From ae04b2de7a2031b691ede0205030df0de082d2b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amitai Schleier Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 12:19:39 +0200 Subject: Bump Tincho's OSM for needing review. --- doc/plugins/osm/discussion.mdwn | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) (limited to 'doc/plugins') diff --git a/doc/plugins/osm/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/osm/discussion.mdwn index 2a41b35d2..b6b5c7a13 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/osm/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/osm/discussion.mdwn @@ -64,6 +64,11 @@ For usability it would be great if it was possible to display the active waypoin - Should we vendor Leaflet into an underlay, instead of needing a URL to load it from a CDN? [[schmonz]] somewhat prefers this, so we avoid needing external resources by default, avoid breaking when the Leaflet CDN is down, etc. - Should we write some tests before merging? `osm.pm` hadn't had any, FWIW +Bump! Tincho would like to see us merge his effort, and FWIW I'd also +rather not have to carry around a local copy of his work to get a map +with waypoints on my HTTPS site. [[smcv]], can you spare some round +tuits to give us your thoughts? --[[schmonz]] + ---- Just stumbled onto this. -- cgit v1.2.3