From 5935c6b17dcf05b8ec7d10623098961ccf059555 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: chrysn Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 18:08:08 +0200 Subject: suggestion on formatted times --- .../edittemplate_should_support_uuid__44___date_variables.mdwn | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/todo/edittemplate_should_support_uuid__44___date_variables.mdwn b/doc/todo/edittemplate_should_support_uuid__44___date_variables.mdwn index e88f0cc9d..73f04adf0 100644 --- a/doc/todo/edittemplate_should_support_uuid__44___date_variables.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/edittemplate_should_support_uuid__44___date_variables.mdwn @@ -70,3 +70,10 @@ Changes to the structure of `$pagestate{$registering_page}{edittemplate}{$pagesp >>> timestamp variables/objects, so I left the naming as it was. >>> >>> --[[smcv]] + +>>>> the ready/edittemplate branch looks good to me too. `formatted_time` and +>>>> `html_time` probably don't hurt, but personally i'd not add either and +>>>> instead expose displaytime as a directive, for otherwise migrating to +>>>> html5 would leave old evaluations of displaytime around in the repository. +>>>> (example template: `\[[!meta date=""]]I wrote this post at +>>>> \[[!displaytime ""]]`). --[[chrysn]] -- cgit v1.2.3