| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Four issues to resolve:
- The 'tags' field is a key-value mapping, not an array.
- Each header in the 'headers' field can be either a string or a list
value.
- Errors are reported as a mapping of the field name to an array of
errors, not a string.
- The security type information isn't complete and doesn't account for
security types. Skip it for now.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Turns out you don't have to nest common elements under individual routes
[1]. Less duplication and more sensible docs = winning.
[1] https://swagger.io/specification/#pathItemObject
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As discussed at [1], "subtypes can add restrictions, but they cannot
relax restrictions that are already in place." These fields need to be
marked nullable and then "subclassed" to set non-nullability if
required.
[1] https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/issues/1368
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Just to make sure we're not generating garbage.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that pyup properly supports compatible ranges [1], it's time to
remove these markers.
[1] https://github.com/pyupio/pyup/pull/367
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Presently, when updating a patch we assume that patches are provided.
This isn't necessary - you might just want to make it public - and isn't
enforced by the API itself. However, because we make this assumption, we
see a HTTP 500. Resolve the issue and add tests to prevent a regression.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Resolves: #357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the process of fixing the previous bug, I realised that:
a) /api/patches/msgid is a perfectly reasonable thing to attempt
b) We have no way of finding a patch by message id in the API
We can't actualy make /api/patches/msgid work because it may not
be unique, but we can add a filter.
I'm shoehorning this into stable/2.2, even though it's technically
an API change: it's minor, not incompatible and in hindsight a
glaring hole.
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Tested-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
mpe and jk and sfr found that the OzLabs server was melting due
to some queries downloading every patch.
Turns out if you 404 the patch detail view in the API, d-r-f attempts
to render a listbox with every single patch to fill in the 'related'
field. The bundle API also has a similar field.
Replace the multiple selection box with a text field. You can still
(AIUI) populate the relevant patch IDs manually.
This is the recommended approach per
https://www.django-rest-framework.org/topics/browsable-api/#handling-choicefield-with-large-numbers-of-items
Reported-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Tested-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Server-no-longer-on-fire-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This lets us use e.g. f-strings. We also bump the version of the default
pre-commit lib and migrate to the upstream flake8 plugin, since the old
one is now deprecated.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change fixes a few omissions in the grant scripts:
- patchrelation is missing from both mysql and postgres scripts; it's
only needed for web user access.
- event is missing from the web grants on postgres, and the mail grants
on mysql.
Tested on postgres only.
Fixes: 27c2acf56c ("models, templates: Add patch relations")
Fixes: 34e3c9c493 ("sql: Update 'grant-all.mysql' script with missing tables")
Fixes: 234bc7c316 ("lib/sql: fix permissions for v2.0.0 on postgres")
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was preventing us from doing e.g.:
tox -e py36-django30 -- patchwork -v 2
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This resolves the following irritating warnings that were popping up on
Python 3.7 and 3.8 and were silenced on 3.6:
/usr/lib/python3.7/unittest/suite.py:107: ResourceWarning: unclosed <socket.socket ...>
Note that we need to use a subclass because the 'ServerProxy' class,
rather annoyingly, does not expose a 'close()' method. Instead, you're
expected to use a context manager, which isn't useful from the context
of a 'setUp' call. We could call '__enter__' and '__exit__' manually but
this seems cleaner. Also note that 'Server' was an alias of
'ServerProxy' [1], and we're taking the opportunity to switch here.
[1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/xmlrpc.client.html#xmlrpc.client.ServerProxy
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All of these are defaults in Python 3 [1].
[1] https://docs.python.org/3.6/library/__future__.html
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This does not support Django 3.0 yet [1].
[1] https://github.com/django-dbbackup/django-dbbackup/issues/314
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Django has wanted this for a long time. It doesn't seem to do anything
but it keeps Django happy so...
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This version formally includes support for Django 3.0 [1].
The default installed version of Django is bumped to 3.0.
[1] https://django-debug-toolbar.readthedocs.io/en/latest/changes.html
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add the latest version of Django.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Closes: #311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Django 3.0 switches to using Python 3's built-in HTML escaper, which
prefers to escape entities using hex rather than decimal.
Some of our tests check rendered HTML output against pre-escaped
strings, and fail because ''' is now '''.
Fix this by using the escape function so we get consistent escaping no
matter which Django version.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We no longer need these dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Both this and the version of Django we were running with it are EOL
upstream. It's time to drop them.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will probably need to be reintroduced with future Django versions,
but for now it's gone.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a straight forward swap, thankfully. Django 2.2 is chosen as
it's the latest LTS.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Each of these versions of Django is now EOL, and Python 3.5 will be EOL
by time we release the next version. Drop it.
The Python 2.7 cleanup will be done separately.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 5b904f91c4cab1ff3f8460c9d4ed920a990c8db3. It is no
longer necessary now that we're dropping Python 2.7 support.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is what users will want right now.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is unnecessary and was disabling reno's built-in ability to detect
a base branch.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Include migrations in the flake8 checks, which should catch some simple
undefined variables errors.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Didn't quite seem like it fit anywhere else in the series. I want
the release note mostly because I hope to backport this to stable.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can trivially extend what we've just done to other parts of the API.
I haven't done much by way of benchmark but we're seeing multiple 'x's
pretty much across the board when filtering.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The patch listing query is punishingly slow under even very simple
filters.
The new data model in 3.0 will help _a lot_, so this is a simple fix: I
did try indexes but haven't got really deeply into the weeds of what we can do
with them.
Move a number of things from select_related to prefetch_related: we trade off
one big, inefficient query for a slightly larger number of significantly more
efficient queries.
On my laptop with 2 copies of the canonical kernel team list loaded into the
database, and considering only the API view (the JSON view is always faster)
with warm caches and considering the entire set of SQL queries:
- /api/patches/?project=1
~1.4-1.5s -> <100ms, something like 14x better
- /api/patches/?project=1&since=2010-11-01T00:00:00
~1.7-1.8s -> <560ms, something like 3x better (now dominated by the
counting query only invoked on the HTML API view,
not the pure JSON API view.)
The things I moved:
* project: this was generating SQL that looked like:
INNER JOIN `patchwork_project` T5
ON (`patchwork_submission`.`project_id` = T5.`id`)
This is correct but we've already had to join the patchwork_submission
table and perhaps as a result it seems to be inefficient.
* series__project: Likewise we've already had to join the series table,
doing another join is possibly why it is inefficient.
* delegate: I do not know why this was tanking performance. I think it
might relate to the strategy mysql was using.
Reported-by: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The DRF web view counts the patches as part of pagination.
The query it uses is a disaster zone:
SELECT Count(*) FROM (
SELECT DISTINCT
`patchwork_submission`.`id` AS Col1,
`patchwork_submission`.`msgid` AS Col2,
`patchwork_submission`.`date` AS Col3,
`patchwork_submission`.`submitter_id` AS Col4,
`patchwork_submission`.`project_id` AS Col5,
`patchwork_submission`.`name` AS Col6,
`patchwork_patch`.`submission_ptr_id` AS Col7,
`patchwork_patch`.`commit_ref` AS Col8,
`patchwork_patch`.`pull_url` AS Col9,
`patchwork_patch`.`delegate_id` AS Col10,
`patchwork_patch`.`state_id` AS Col11,
`patchwork_patch`.`archived` AS Col12,
`patchwork_patch`.`hash` AS Col13,
`patchwork_patch`.`patch_project_id` AS Col14,
`patchwork_patch`.`series_id` AS Col15,
`patchwork_patch`.`number` AS Col16,
`patchwork_patch`.`related_id` AS Col17
FROM `patchwork_patch`
INNER JOIN `patchwork_submission`
ON (`patchwork_patch`.`submission_ptr_id`=`patchwork_submission`.`id`)
WHERE `patchwork_submission`.`project_id`=1
)
This is because django-filters adds a DISTINCT qualifier on a
ModelMultiChoiceFilter by default. I guess it makes sense and they do a
decent job of justifying it, but it causes the count to be made with
this awful subquery. (The justification is that they don't know if you're
filtering on a to-many relationship, in which case there could be
duplicate values that need to be removed.)
While fixing that, we can also tell the filter to filter on patch_project
rather than submission's project, which allows us in some cases to avoid
the join entirely.
The resultant SQL is beautiful when filtering by project only:
SELECT COUNT(*) AS `__count`
FROM `patchwork_patch`
WHERE `patchwork_patch`.`patch_project_id` = 1
On my test setup (2x canonical kernel mailing list in the db, warm cache,
my laptop) this query goes from >1s to ~10ms, a ~100x improvement.
If we filter by project and date the query is still nice, but still also
very slow:
SELECT COUNT(*) AS `__count`
FROM `patchwork_patch`
INNER JOIN `patchwork_submission`
ON (`patchwork_patch`.`submission_ptr_id`=`patchwork_submission`.`id`)
WHERE (`patchwork_patch`.`patch_project_id`=1 AND `patchwork_submission`.`date`>='2010-11-01 00:00:00')
This us from ~1.3s to a bit under 400ms - still not ideal, but I'll take
the 3x improvement!
Reported-by: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
View relations and add/update/delete them as a maintainer. Maintainers
can only create relations of patches which are part of a project they
maintain. Because this is a writable many-many nested relationship, it
behaves a little unusually. In short:
- All operations use PATCH to the 'related' field of a patch
- To relate a patch to another patch, say 7 to 19, either:
PATCH /api/patch/7 related := [19]
PATCH /api/patch/19 related := [7]
- To delete a patch from a relation, say 1, 21 and 42 are related but we
only want it to be 1 and 42:
PATCH /api/patch/21 related := []
* You _cannot_ remove a patch from a relation by patching another
patch in the relation: I'm trying to avoid read-modify-write loops.
* Relations that would be left with just 1 patch are deleted. This is
only ensured in the API - the admin interface will let you do this.
- Break-before-make: if you have [1, 12, 24] and [7, 15, 42] and you want
to end up with [1, 12, 15, 42], you have to remove 15 from the second
relation first:
PATCH /api/patch/1 related := [15] will fail with 409 Conflict.
Instead do:
PATCH /api/patch/15 related := []
PATCH /api/patch/1 related := [15]
-> 200 OK, [1, 12, 15, 42] and [7, 42] are the resulting relations
Signed-off-by: Mete Polat <metepolat2000@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Introduces the ability to add relations between patches. Relations are
displayed in the details page of a patch under 'Related'. Related
patches located in another projects can be viewed as well.
Changes to relations are tracked in events. Currently the display of
this is very bare in the API but that will be fixed in a subsequent patch:
this is the minimum required to avoid throwing errors when you view the
events feed.
Signed-off-by: Mete Polat <metepolat2000@gmail.com>
[dja: address some review comments from Stephen, add an admin view,
move to using Events, misc tidy-ups.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Related: #343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Otherwise exception DoesNotExist shows error 500 on Apache
Signed-off-by: Andriy Gelman <andriy.gelman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Closes: #343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Migration 0039 attempts to move patches that have ended up in an
arbitrary series due to race conditions into the correct series.
However, there are a number of race conditions that can occur here that
make this particularly tricky to do. Given that series are really just
arbitary metadata, it's not really necessary to do this...so don't.
Instead, just delete the series references that identical message IDs
and below to the same project, allowing us to add the uniqueness
constraint and prevent the issue bubbling up in the future. This means
we're still left with orphaned series but these could be fixed manually,
if necessary.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Tested-by: Ali Alnubani <alialnu@mellanox.com>
Closes: #340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As noted in #340 [1], if a patch from a series is dropped or
miscategorised, patches from a later revision of that series can end up
included in the earlier series rather than in their own series. This was
actually intentional as part of the fix for #105 [2]. However,
completely ignoring this information can be problematic. Refine things
by checking for versions and, if they don't match, using timeboxing to
try guess if they should be kept together. This would resolve the issue
seen in #340 while preventing a regression for #105.
[1] https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/340
[1] https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/105
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Tested-by: Ali Alnubani <alialnu@mellanox.com>
Related: #340
Related: #105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's unlikely but 'Submission.content' is nullable and we weren't
handling this here. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Fixes: 7f6685a2a ("Fix CRLF newlines upon submission changes")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We've updated our fixtures to use this newer version, meaning we no
longer need to pass an explicit '--list-id' argument. Lovely.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
Fixes: 9a0b5992 ("fixtures: Update Patchwork list ID")
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are no breaking changes apparent.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is long overdue and highlights a small issue, which is easily fixed
by use of Sphinx.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
|