From ff3e3dcf64c68f5b1fbae8168310876a60478f9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "simon@4e26c0bdeb57cbb3cc79e234379178f37fa71d06" Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 07:36:03 -0400 Subject: Suggest shake --- doc/todo/rewrite_ikiwiki_in_haskell/discussion.mdwn | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) (limited to 'doc/todo') diff --git a/doc/todo/rewrite_ikiwiki_in_haskell/discussion.mdwn b/doc/todo/rewrite_ikiwiki_in_haskell/discussion.mdwn index ccad64351..79a6a758c 100644 --- a/doc/todo/rewrite_ikiwiki_in_haskell/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/rewrite_ikiwiki_in_haskell/discussion.mdwn @@ -78,3 +78,9 @@ the page-linking rules are not yet implemented (the wiki link target is passed t Directives, I've written basic implementations of `meta` and `tag`. In both cases, I build up Hakyll `Metadata`, which is really a hash map. I've yet to figure out plumbing that back into Hakyll, though. I've got an idea of how to handle `template`, but haven't tried coding it up yet. — [[Jon]] + +——- + +Cool, Jon. Have you thought about Shake + pandoc as an interesting alternative to Hakyll, +perhaps a little more lightweight and flexible ? Here’s a [bit of Shake code](https://github.com/simonmichael/hledger/blob/master/Shake.hs#L421) +I use for rendering wiki-like pages. —[[Simon Michael]] -- cgit v1.2.3