From d4481392522c977f7eb4ab4ae7c474edd6d0d033 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/" Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 10:46:58 -0400 Subject: analysis, branches --- ...eated_tagbase_is_not_transient_autoindexed.mdwn | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'doc/bugs/transient_autocreated_tagbase_is_not_transient_autoindexed.mdwn') diff --git a/doc/bugs/transient_autocreated_tagbase_is_not_transient_autoindexed.mdwn b/doc/bugs/transient_autocreated_tagbase_is_not_transient_autoindexed.mdwn index 3eb1542d3..12e01a678 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/transient_autocreated_tagbase_is_not_transient_autoindexed.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/transient_autocreated_tagbase_is_not_transient_autoindexed.mdwn @@ -1,7 +1,31 @@ mkdir -p ikiwiki-tag-test/raw/a_dir/ ikiwiki-tag-test/rendered/ - echo '[[!taglink a_tag]]' > ikiwiki-tag-test/raw/a_dir/a_page.mdwn + echo '\[[!taglink a_tag]]' > ikiwiki-tag-test/raw/a_dir/a_page.mdwn ikiwiki --verbose --plugin tag --plugin autoindex --plugin mdwn --set autoindex_commit=0 --set tagbase=tag --set tag_autocreate=1 --set tag_autocreate_commit=0 ikiwiki-tag-test/raw/ ikiwiki-tag-test/rendered/ ls -al ikiwiki-tag-test/raw/.ikiwiki/transient/ ls -al ikiwiki-tag-test/rendered/tag/ Shouldn't `ikiwiki-tag-test/raw/.ikiwiki/transient/tag.mdwn` and `ikiwiki-tag-test/rendered/tag/index.html` exist? + +[[!tag patch]] +[[!template id=gitbranch branch=ready/smcv/autoindex author=smcv]] +[[!template id=gitbranch branch=ready/smcv/autoindex-more-often author=smcv]] + +> To have a starting point to (maybe) change this, my `ready/autoindex` +> branch adds a regression test for the current behaviour, both with +> and without `autoindex_commit` enabled. It also fixes an unnecessary +> and potentially harmful special case for the transient directory. +> +> The fact that files in underlays (including transient files) don't +> trigger autoindexing is deliberate. However, this is the second +> request to change this behaviour: the first was +> [[!debbug 611068]], which has a patch from Tuomas Jormola. +> On that bug report, Joey explains why it's undesirable +> for the original behaviour of autoindex (when the +> index isn't transient). +> +> I'm not sure whether the same reasoning still applies when the +> index is transient, though (`autoindex_commit => 0`), +> because the index pages won't be cluttering up people's +> git repositories any more? My `autoindex-more` branch changes +> the logic so it will do what you want in the `autoindex_commit => 0` +> case, and amends the appropriate regression test. --[[smcv]] -- cgit v1.2.3