproject.com/download/#supported-versions
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Enable Python 3.8 in our tests and list it as a supported version.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To avoid triggering spam filters due to failed signature validation, many
mailing lists mangle the From header to change the From address to be the
address of the list, typically where the sender's domain has a strict DMARC
policy enabled.
In this case, we should try to unmangle the From header.
Add support for using the X-Original-From or Reply-To headers, as used by
Google Groups and Mailman respectively, to unmangle the From header when
necessary and associate the patch with the correct submitter based on the
unmangled email address.
When downloading mboxes, rewrite the From header using the unmangled
address, and preserve the original header as X-Patchwork-Original-From in
case someone needs it for some reason. The original From header will still
be stored in the database and exposed via the API, as we want to keep
messages as close to the original received format as possible.
Closes: #64 ("Incorrect submitter when using googlegroups")
Reported-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> # mailman only
[dja: add release note]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allow users to create a new bundle, change the name, public flag and
patches of an existing bundle, and delete an existing bundle.
Some small nits with existing tests are resolved.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Closes: #316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The random module uses the Mersenne Twister pseudorandom number
generator and is not a cryptographically secure random number
generator[0]. The secrets[1] module is intended for generating
cryptographically strong random numbers, so recommend using that to
generate the secret key. It's new in Python 3, so if it's unavailable
fall back to using the ``os.urandom()`` backed implementation of random.
NOTE(stephenfin): Modified to include change to 'config.yaml'. Also
renamed reno to just stick with hyphens for filenames.
[0] https://docs.python.org/3/library/random.html
[1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/secrets.html
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
An assortment of fixes identified through the integration of pre-commit.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Migrate our URL schema as follows:
Patches: /project/<linkname>/patch/<msgid>/
Cover Letters: /project/<linkname>/cover/<msgid>/
The usual sub-resources (mbox, raw) hang off those URLs.
The old style URLs (/patch/NNN/*, /cover/NNN/*) redirect appropriately.
I haven't attempted to do anything meaningful with series, and I
have dropped any attempt to provide a generic message-id lookup
or search functionality. One step at a time.
Our database still stores message ids as with angle brackets; we
just work around that rather than trying to migrate. That too can
come later if we think the pain is justified.
Partially-closes: #106
Reported-by: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Reported-by-but-I-don't-want-to-spam: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Reported-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is necessary for proper Django 2.2 support. We retain support for
older versions since 3.10 is Python 3-only.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's no longer supported upstream and the *second* last Ubuntu LTS
release provides something newer. Time to move on.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Introduces a new management command which can export all patches in a
project as one mbox file. Export of multiple projects is supported.
Additionally allows to compress the output.
Signed-off-by: Mete Polat <metepolat2000@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We will remove 'pwclient' in v2.3 so it doesn't make much sense to keep
a release note for it around. Remove that too.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Let's start managing this via a separate project, which will allow the
client to evolve separately from the server. No redirect is added for
the old '/pwclient' URL as it seems wiser to return a HTTP 404 error
code.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
INI files should use 'key = value' values, not 'key: value'. Correct
this and fix some other whitespace issues.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Closes: #277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The filters.py redesign that happened for patchwork 1.1 removed
a functionality that we use a lot: to filter patches that weren't
delegated to anyone.
Also, it is a way harder to find someone to delegate with a free
text input. Use, instead a combo-box just like before.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Fixes: f439f541 ("Add delegate filter autocomplete support")
Closes: #60
[stephenfin: Rework release note and fix some style issues]
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 841f966b8d54b2f51ab1c498eed6e5391f2546a9.
In July 2018, we received a report of OzLabs patchwork mangling
emails that have subjects containing words with internal commas,
like "Insert DT binding for foo,bar" (#197).
Stephen took a look and came up with the comment this reverts. Quoting
the commit message:
RFC2822 states that long headers can be wrapped using CRLF followed by
WSP [1]. For example:
Subject: Foo bar,
baz
Should be parsed as:
Foo bar,baz
As it turns out, this is not the case. Journey with me to
section 2.2.3 of RFC 2822:
2.2.3. Long Header Fields
Each header field is logically a single line of characters comprising
the field name, the colon, and the field body. For convenience
however, and to deal with the 998/78 character limitations per line,
the field body portion of a header field can be split into a multiple
line representation; this is called "folding". The general rule is
that wherever this standard allows for folding white space (not
simply WSP characters), a CRLF may be inserted before any WSP. For
example, the header field:
Subject: This is a test
can be represented as:
Subject: This
is a test
So the issue with the example in the reverted commit is that there is no
folding white space in "bar,baz", so it's not valid to split it.
These are valid:
Subject: Foo bar,baz
Subject: Foo
bar,baz
but splitting "bar,baz" into "bar,\n baz" is not valid.
What then is correct unfolding behaviour? Quoting the RFC again:
The process of moving from this folded multiple-line representation
of a header field to its single line representation is called
"unfolding". Unfolding is accomplished by simply removing any CRLF
that is immediately followed by WSP. Each header field should be
treated in its unfolded form for further syntactic and semantic
evaluation.
In other words, the unfolding rule requires you to strip the CRLF, but
it does not permit you to strip the WSP. Indeed, if "bar,\n baz" is
received, the correct unfolding is "bar, baz".
If you do strip the WSP, you end up mashing words together, such as in
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1097852/
So revert the commit, restoring original behaviour, but keep a corrected
version of the test.
This presents a big question though: how did Rob's email up with a
mangled subject line?
To answer this question, you end up having to learn about OzLabs
Patchwork and how it differs from Patchwork the project.
OzLabs Patchwork (patchwork.ozlabs.org) is an installation of Patchwork.
Part of what makes it so useful for so many projects is a little
intervening layer that can massage some mail to make it end up in the
right project. Email that lands in the device tree project is an example
of email that goes through this process. I only learned about this
today and I haven't looked in any detail at precisely what is done to
the mail. The script is not part of the Patchwork project.
This intervening filter is a Python script that runs - and this is an
important detail - in Python 2.7.
Ignoring all the details, the filter basically operates in a pipe
between the mail program and patchwork's parsemail, like
(mail from system) | filter.py | parsemail
At it's very simplest, filter.py acts as follows:
import email
import sys
mail = email.parse_from_file(sys.stdin)
sys.stdout.write(mail.as_string())
Fascinatingly, if you take Rob's email from #197 and put it through this
process, you can see that it is getting mangled:
Before:
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: sound: wm8994: document wlf,csnaddr-pd property
After:
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: sound: wm8994: document wlf,
csnaddr-pd property
You can see that python27 has incorrectly wrapped the header, breaking
where there is not a foldable space. Python3 does not have this issue.
To summarise:
- part of the magic of OzLabs PW is a filter to make sure mail gets to
the right place. This isn't part of the Patchwork project and so is
usually invisible to patchwork developers.
- the filter is written in python27. The email module in py27 has a bug
that incorrectly breaks subjects around commas within words.
- patchwork correctly unfolds those broken subjects with a space after
the comma.
- the extra space was interpreted as a bug in patchwork, leading to a
misinterpretation of the spec to strip out the whitespace that was
believed to be in error.
- that broke other wrapped subjects.
To solve this, revert the commit and I'll work with jk to get the filter
script into py3 compatibility. (Given that py27 sunsets in ~7mo, trying
to fix it is not worth it.)
Closes: #273
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
[stephenfin: Use a new release note instead of editing the original one]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RFC2822 states that long headers can be wrapped using CRLF followed by
WSP [1]. For example:
Subject: Foo bar,
baz
Should be parsed as:
Foo bar,baz
While we were stripping the former, we were not stripping the
latter. This mean that we ended up with the following:
Foo bar, baz
Resolve this.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Closes: #197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Django Admin seems to be doing something funky with how it's handling
the creation of a User's corresponding UserProfile instance when
modelled as an inline field. Re-setting the UserProfile.user attribute
seems to resolve the issue, so do just that.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Closes: #110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was preventing the v1.1 fields from getting dropped as intended.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Closes: #237
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Closes: #225
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Closes: #226
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Closes: #224
Fixes: 9c179bf4c ("REST: Add 'web_url' link to API responses")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't you hate it when links break? These release notes haven't been
included in a release yet so we can just go ahead and update things.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As with 3.7 and 3.8, there are no breaking changes we need to be
concerned with here.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unfortunately, the use of embedded serializers for some fields breaks
the ability to update these fields, either via the HTML interface (where
the widget is totally busted) or via a client like 'git-pw'. What we
actually want is to be able to update these fields like normal primary
key but show them using the embedded serializer. We do just this by
using a modified variant of the PrimaryKeyRelatedField and using the
serializers simply for displaying.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Closes: #216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These should only be configurable by superusers as invalid configuration
can break things.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Closes: #217
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We need to start adding these as part of the bug fix itself.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Just for those that don't read the Django release notes.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|